Effect of rural trauma team development on outcomes of motorcycle related injuries: A protocol for a multi-center cluster randomized controlled clinical trial (The MOTOR trial)

Background and rationale {6a}

Transport-related injuries are a global public health threat, anticipated to rank fifth in the global burden of disease by 2030 [1]. Evidence suggests that 90% of transport-related crash mortality burden disproportionately occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) such as those in Africa [1], despite concerns of under-reporting [2]. The main cause of injury-related mortality in Africa are road traffic crashes [3] which have serious economic consequences [4]. Uganda is one of the LMICs in Africa with a high road traffic injury burden [5]. Our recent studies show that most of the fatal injuries in Uganda result from motorized two wheel-car collisions, contributing to (52.6%-64.7%) of orthopedic and traumatic brain injuries [6], [7], [8]. Further, the majority (74%) of Uganda’s population live in rural areas [9], which could partly explain its high injury-related mortality rates. Research show that the risk of trauma-related deaths in rural areas increases with remoteness due to health care disparities such as: large commute distances, scarce resources, delays in referrals, lack of skilled trauma care providers as well as population specific and contextual challenges such as poverty and impassable road networks [10].

Uganda lacks adequate universal access to trauma care and injury surveillance information systems due to limited human, infrastructure, and social security insurance resources for healthcare funding; thus its sluggish progress towards attaining sustainable development goal (SDG) III [11]. As such, in terms of level of specialty care, the ratio of surgeon: patient is 0.7: 25,000, notwithstanding the fact that interns and medical trainees contribute to more than 75% of the Uganda’s health workforce [12], [13]. Research show than more than half of the orthopedic and neuro trauma patients in Uganda do not receive first aid prior hospital arrival [6], [7]. Moreover, most of such patients arrive to their definitive trauma centers far beyond the recommended golden hour, either by public means such as motorcycles [8] or by police vans, without addressing the key determinants of trauma-related mortality such as blood pressure and oxygen circulation in transit [7], [14]. These factors have threefold implications. First, the need to strengthen capacity amongst lay responders. Secondly, the need to stabilize patients at rural regional trauma centers prior transfer, and lastly ensuring closed loop communication between lower (level 3) and higher (level 1) trauma centers. The key challenge to address in Ugandan rural settings is the lack of a formal pre-hospital care system as evidenced by emergency evacuation and transfer of trauma patients by untrained police [14]. Further, there is immense need to redress the weak immediate post-crash care response, it being that medical trainees are the first point of post-crash contact as opposed to specialists [12]. We visualize fixing these challenges at community level, and at level 3 rural trauma centers by creating and providing training capacity for rural trauma networks between traffic police and medical interns/trainees at regional referral hospitals.

Rationale

Evidence from two systematic reviews show that trauma education programs have potential for skills acquisition and knowledge retention amongst health professionals, however for the case of LMICs, most of such programs have not been locally contextualized, and have been largely assessed based on their theoretical merit rather than their clinical impact on patients [15], [16]. A recent observational study in Portugal showed that the European trauma course (ETC) improved self-efficacy and organization skills in individual routine practice but demanded that future investigations should be conducted to examine the effect of the training on trauma outcomes [17]. This European study together with systematic reviews in LMICs have recommended high-caliber epidemiological studies to evaluate the effect of such educational programs on process outcomes such as organizational efficiency, and on patient outcomes such as morbidity and mortality [15], [16], [18]. Except for the current ongoing trial comparing primary trauma course (PTC) to advanced life support (ATLS) and routine care in India [19], trauma education programs in LMICs have mostly been evaluated based on non-randomized studies which has limited their clinical uptake [15]. Moreover most of the programs limit the course participants to qualified hospital-based medical providers [18], while interns, medical and allied health trainees, and road traffic law enforcement professionals are the most readily available frontliners for injured patients in LMICs [14]. Inclusive planning while leveraging on services that have no trauma designation such as police is critical for expanding and strengthening complex rural trauma systems to improve injury reporting [2]. Locally contextualized trauma training has been identified as one of the most crucial steps to operationalizing nonfunctional rural trauma networks [10]. However in a scoping review by Brown et al [18], only twelve out of thirty four trauma courses in LMICs had been contextualized to suite low-income settings. Moreover, a cautiously executed integrative literature review on challenges faced by trauma systems recommend that the next step for future research should be an examination of how trauma training impacts outcomes of patients in remote environment [10]. This multi-center cluster randomized controlled trial will address this gap by examining the effect of a locally contextualized rural trauma team development course (RTTDC) of the American College of Surgeons [20] on process and patient outcome measures in Ugandan trauma centers. The trial will focus on musculoskeletal and neurological injuries which have been recently identified as the most important targets for strengthening health systems in rural Uganda [8], and is developed in accordance with the SPIRIT guidelines for reporting outcomes in trial protocols and the numbers in parentheses {} represent individual items in the SPIRIT checklist [21].

