Abstract
Background Gastric cancer management remains fraught with high morbidity and mortality rates owing to surgical interventions. Postoperative complications and extended hospitalisation profoundly affect patient survival, with elderly and medically compromised patients facing greater risks. We hypothesised that regional anaesthesia may reduce the surgical stress response and thus mortality. Hence, this study was aimed at investigating whether adjunctive application of regional anaesthesia during gastric cancer surgery attenuates the stress response to surgery, thereby improving postoperative survival outcomes.
Methods In this study, we critically examined the potential role of regional anaesthesia in modulating perioperative immune and inflammatory responses, which are vital for improving oncological outcomes. Previous studies using diverse methodologies have provided heterogeneous and inconclusive results regarding the effectiveness of regional anaesthesia in enhancing cancer-related survival. Our study addresses these inconsistencies using a robust research design that was focused on a well-defined patient cohort.
Results Preliminary evidence suggests that regional anaesthesia can modulate immune responses. However, its clinical benefits in cancer recurrence and survival have not been consistently demonstrated. The extant literature reflects a gap between preclinical promise and clinical efficacy, with no substantial evidence supporting a reduction in cancer recurrence after gastroesophageal cancer surgery under regional anaesthesia.
Conclusion This study provides new insights into the role of regional anaesthesia in reducing the overall mortality in gastric cancer surgery. By employing stringent inclusion criteria and a well-defined patient cohort, this study aimed to provide clarity in a field marked by inconclusive evidence and guide future clinical practices and high-quality research initiatives.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ehics comittee/IRB of Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Email: tatsuki-onishi{at}biwako.shiga-u.ac.jp
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
