Abstract
Objectives To explore athlete’s and sports physiotherapists’ experiences of sports-related pain in the upper and lower limb.
Methods Using a constructivist and pragmatic perspective we carried out focus groups comprising a deliberate criterion sample of athletes and sports physiotherapists. We used a topic guide that moved from open exploratory questions to questions focusing on the phenomena of sports-related pain in athletes. We coded, developed candidate themes and refined finalised themes using reflexive thematic analysis. A member of our research team acted as a critical friend adding additional perspectives. We followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ).
Results We completed five focus groups comprising twelve athletes (n=5 female, n=7 male) and four sports physiotherapists (n=4 male) including one initial pilot (two athletes). We developed four final themes (I-IV) and nine subthemes (a-i). I) Athlete Pain Lens ( a - pain is part of being an athlete, b - pain shapes the life of an athlete) II) Exploring And Navigating Pain (c- the sports-related pain spectrum, d- making sense of pain) III) The Emotional Toll of Pain (e - challenging emotions, f - the impact of time) IV) Coping, Community and Communication (g - coping with Pain, h - influence of community and support network, i - communication-the broken key).
Conclusion We highlighted the distinct and challenging phenomenon of sports-related pain experienced by athletes and physiotherapists. Through effective communication members of the athlete’s community may recognize, and adjust to these challenges.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by funding from Science Foundation Ireland under the grant for the Insight SFI Research Centre for Data Analytics (SFI/12/RC/2289_P2)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical guidelines were followed as per the Declaration of Helsinki, and permission was granted for this study by the University College Dublin Human Research Ethics Committee. (LS-22-40-Purcell-Caulfield)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
The original manuscript has been revised altering the presentation of the results and discussion alongside some of the figures and tables. The methodology and results remain the same. The title has been edited to better fit the revised presentation.
Data Availability
All data produced are available online at:10.17632/t47tw94mzd.1 https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/t47tw94mzd/2