Objectives {7}

Trial design {8}

This will be a pragmatic two arm parallel cluster randomized, multi-period controlled clinical trial with one intervention (RTTDC) and one control arm (standard care). The trial had been set to start in 2019 but was disrupted due to Covid-19, and the subsequent prioritization of Covid-19 related studies by trial registers and targeted journals led to the delayed publication of this protocol. This trial will embrace simultaneous cluster randomization which is an ideal method for evaluating community level interventions to overcome ethical constraints that make randomization at individual level impractical, while avoiding probable contamination between control and treatment groups [22]. Moreover simultaneous randomization will enable timely operationalization and concurrent participant enrollment since all the outcomes will be measured as final values and there are no foreseen plans for study modifications in accordance with Esserman et al [23]. This arrangement is based on the fact that our previous studies already provided an insight on the likely loss to follow-up rates, baseline mortality rates amongst our targeted trauma population, and informed the feasibility and relevance of collecting the intended primary and secondary outcomes [6], [7].

Study setting {9}

This study will be conducted in six specialized teaching and regional referral hospitals in Uganda where RTTDC is not taught, including: Kiryandongo, Jinja, Hoima, Fort portal, Mubende and Kampala International University Hospital. These facilities have similar characteristics by serving as teaching, residency and internship sites for undergraduate, graduate medical doctors and nurses. The hospitals offer 24/7 emergency surgical services for trauma patients through multidisciplinary teams of orthopedic, general, and visiting neurosurgeons as well as imaging, rehabilitation, and physiotherapy. Each surgical department in these facilities is typically composed of about 1-4 faculty, 2-4 specialty residents often referred to as senior house officers (SHOs), 4-6 interns and 10-30 undergraduate medical trainees. These facilities are suited for this study since they serve both rural population and newly created populous cities that are still struggling with urban planning. Uganda is the 8^th and 30^th most populous country in Africa and worldwide respectively [9], and its trauma surveillance systems are in infancy stage with weak pre- and pos-crash response [6], [12]. Despite efforts made in the past decade by Ugandan government to address the unmet need for trauma care through infrastructure development, such as equipping operating theaters and intensive care units in public hospitals; limited standardized pre- and in-service trauma training, pre-hospital delays and human resource constraints still contribute to preventable trauma mortalities [14]. To guarantee the quality of data for this project, a prospective motorcycle trauma outcome registry (MOTOR) will be piloted at the participating six regional referral hospitals in parallel to this trial.

Eligibility criteria {10}

Inclusion criteria

1. Study sites: Level 3 trauma centers which are teaching hospitals, staffed with medical trainees, interns, surgery residents and consultants; offering 24/7 emergency surgical care with access to blood banks, ultrasound, X-ray, and CT scan as locally available or as outsourced services.

2. Trainee participants: Third year or fifth year medical or allied health students, interns or specialty residents in surgery and traumatology clinical rotations who will stay at the hospital of attachment for at least two-three months. In addition, we shall include road traffic law enforcement professionals concerned with evacuation of trauma patients from accident scenes.

3. Patient participants: Patients who sustain motorcycle-related injuries and present to study sites within 24 hours following crash as defined in previous studies [6]. These will include passengers on motorcycles, motorcycle riders, pedestrians hit by motorcycles, patient suffering from of motorcycle-motorcycle collisions or motorcycle-static object collisions, passengers on a motorcycle or cyclists suffering from motorcycle-car collisions.

