ABSTRACT
Introduction Routine blood tests play an essential role in modern healthcare, but their administration, processing, and reporting under the current centralized testing model is slow, inefficient, and cumbersome for patients and providers especially in outpatient settings.
Truvian’s benchtop blood testing platform, in late-stage development, aims to decentralize and streamline routine blood testing, replacing traditional send-outs to a central laboratory with a compact, easy-to-use benchtop platform at the point-of-action™ to ensure timely and actionable results between a patient and healthcare provider. Using only a small amount of blood from a single heparinized sample, the Truvian platform can simultaneously provide results for a full panel of routine blood tests spanning clinical chemistry, hematology, and immunoassays.
Evaluation of the Truvian platform in independent external studies is important to understand its performance in real world settings and to identify opportunities for improvement to complete development. To assess the performance of a comprehensive wellness panel on the Truvian platform, a multi-site study was completed at Truvian’s headquarters in San Diego, California, and at an independent clinical trial site in the Pacific Northwest. The study evaluated the panel’s precision and accuracy against central laboratory analyzers.
Methods Precision and accuracy studies were performed with a panel of 32 routine blood tests including immunoassay, clinical chemistry and hematology assays on the Truvian platform. Precision studies were run across multiple days and instruments to assess repeatability and reproducibility for each test in the panel. A method comparison study included 237 patients and compared the Truvian platform to best-in-class FDA cleared central laboratory analyzers – the Roche Cobas and Sysmex analyzers. Bland-Altman and either Passing-Bablok, or Deming regression analyses were used to determine agreement for each analyte in the panel. Additionally, linearity, sensitivity, and endogenous interfering substance studies were carried out for tests within the panel.
Results Overall, the Truvian platform had a run reliability rate of > 95%. In the precision and detection capability studies, the evaluated tests successfully satisfied all predefined criteria for precision, linearity, and sensitivity. Moreover, the method comparison study revealed concordance with central laboratory analyzers.
Conclusions This multi-site study demonstrated that the Truvian platform, currently in late-stage development, is capable of delivering the clinical performance and reliability needed for decentralized blood testing. The study also provided additional areas of focus to complete development.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors of this publication are employees of Truvian, the organization for which the research was conducted. As such, the authors declare the following competing interests: Financial Interests: The authors may have financial interests related to the outcomes of the research presented in this manuscript. These interests include employment and stock ownership in Truvian. Role of Truvian: Truvian funded and supported this research. The company played a role in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, and decision to publish. Intellectual Property: The authors may have intellectual property interests related to the research findings, which may include patents, patent applications, or other forms of intellectual property.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
WIRB-Copernicus Group IRB gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Abstract updated.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
