Abstract
Since the pandemic’s beginning, there have been significant setbacks in social and economic inclusion of women. The resistance by public can be quite challenging too due to different reasons, such as religious beliefs or the dominance of custom and traditions creating a consistency in leadership perceptions and prototypes of leaders. The Saudi vision unleashed the exacerbated efforts to increase women involvement in the workforce and empower them in leadership roles. Yet the overall representation of women in leadership positions in health and academe in Saudi Arabia remains low compared to other countries. Exploring women status in medical imaging and the risks of reversals after the pandemic became necessary. An online questionnaire was distributed to female workers in both health and academic institutions in the field of medical imaging from December 31, 2021 to October 10, 2022. A total of 250 responses were received, and only 240 females consented and met the criteria for inclusion in the study. Results show that Saudi women still face the glass ceiling when it comes to administrative roles even though they have high level of self-esteem and efficacy along with the support from the Saudi government by fair wages compared to male counterparts. However, institutions imposed largely more constraints on women, creating difficult environment for gender diversity in work culture such as breastfeeding hour, rest during working hours, leave for accompanying family member in sickness or hospitalization such as children, sick leaves during pregnancy or monthly period. In a remarkably short span of time, the current Saudi government has undertaken commendable initiatives to empower women, achieving their predetermined targets with notable success. Despite that, there are many familial and cultural challenges that hinder them from leading positions. The perceived efficacy of women leaders and the disparities in their leadership philosophies are still up for research.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was issued by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at King Saud University Medical City (KSU-MC) number E-21-6532. Consent from participants was based on the agreement to participate during the online survey.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