Who will take informed consent? {26a}

Written informed consent will be obtained for both trainee and patient participants prior to participation. The participants or their legally authorized representatives (for minors and unconscious) will endorse a predesignated consent form document with their signatures in the presence of principal investigator or research assistants (surgery specialty residents). The official informed consent form documents for Mbarara University of Science and Technology (MUST) will be adopted for this purpose. Both trainee and patient participant informed consent documents are available as online supplementary materials 1 and 2 respectively. The ethical committees ruled that trainees involved in data collection process at control centers do not need to provide any consent since this study will neither directly affect their practices nor collect their personal data.

Additional consent provisions for collection and use of participant data and biological specimens {26b}

There will be no biological specimens retained for this study. The informed consent form documents will have provisions for consenting to follow-up, use of data for approved ancillary studies and for permission to archive the anonymized data on a public data repository.

Explanation for the choice of comparators {6b}

The intervention for this trial is the fourth edition of rural trauma team development course (RTTDC) of the American College of Surgeons [20], which will be delivered to medical trainees, interns, and traffic law enforcement professionals at the three intervention study centers (intervention group). Specialty surgical residents will be trained as faculty who later will serve as trainers since they directly supervise interns and undergraduate medical students in Ugandan settings. The research and ethics committees approved training residents as opposed to specialists to avoid constraining the scarce specialized human resource since this is a trainee-capacity building trauma education program. Moreover, consultants rarely attend to trauma patients for immediate resuscitation as the first point of contact in Ugandan settings. The patient participants at intervention sites will be those with motorcycle-related injuries at any of the study sites. The comparators in this trial are the control group of hospitals which will offer standard care to eligible patients, without their care providers receiving RTTDC training intervention.

Intervention description {11a}

The 2 day RTTDC interventional training will be conducted in designated spacious multimedia surgical simulation conference rooms at the study sites randomized to intervention arm, and will be delivered in its described standard format [20]. This training model was the most appropriate for Uganda, with its health worker: patient ratio of 1:25,000 serving its 48 million population [12]. The model dwells on team concept to improve coordination and efficiency of the existing “skeletal” health structure in rural environment. We hope to train a total of 66 road traffic police officers, 12 specialty residents, 30 intern doctors, 140 fifth year and 264 third year medical students. These figures were determined based on the average annual number of traffic law enforcement and trainees received at the respective regional police headquarters and hospitals respectively as detailed here [24]. Our target is to train at least 80% of each cohort of eligible trainees received every after 1-5 months within the surgery department during the four year study period until the required trainee and patient participant sample sizes are attained. If trainees drop out prior to completion of data collection, compensations will be made to maintain this criterion during the next cohort of surgical rotation trainee intake. The specifics of how the training will be conducted is detailed elsewhere [24]. The research core team agreed that trainee participants who will score more than 60% in post-training trauma based MCQs at intervention sites will be retained to form a rural trauma team network which will constitute multiple local “ six-team member trauma committees of first responders” with defined roles i.e., each team of five medical trainees having one contact road traffic officer.

To enable an active “alarm” activation criterion for the trauma committees, closed loop communication and smooth “handover” processes from police to medical trainees prior patient transfer, the trained traffic officers on highways will serve as focal contact persons for the rural trauma teams, beginning at parish (sub-county) level. Teammates will freely contact each other in the event of receiving a case of road traffic crash, both within and across teams to coordinate evacuation, consultations, referrals, and arrivals at recipient centers, with support of trained interns and surgery residents as team leaders. Weekly “audit meetings” will be conducted remotely via zoom to discuss team challenges, otherwise a trained surgery resident will be available 24/7 to advise on referrals, transfers, and treatments in liaison with consultants who may be physically or remotely available. The control hospitals in this trial will be left to provide their routine standard care without RTTDC intervention as summarized in Fig. 1.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig. 1: Conceptual framework summarizing interventions and interaction of variables

Criteria for discontinuing or modifying allocated interventions {11b}

The 4^th edition of RTTDC will be delivered in its standardized form [20] without any modifications.

Strategies to improve adherence to interventions {11c}

RTTDC is the intervention thus participants who will not be able to attend all the modules and complete the post training MCQs will be excluded. Adherence to RTTDC teachings amongst care providers during their clinical practice such as time taken from referral decision to execution and improper closed loop communication leading to loss to follow-up will be assessed as process measure outcomes.

