Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

“The impact of the Little Orange Book on how parents/carers manage symptoms of illness in children: A mixed methods study”

View ORCID ProfileAmy Johnson, View ORCID ProfileKathryn Carruthers, Matthew Breckons, View ORCID ProfileLynette Harland Shotton
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.05.23299502
Amy Johnson
1Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Amy Johnson
Kathryn Carruthers
2Department of Health and Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kathryn Carruthers
Matthew Breckons
3Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lynette Harland Shotton
4Department of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lynette Harland Shotton
  • For correspondence: lynette.shotton{at}northumbria.ac.uk
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Parental decision-making regarding children’s healthcare represents a complex and difficult process. While there is general agreement that information and education may play a key role in supporting self-care and the use of health services, there is potential for information to increase, as well as reduce anxiety.

Objectives This article summarises the key recommendations of an applied evaluation of a paediatric health resource, The Little Orange Book.

Methods A mixed-methods approach was used to collect data regarding parental perceptions on the health resource. Parents and carers in the North-East of England were invited to participate in an online survey and qualitative interviews. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis and quantitative data analysed using descriptive statistical analytical methods.

Results One-hundred-and-twenty-eight parents completed the online survey and 16 took part in interviews. Three themes were identified within the data: Increasing parental empowerment in managing their child’s health, Equality of Access to Health-based Literature and Barriers and Facilitators to using the Little Orange Book.

Conclusions The Little Orange Book has the potential to be a useful form of information to support parents and carers in healthcare decisions. Further development should ensure inclusivity, widen access and view provision of the information as an opportunity for healthcare professionals to engage with parents.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Yes

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethical approval to conduct the evaluation was obtained from Northumbria University Health and Life Sciences Ethics Committee (reference number: 41385).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Senior author: amy6.johnson{at}northumbria.ac.uk [AJ]

Data Availability

N/A

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 07, 2023.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
“The impact of the Little Orange Book on how parents/carers manage symptoms of illness in children: A mixed methods study”
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
“The impact of the Little Orange Book on how parents/carers manage symptoms of illness in children: A mixed methods study”
Amy Johnson, Kathryn Carruthers, Matthew Breckons, Lynette Harland Shotton
medRxiv 2023.12.05.23299502; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.05.23299502
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
“The impact of the Little Orange Book on how parents/carers manage symptoms of illness in children: A mixed methods study”
Amy Johnson, Kathryn Carruthers, Matthew Breckons, Lynette Harland Shotton
medRxiv 2023.12.05.23299502; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.05.23299502

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (427)
  • Allergy and Immunology (753)
  • Anesthesia (220)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3281)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (362)
  • Dermatology (274)
  • Emergency Medicine (478)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1164)
  • Epidemiology (13340)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (896)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5130)
  • Geriatric Medicine (479)
  • Health Economics (781)
  • Health Informatics (3253)
  • Health Policy (1138)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1189)
  • Hematology (427)
  • HIV/AIDS (1014)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14613)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (910)
  • Medical Education (475)
  • Medical Ethics (126)
  • Nephrology (522)
  • Neurology (4900)
  • Nursing (261)
  • Nutrition (725)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (879)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2516)
  • Ophthalmology (722)
  • Orthopedics (280)
  • Otolaryngology (346)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (539)
  • Pediatrics (1297)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (548)
  • Primary Care Research (554)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4193)
  • Public and Global Health (7482)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1702)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1010)
  • Respiratory Medicine (979)
  • Rheumatology (478)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (495)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (546)
  • Toxicology (71)
  • Transplantation (235)
  • Urology (203)