Abstract
Background Following successful intensive interventions to rapidly increase HIV awareness, antiretroviral therapy (ART) coverage, and viral suppression, HIV programmes in eastern and southern Africa must now consider whether to scale-back certain programmes, such as widespread general population HIV testing services (general HTS), without risking a resurging epidemic or substantially increasing long-term ART need through slowed incidence declines.
Methods We used a mathematical model (Thembisa) to project the South African HIV epidemic to 2100 under current epidemiologic and programmatic conditions. We assessed the epidemiological impact and cost of implementing general HTS reductions at different times between 2025 and 2050, while maintaining antenatal, symptom-based, and risk-based testing modalities and other HIV prevention. We considered how future uncertainty interacted with testing reductions by assuming positive or negative changes in ART interruption rates and condom usage over 2025–2035.
Findings Under the status quo scenario, HIV incidence (15-49 years) steadily declined from 4.95/1000 (95% CI: 4.40–5.34) in 2025 to 0.14/1000 (0.05–0.31) in 2100, attaining <1/1000 in 2055 (2051–2060). When general HTS was scaled-back in 2025, incidence continued declining, but time to <1/1000 was delayed by 5, 13, and 35 years for a 25%, 50%, or 75% reduction in general HTS, and not attained by 2100 with full cessation. Reducing general HTS by 25% to 100% from 2025 resulted in 10% (8–12%) to 65% (53–77%) more new HIV infections and 7% (5–8%) to 46% (38–53%) more AIDS-related deaths over 50 years. Delaying general HTS reductions for 5 to 25 years mitigated some impacts. HIV testing accounted for only 5% of total programmatic costs at baseline. Reducing testing modestly reduced short-term total costs, but increased long-term costs. Changes in ART interruption rates and condom usage levels affected incidence decline rates and general HTS levels required to control transmission but did not cause rapid resurgent incidence.
Interpretation Scaling-back general HTS did not result in resurging HIV infections, but it delayed attainment of incidence reduction targets and increased long-term expected infections, deaths, ART provision, and costs. HIV programmes face decisions balancing near-term health system resource savings by reducing intensive HIV programmes with epidemic control objectives over several decades.
Funding BMGF, Wellcome, UKRI
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-019496). SPR, LKW and JWI-E acknowledge funding from the MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis (reference MR/R015600/1), jointly funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) and the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO), under the MRC/FCDO Concordat agreement and is also part of the EDCTP2 programme supported by the European Union. LKW acknowledges funding from the Wellcome Trust (grant number 218669/Z/19/Z). GM-R and LJ acknowledge funding from United States Agency for International Development (USAID) (award number: 72067419CA00004). For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