Relevant concomitant care permitted or prohibited during the trial {11d}

The baseline quality of care given to trauma patients at each of the participating six hospitals is based on the regulations of the Uganda Medical and Dental Practitioners Council (UMDPC) which regulates medical practice and the National Council for Higher Education (NCHE) which regulates both undergraduate and graduate surgical curricula [25]. The councils require that graduating doctors undergo clinical rotations in surgery and traumatology, clerk, present and document trauma scenarios in patients’ case files. In addition, medical graduates should demonstrate competency in initiating emergency resuscitation in accordance with the advanced trauma life support protocols [26], such as execution of primary and secondary surveys, carefully discern, request and comprehend the necessary imaging and laboratory investigations in trauma, acknowledges self-knowledge and resource limitations and consults or refers patients whose surgical care demands exceed own skills or local trauma capacity. Further, upon graduation, Ugandan doctors would have to obtain a minimum of 48 hours of continuous professional development (CPD) points annually to maintain their licensure.

In terms of standards of care, both intervention and control facilities have medical trainees, interns, specialty residents and specialists who provide care for injured patients. The care typically involves receiving trauma patients who may be brought by staffed ambulances, police or public means to the accident and emergency units, and are received by trainees, interns, or surgical residents. These cadres open case files, initiate immediate care through horizontal consultations, request X-rays, CT scans and laboratory workup; plan definitive care or referrals in liaison with a senior surgical resident, and in consultation with a multidisciplinary team of specialists on call. As such, procedures such as surgical suturing and toileting, limb fracture casting and immobilization, chest tube insertions are often a business of interns. The more demanding splenectomies, external fixation of fractures and burr holes are a matter of specialty residents after notification of a consultant on duty whereas a major case of poly trauma would warranty the decision of a consultant specialist on call before the patient is taken to the operating room. The imaging and blood transfusion services are often freely available at the emergence units as government services but may be outsourced from private hospitals at a cost due to long waiting cues or when service maintenance such as for CT scanners and X-ray machines is underway. Finally, in terms of patient disposition, minor injuries that require surgery under local anesthesia are discharged on the same day, major trauma cases that require conservative treatment such as closed fractures are treated on surgical wards whereas those deeply unconscious or require critical care after major operations are admitted to the intensive care units (ICU) until they are fit for the care on general surgical wards prior discharge. Alternatively due to overcrowding, often with floor cases; patients with major trauma may be referred out and such common reasons for referral include further neurosurgical evaluation with MRI or by a neurosurgeon, need for multiple specialty care and rehabilitation, or for ICU admission elsewhere when the ICU beds are locally limited.

Provisions for post-trial care {30}

Any participants requiring further care beyond the 90-day follow-up will be linked to their attending clinicians during an additional three-months period after completion of the trial. There will be no compensation other than transport refunds for participants whose visits will be solely for the purposes of study follow-up outside routine clinical visits since this study was considered minimal risk by the approving research ethics committees. The principal investigator will refund the imaging costs for request approved by attending surgeons and radiologists in the unprecedented event of the services being unavailable free of charge.

Outcomes {12}

This trial will examine both process measures and patient outcomes. The primary (process) outcomes of this trial are to compare in hours (i) the prehospital time interval from accident scene to hospital admission, and (ii) the time interval from referral decision to hospital exit amongst patients with motorcycle-related injuries presenting at the intervention versus control study centers.

The secondary (patient) outcomes of this trial are to compare: (i) all-cause mortality at 90 days from time of injury, and (ii) morbidity of motorcycle-related orthopedic and neurological injuries presenting at intervention versus control study centers. The morbidity of orthopedic injuries will be measured based on trauma expectation factor score (TEFS) at admission and trauma outcome measure score (TOMS) at 90 days as reported to outcome assessors [27], whereas for neurological injuries, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) at admission and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at 90 days will be used as documented by the attending clinicians [28].

