Abstract
Aims/ Background We aimed to adapt, test and explore experiences of the video feedback intervention for positive parenting (VIPP) for 2 to 6 month old babies and for mothers experiencing moderate to severe perinatal mental health difficulties.
Design/ Methods The VIPP intervention was adapted to include developmentally appropriate activities and developmental psychoeducation for 2 to 6 month olds, alongside psychoeducation on emotion regulation. Subsequently, the adapted intervention was trialled in 14 mothers experiencing moderate to severe perinatal mental health difficulties (registration ISRCTN64237883). Observational and self-reported pre-post outcome data was collected, and post-intervention qualitative interviews were conducted with participating mothers and clinicians.
Results Consent (67%), intervention completion (79%) and follow-up rates (93%) were high. Effect sizes on pre-post outcome measures indicated large improvements in parenting confidence and perceptions of the parent-infant relationship, and a medium-size improvement in maternal sensitivity. Qualitative interviews suggested that clinicians and mothers were able to use the video feedback to identify young babies’ subtle behavioural cues and moments of mother-infant connection, enhancing maternal sensitivity. Mothers’ initial anxieties about being filmed were overcome by the experience of receiving positive and strengths-focussed feedback, boosting their confidence in themselves as parents. The interviews also generated recommendations for minor modifications to optimise intervention feasibility and acceptability, such as streamlining the information provided on maternal emotion regulation, and allowing increased use of clinical judgement to tailor intervention delivery.
Conclusion VIPP can potentially be beneficial for enhancing maternal sensitivity with very young babies in mothers experiencing perinatal mental health difficulties.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
ISRCTN64237883
Funding Statement
The research was funded by a Barts Charity grant (MGU0585) to KB, MM and TL and a Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust Research Starter Grant to KB and MM. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the Barts Charity or Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The National Health Service Health Research Authority and the East of England - Cambridge South National Health Service Research Ethics Committee gave ethical approval for this work (ref 21/EE/0139).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.
