ABSTRACT
Pediatric traumatic brain injuries represent a public health concern globally. Epidemiological studies are essential to understand their extent, uncover risk factors and outcome predictors, and establish efficient prevention policies. Etiological investigations also benefit from epidemiological data. In young, pre-linguistic children, distinguishing between accidental and non-accidental trauma is often challenging for frontline clinicians. Classification errors can have severe repercussions for children and their families. Past influential epidemiological studies have drawn general conclusions about the etiology of pediatric traumatic brain injuries based on specific statistical information, such as hospital patient fatality rates after reported accidental falls. In this article, we use simple mathematical models to revisit one of these studies and discuss the reliability of its conclusion. We show that apparent paradoxical discrepancies, such as hospital patient fatality rates that are higher after short versus long falls, may have mathematical justification and do not necessarily justify seeking alternative etiological explanations such as non-accidental trauma.
Competing Interest Statement
At the time of this writing, Cyrille Rossant is the president of a French non-profit organization (Adikia) providing access to support groups to families facing contested medical determinations of child abuse (unpaid activity).
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon request to the authors