The tertiary outcomes will be the effect of the training on providers knowledge based on pre-and post-training trauma related MCQ scores and the barriers to injury care faced by providers during execution of definitive treatment and these will be determined in two ancillary studies that were approved as part of this trial whose protocols are detailed elsewhere [24]. A summary of all outcomes and their case definitions, specific measurement variables, analysis metrics, methods of aggregation and time points is available as online supplementary material 3.

These patient outcomes were selected for our trauma population based on their validity and relevance in previous studies [7], [29]. Further, level III evidence suggest that prolonged prehospital times may be associated with increased mortality of trauma patients [30] but how this relates to time-sensitive orthopedic and neurological injuries in LMICs which lack formal coordinated prehospital systems is mysterious [31]. Thus the process outcome measure variables were selected within the context of evidence-based practice which recommends the golden hour rule that warranty a major trauma patient seeking definitive care to be in the right place within 60 minutes following injury, otherwise mortality or morbidity may be eminent [32]. These variables align well with the proposed outcome data collection to guide resource allocation amongst vulnerable populations that seek emergency services to improve global surgery framework for national surgical, obstetric and anesthesia care provider plans [33]. In addition, the variables expand on outcomes for trauma informed interventions [34]. All outcomes will be measured as final values but will be discussed in relation to the baseline established in our prior feasibility studies [7], [29]. The comparisons in outcomes shall be made at both individual and cluster levels, using the mixed effects regression models.

Participant timeline {13}

First, cluster randomization of the trauma centers will be performed three weeks prior commencement of the training to determine which centers will receive the training. Potential participants for the training will be screened for eligibility by hospital and study administrators two weeks prior the training, and eligible trainee participants will be consented and assigned to “rural trauma teams” of six members on the first day of the training, during which they will complete a pre-training questionnaire on trauma based multiple choice questions (MCQs). Subsequently trainee participants will be followed up at 90 days (three months) to complete post-training MCQs. The first eligible patient participants at both control and intervention sites will be enrolled concurrently through a motorcycle trauma outcome registry (MOTOR) that will run parallel to the trial. Informed consent, baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and pre-hospital intervals will be obtained at admission as well as Glasgow Coma Score (GCS). The trauma expectation factor score (TESF) will be obtained during the first week of admission or prior discharge on assumption that patients would have received their definitive surgical intervention or referred for further care during this period. Further, the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS), all-cause mortality and trauma outcome measure score (TOMS) will be obtained at 90-day follow-up. The GCS assess the level of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the acute phase whereas the GOS determines neurological outcome within the context of level of independence at a later phase of TBI [28]. On the other hand, TOMS assess patient reported trauma outcomes with reference to their expectations (TEFS) at the time trauma intervention in relation to the level of pain, physical function, disability, injury treatment satisfaction and overall satisfaction [27], [29]. Throughout the study period, any individual patient barriers encountered during the pathway to execution of definitive injury care will be documented as summarized in timeline Fig. 2.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig 2. SPIRIT figure showing timelines

Sample size {14}

To estimate the sample size, we used the open source R shiny application for cluster randomized controlled trials with parallel design and discrete time decay correlation structures for multiple periods [35] available at https://clusterrcts.shinyapps.io/rshinyapp/. Further, we assumed t-distribution due to plans for small sample corrections at the analysis stage in accordance with Rutterford et al [36]. The study was approved for four years but the core research team foresaw it feasible to actively collect data for a period of 3 years putting into consideration university semester breaks, public holidays, and unexpected events. The three years (36 months) would yield 12 study periods given the planned training of cohorts of medical students on three-monthly basis in accordance with the average duration of internship deployment by the Ugandan ministry of health (1-5 months) and the average duration of surgery clinical rotation for university medical students (2-3 months).

