Abstract
Background Clinical education (CE) plays a crucial role in physical therapy education, yet there is a notable absence of established quality characteristics for its implementation.
Objectives This scoping review aims to elucidate how various stakeholders define and describe the quality of CE in higher education for physical therapy students. Additionally, it seeks to identify commonalities and distinctions in the application of the term “quality” in the context of CE.
Methods Peer-reviewed studies encompassing physical therapy students, clinical instructors, lecturers in physical therapy education, physical therapy educational sites, and supervising physical therapists in internships across all clinical fields will be included in the review. A comprehensive search strategy will be employed, utilizing multiple electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, ERIC, Education Research Complete, Education Database, and CINAHL. Eligibility screening will be independently conducted by two reviewers. Data extraction will be presented in a tabular or graphical format, aligning with the review’s objectives.
Discussion Insights gleaned from this study hold the potential to inform targeted interventions and improvements in CE, ultimately enhancing the learning outcomes and satisfaction of physical therapy students. This endeavor seeks to bridge the existing gap in defining and achieving quality in clinical education within the realm of physical therapy higher education.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
N/A
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. All relevant data from this study will be made available upon study completion.
