Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

How feasible is it to mobilize $31 billion a year for pandemic preparedness and response? An economic growth modelling analysis

View ORCID ProfileMinahil Shahid, Marco Schäferhoff, Garrett Brown, Gavin Yamey
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.29.23297740
Minahil Shahid
1Center for Policy Impact in Global Health
2Global Health Institute, Duke University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Minahil Shahid
  • For correspondence: shahid.minahil{at}gmail.com minahil.shahid{at}duke.edu
Marco Schäferhoff
3Open Consultants
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Garrett Brown
4University of Leeds
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gavin Yamey
1Center for Policy Impact in Global Health
2Global Health Institute, Duke University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Covid-19 has reinforced the strong health and economic case for investing in pandemic preparedness and response (PPR). The World Bank and World Health Organization (WHO) propose that low- and middle-income governments and donor countries should invest $31.1 billion each year for PPR. We analyse, based on the projected economic growth of countries between 2022 and 2027, how likely it is that low- and middle-income country governments and donors can mobilize the estimated funding.

Methods We modelled trends in economic growth to project domestic health spending by low- and middle-income governments and official development assistance (ODA) by donors for years 2022 to 2027. We modelled two scenarios for countries and donors – a constant and an optimistic scenario. Under the constant scenario we assume that countries and donors continue to dedicate the same proportion of their health spending and ODA as a share of gross domestic product (GDP) and gross national income (GNI), respectively, as they did during baseline (the latest year for which data are available). In the optimistic scenario, we assume a yearly increase of 2.5% in health spending as a share of GDP for countries and ODA as a share of GNI for donors.

Findings Our analysis shows that low-income countries would need to invest on average 37%, lower-middle income countries 9%, and upper-middle income countries 1%, of their total health spending on PPR each year under the constant scenario to meet the World Bank WHO targets. Donors would need to allocate on average 8% of their total ODA across all sectors to PPR each year to meet their target.

Conclusions The World Bank WHO targets for PPR will not be met unless low- and middle-income governments and donors spend a much higher share of their funding on PPR. Even under optimistic growth scenarios, low-income and lower-middle income countries will require increased support from global health donors. The donor target cannot be met using the yearly increase in ODA under any scenario. If the country and donor targets are not met, the highest-impact health security measures need to be prioritized for funding. Alternative sources of PPR financing could include global taxation (e.g., on financial transactions, carbon, or airline flights), cancelling debt, and addressing illicit financial flows. There is also a need for continued work on estimating current PPR costs and funding requirements in order to arrive at more enduring and reliable estimates.

Competing Interest Statement

Gavin Yamey and Minahil Shahid have received a research grant from the Carnegie Corporation of New York to study future approaches to the financing and distribution of pandemic vaccines.

Funding Statement

Garrett W. Brown from University of Leeds received funding from the UK Economic and Social Research Council under the project titled Reviewing Supranational Costs of Health Security Preparedness for WHO and G20 (REF: ES/X001482/1), and engaged Marco Schaferhoff from Open Consultants, and Minahil Shahid and Gavin Yamey from Duke University, as sub-contracts. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Competing interests Gavin Yamey and Minahil Shahid have received a research grant from the Carnegie Corporation of New York to study future approaches to the financing and distribution of pandemic vaccines.

Data Availability

We used publicly available datasets for our analysis. These include International Monetary Fund World Economic Outlook database, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Disbursements and Commitments of Official and Private Flows Statistics Database (DAC1, CRS), World Health Organization Global Health Expenditure Database, World Bank World Development Indicators

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 30, 2023.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
How feasible is it to mobilize $31 billion a year for pandemic preparedness and response? An economic growth modelling analysis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
How feasible is it to mobilize $31 billion a year for pandemic preparedness and response? An economic growth modelling analysis
Minahil Shahid, Marco Schäferhoff, Garrett Brown, Gavin Yamey
medRxiv 2023.10.29.23297740; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.29.23297740
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
How feasible is it to mobilize $31 billion a year for pandemic preparedness and response? An economic growth modelling analysis
Minahil Shahid, Marco Schäferhoff, Garrett Brown, Gavin Yamey
medRxiv 2023.10.29.23297740; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.29.23297740

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (430)
  • Allergy and Immunology (756)
  • Anesthesia (221)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3294)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (364)
  • Dermatology (279)
  • Emergency Medicine (479)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1171)
  • Epidemiology (13376)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (899)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5153)
  • Geriatric Medicine (482)
  • Health Economics (783)
  • Health Informatics (3269)
  • Health Policy (1140)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1190)
  • Hematology (431)
  • HIV/AIDS (1017)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14629)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (913)
  • Medical Education (477)
  • Medical Ethics (127)
  • Nephrology (523)
  • Neurology (4925)
  • Nursing (262)
  • Nutrition (730)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (883)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2524)
  • Ophthalmology (724)
  • Orthopedics (281)
  • Otolaryngology (347)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (543)
  • Pediatrics (1302)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (550)
  • Primary Care Research (557)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4212)
  • Public and Global Health (7504)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1706)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1013)
  • Respiratory Medicine (980)
  • Rheumatology (480)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (497)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (548)
  • Toxicology (72)
  • Transplantation (236)
  • Urology (205)