Abstract
Although China’s economy and living conditions have improved significantly in the past few decades, previous studies have found that residents’ happiness has not kept pace with them accordingly. Such an Esterlin paradox may partly be due to the increase in psychological stress in the progress of China’s urbanization. To verify this point, we constructed an index of psychological stress (IPS) through daily internet search queries of four psychological stress-related keywords obtained from the Baidu Index from 2011 to 2021. The IPS for each province, municipality, and main city during 2018-2019 was also calculated. Meanwhile, the city level’s economic factors (GDP per capita, income of employees), living costs (housing prices, commuting time), and living environment quality (air quality, environmental noise) were employed to predict the IPS. The results showed that the IPS in China showed an upward trend from 2011 to 2021, and it was higher in the eastern coastal regions than in other regions. Housing prices and commuting time were the only significant predictors of IPS in the hierarchical regression. Our results suggested that the Easterlin paradox in China may be explained by the rising IPS linked with higher living expenses in the course of urbanization.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study used ONLY openly available human data that were originally located at:https://index.baidu.com/v2/index.html
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced are available online at https://osf.io/fjkac/files/osfstorage