Fixing the study power at 80% for parallel cluster randomized trials with different cross-sections and a discrete time decay period of every three months for a total of 12 periods, and assuming correlations to decay with each period, we explored the minimum number of patient participants (cluster size) required per period using R shiny application [35]. Assuming significance level of 0.05, within period intra-class correlation (ICC) of 0.02 (lower extreme 0.01; upper extreme 0.05), cluster autocorrelation coefficient (CAC) (the ratio of between period ICC to within-period ICC) of 0.8, allowing for varying cluster sizes with a coefficient of variation of 0.5; and based on a mean difference of 1.02 hours in prehospital transfer time and pooled standard deviation of 1.64 hours as continuous outcomes reported in a previous USA based observational study [37]; the upper ICC and base CAC plateaued between 5-10 participants (Fig. 3A). Taking the maximum of 10 participants per cluster period, 80% power could be attained (Fig. 3B); and could be met with a total of three clusters per arm (Fig 3C). This meant a total of 6 study centers (clusters) drawn from a pool of 17 which reasonably represents 35.3% of Uganda’s regional referral hospitals. The sample required per arm is a result of 10 participants per cluster period multiplied by 12 cluster periods multiplied by 3 clusters, yielding 360 participants. The total sample required for two arms would be 720. However, we inflated the sample and variance to cater for the clustering design effect, on assumption that this increases statistical power in accordance with Hemming et al [35]; thus derived sample size (s)= n (1+ (m-1) ρ; where s= required sample size, m =cluster size per period i.e., 10 and p=within period intra-class correlation (0.02), yielding 850 participants.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig. 3A: Reduction in number of clusters required as cluster-period size increases at fixed power of 0.8

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig. 3B: Showing cluster-period size of 10 meeting the 0.8 power requirement for 12 periods

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig. 3C: Showing 3 clusters per arm meeting minimum required power of 0.8 for 12 period

We shall add loss to follow-up rate of 18%, assuming the worst scenario based on our previous dropout rate of 9% in one of the feasibility studies [7]. Therefore, the final sample is approximately 1003 participants. Assuming an equal allocation ratio of 1:1 means 502 per arm and about 168 individuals per cluster. This sample is deemed feasible due to the high trauma burden in Uganda. According to a study at one of the Ugandan rural regional referral hospitals, a total of 900 motorcycle related injuries were recorded during a three year period of which 30.9% (278) and 15.8% (142) sustained musculoskeletal and neurological injuries respectively [8]. We shall not compute sample sizes for each individual secondary outcomes since previous studies did not report any difference in mortality [38].

Recruitment {15}

The training will be advertised by hospital administrators, class representatives and regional traffic law enforcement leaders and course participants will be recruited by the principal investigator and the respective hospital administrators. The patient participants will be recruited by dedicated project officers at the accident and emergency departments.

Sequence generation {16a}

We shall perform cluster randomization for a permuted block size of six hospitals (clusters) using an open source simulation software [39] available at (https://www.sealedenvelope.com/simple-randomiser/v1/lists), with seed numbers that will be kept confidential to the offsite study administrator. A list length of six random codes will be generated to assign hospitals as intervention or control groups. Since we plan to perform analyses at both individual level and treatment arm levels, we shall not add any stratification factors in the simulation model.

Concealment mechanism {16b}

The allocation sequence and assignment codes will be generated by and kept secret by an offsite study administrator. Both outcome assessors and patient participants will be blinded by the treatment allocation.

Implementation {16c}

Trainee participants will be enrolled by the respective university hospital administrators whereas patient participants will be enrolled by project medical officers at the respective study sites who will serve as outcome assessors.

Who will be blinded {17a}

The trial patient participants and outcome assessors will be blinded using blocked allocation sequence codes.

Procedure for unblinding if needed {17b}

Unblinding will only be permissible in the likely adverse event to the study participants that can be directly attributable to the study intervention. Such events will be discussed with the attending physicians. Otherwise, the allocation codes will only be revealed to the biostatistician at the time of interim analysis when half of the sample size is recruited. At that point unblinding the biostatistician is considered more beneficial to inform termination or continuation of the trial which outweighs the perceived fear of unknown bias [40].

Plans for assessment and collection of outcomes {18a}

Data collection will start simultaneously at all the study sites. Medical officers (blinded outcome assessors) with a minimum qualification of Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBChB), and at least two years of clinical experience will prospectively collect data through clinical observations, interviews, home visits, and extraction from hospital and police records. All outcome assessors must be willing to undertake a one day budgeted training in the use of data collection tools for this trial and WHO ICD-10 online coding module. The data will be collected daily since medical trainees and interns attend clinical rotations every day. Upon obtaining informed consent, the venue for data collection including follow-up information will be at the accident and emergence departments during admission, surgical wards, out patent clinics, home visits and through phone calls to patients, care takers or recipient hospital physicians in case of referrals.

