Abstract
Background Eight years to the set deadline for the 2030 SDGs, child mortality remains a major health challenge in Sub-Saharan Africa. Child survival is greatly influenced by household circumstances and mother’s healthcare choices. Notwithstanding tremendous investment in women empowerment in Ghana, there is limited empirical evidence on whether women’s autonomy translates into better child mortality outcomes.
Objective To examine the association between women’s autonomy and neonatal, infant and under-five mortality in the Upper East Region of Ghana.
Methods Data were obtained from a randomized cluster household survey among 15-49 years old women in seven districts in the Upper East Region. Data analysis was restricted to 3,243 women who reported ever having given birth. Based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA), we constructed an autonomy index categorized into least, moderate, and high autonomy based on responses to six questions regarding household decision-making. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to assess the association of women’s autonomy status and mortality outcomes.
Results Attaining secondary education or higher was significantly associated with infant mortality (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)= 0.39, CI= 0.16, 0.94) and under-five mortality (aOR= 0.39, CI= 0.18-0.87). Also, maternal age was significantly associated with neonatal, infant, and under-five mortality, while living in rural setting was significantly associated with lower risk of neonatal (aOR= 0.38, CI=0.19-0.75) and under-five (aOR= 0.63, CI= 0.48-0.83) mortality. However, we found that compared to women with least autonomy, infants of those with moderate autonomy (aOR= 1.76, CI 1.07-2.89) and high autonomy (aOR= 1.75; CI= 1.04- 2.93) were significantly more likely to die.
Conclusion In this study setting, women’s autonomy was not predictive of child mortality. Interventions that aim to improve child mortality should pay attention to community and family level factors that promote increase utilization of essential early childhood interventions.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
"N/A"
Funding Statement
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The data for this study was approved by the Navrongo Health Research Centre Institutional Review Board
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data are available for public use and can be obtained by request to the Director of Navrongo Health Research Centre, Box 114, Navrongo, Ionpoa{at}gmail.com or Patrick.ansah{at}navrongo-hrc.org