The study variables will include sociodemographic and clinical such as sex, age, injury mechanisms including nature of collision and road user category, time of injury, prehospital transit time, prehospital care, mode of arrival, vital signs, nature of physical injuries, radiological findings, and injury severity based on GCS and Kampala Trauma Score (KTS) [41]. In addition, data on nature of treatment given, need for referral, referral-exit intervals, and outcomes including TOM, GOS, mortality and time from injury to death will be obtained. The data collection tools used in this trial such as GCS, GOS, TEFS, TOMS, KTS have demonstrated excellent criterion internal validity, consistence and reproducibility in previous studies [41], [27], [28], [42]. Further, the tools are recognized for their higher inter rater reliability, sensitivity to change, and ability to be used as continuous or categorical variables in validation studies [41], [27], [28], [42]. The baseline TEFS, GCS, KTS will be added as covariates whose interaction and confounding will be assessed and controlled since inclusion of baseline values of outcomes as covariates is arguably one of the strongest factors to reduce intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) estimates [43]. The difference in distribution of baseline characteristics will be compared using means (SD), medians (IQR) and ranges for quantitative data otherwise frequencies and percentages will be used for categorical variables. All data collection forms for this trial and detailed definitions of assessment tools are available in the protocol as supplementary material 4 and 5.

Plans to promote participant retention and complete follow-up {18b}

Coffee breaks will be facilitated during training to optimize participation. Phone and email contacts will be obtained from all medical trainees and law enforcement professionals. In addition, two phone contacts will be obtained for each patient participant at the time of enrollment at accident and emergency departments i.e., for the patient and their next of kin or legally authorized representative who will in turn be availed with the phone contact of the study nurse coordinators for purposes of follow-up. Automated reminders will be sent to data collection assistants through mobile phones and research electronic data capture (REDCap) platform. Where applicable, home visits will be conducted for participants who are unable to turn up for appointments because of their disability. Trasport refund will be reimbursed for traffic law enforcement professionals and patient participants turning up for appointments outside of the routine hospital visits. Participants will be considered as lost to follow-up if they are untraceable by phone, clinic appointment or home visit. Data on baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of those lost to follow-up or discontinued because of breach of intervention protocols will be retained for comparison between groups but that for withdrawals from consent will be deleted.

Data management {19}

Due to foreseen network breakdowns in rural centers, data will be collected in hard copies, coded and entered into the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) secure virtual network hosted by the University of Turku. Data entry will be performed by outcome assessors who will be issued with confidential login password for REDCap. Later, the data will be exported to Stata version 15.0 for analysis. The REDCap software was preferred due its presumed secure web-based intuitive interface for validated data capture, offering an additional advantage to prohibit dual entry, restrict values, calibrate data ranges, and retrieve audit trails for tracking data manipulation [44]. Further, the software permits seamless data export and download procedures that are compatible with Stata, while allowing for data integration and interoperability with external sources [45]. Any data errors will be resolved during weekly audit meetings in reference to the online codebook with visible description of variables accessible to the principal investigator and all outcome assessors.

Confidentiality {27}

To protect participants’ confidentiality before, during, and after the trial, all hard copy data collection items will be kept under lock and key and will bear unique non identifying codes. Soft copies will be kept in password protected computers with a second layer protection login password required for Redcap, only accessible by the study team. The final data sets will be anonymized prior to archive and publication. Hard copies of data will be destroyed six months after completion of the trial.

Plans for collection, laboratory evaluation and storage of biological specimens for genetic or molecular analysis in this trial/future use {33}

There are no plans to collect any biological laboratory specimens either for purposes of storage, genetic or molecular analysis in this trial.

Statistical methods for primary and secondary outcomes {20a}

Interim analyses {21b}

The Uganda National Council for Science and Technology accessed a preliminary report of interim analysis which were performed during 28 August 2022 when the half of the sample size (n=500) was attained and at its discretion recommended continuation of the study.

Methods for additional analyses (e.g., subgroup analyses) {20b}

Subgroup analyses will be performed for: (i) varying road user categories (pedestrian, passenger, motorcyclists), (ii) injury mechanisms (motorcycle-motorcycle crash, motorcycle-pedestrian crash, motorcycle-static object, motorcycle-car crash), (iii) varying injury severities (mild, moderate, or severe based on the Kampala Trauma Score and Glasgow Comma Scale) and (iv) multiplicity of serious injuries (one or multiple). To determine the training-effect heterogeneity across time periods, we shall use an extension of Hussey and Hughes fixed effects model [46], to determine whether the intervention effect differs for each training period as summarized in the schematic representation of study design in Fig. 4.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig. 4: Schematic representation of the study design

For ancillary study on provider outcomes, the difference in pre- and post-training mean scores will be computed at 95% CI if the data are normally distributed otherwise the difference in median and interquartile range will be reported. For the qualitative ancillary study on the perceived barriers to injury care, directed content analysis of themes of transcribed data will be collated manually and presented as percentages.

Methods in analysis to handle protocol non-adherence and any statistical methods to handle missing data {20c}

We shall impute values for participants with missing end points such as lost to follow-up, withdrew consent, and crossovers. The baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of such participants will be compared between the two treatment groups (intervention vs. control) and to those retained within the treatment groups. For individual participants, crossover from intervention to control group or vice versa due to any reason will result in ultimate discontinuation from the trial.

Plans to give access to the full protocol, participant level-data and statistical code {31c}

The full protocol will be published open access and anonymized participant-level datasets, and statistical codes will be shared publicly through a permanent weblink that will be provided by the publishing journal. Since the primary country of recruitment which approved and registered the study prior recruitment lacked a publicly available electronic research register, this protocol was retrospectively registered with WHO approved Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR202308851460352).

Composition of the coordinating centre and trial steering committee {5d}

The principal investigator and a central study administrator will form a steering committee that will run the day-to-day activities of the trial. The trial will have two onsite overseers and two off-site supervisors. In addition, the principal investigator will provide organizational support to rural trauma teams at the intervention study centers through weekly audit meetings. Each of the rural trauma teams is composed of a road traffic law enforcement professional, third year medical student, fifth year medical student, intern doctor or nurse and a specialty surgery resident.

Composition of the data monitoring committee, its role and reporting structure {21a}

The Research and Ethics Committee of Mbarara University of Science and Technology is the designated independent data monitoring committee (DMC) that will oversee this trial under reference number (MUREC 1/7; 05/5-19). The committee reports directly to the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology. The council at its discretion can recommend continuation, amendments, or termination of the trial at any time.

Adverse event reporting and harms {22}

Immediate medical concerns from participants will be reported to their attending clinicians. Any reported adverse events and other unintended effects of trial interventions or trial conduct will be reported to the trial monitoring committee.

Frequency and plans for auditing trial conduct {23}

The trial monitoring committees independently conduct annual and impromptu audits and may choose to extend or terminate the trial at any time. Such situations that could warranty termination include adverse events directly attributable to the study or the unlikely event of the trial achieving a meaningful difference in study outcomes between groups. The investigators will submit annual progress reports to the committees each year as part of continuing review.

Plans for communicating important protocol amendments to relevant parties (e.g., trial participants, ethical committees) {25}

Any protocol amendments will be submitted to the data monitoring committee. Any approved amendments will be communicated to Uganda National Council for Science and Technology, trial participants, and updated in the registries within five working days following approval.

Dissemination plans {31a}

Participants for the RTTDC training will get feedback after the post-test questionnaire evaluation. Patient participants will be advised on the next plans of management during follow-up calls or through out-patient consultations. Before study findings will be presented in scientific conferences and published in peer reviewed journals, a copy of findings in the final bound report will be submitted to the participating hospital main libraries, departments of surgery and Internal Review Boards of Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Kampala International University and Uganda National Council for Science and Technology. The implications of findings will be shared with to authorities including interns and medical students’ associations, district health officers, hospital directors, regional traffic police commanders and chairpersons of the motorcycle riders’ associations in the respective regions, and with the rural trauma networks of first responders. Priority will be made to present the preliminary findings at an international conference hosted in Uganda. Anonymized participant datasets from this trial will be archived on a publicly accessible permanent weblink that will be provided by the publishing journal within 12 months from the actual date of completion of the trial.