Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Generative AI Mitigates Representation Bias and Improves Model Fairness Through Synthetic Health Data

View ORCID ProfileRaffaele Marchesi, View ORCID ProfileNicolo Micheletti, View ORCID ProfileNicholas I-Hsien Kuo, View ORCID ProfileSebastiano Barbieri, View ORCID ProfileGiuseppe Jurman, View ORCID ProfileVenet Osmani
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.26.23296163
Raffaele Marchesi
1Fondazione Bruno Kessler Research Institute, Italy
2Department of Mathematics, University of Pavia, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Raffaele Marchesi
Nicolo Micheletti
1Fondazione Bruno Kessler Research Institute, Italy
3Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nicolo Micheletti
Nicholas I-Hsien Kuo
4Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nicholas I-Hsien Kuo
Sebastiano Barbieri
4Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Australia
5Queensland Digital Health Centre, University of Queensland, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sebastiano Barbieri
Giuseppe Jurman
1Fondazione Bruno Kessler Research Institute, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Giuseppe Jurman
Venet Osmani
6Digital Environment Research Institute (DERI), Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Venet Osmani
  • For correspondence: v.osmani{at}qmul.ac.uk
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Representation bias in health data can lead to unfair decisions and compromise the generalisability of research findings. As a consequence, underrepresented subpopulations, such as those from specific ethnic backgrounds or genders, do not benefit equally from clinical discoveries. Several approaches have been developed to mitigate representation bias, ranging from simple resampling methods, such as SMOTE, to recent approaches based on generative adversarial networks (GAN). However, generating high-dimensional time-series synthetic health data remains a significant challenge. In response, we devised a novel architecture (CA-GAN) that synthesises authentic, high-dimensional time series data. CA-GAN outperforms state-of-the-art methods in a qualitative and a quantitative evaluation while avoiding mode collapse, a serious GAN failure. We perform evaluation using 7535 patients with hypotension and sepsis from two diverse, real-world clinical datasets. We show that synthetic data generated by our CA-GAN improves model fairness in Black patients as well as female patients when evaluated separately for each subpopulation. Furthermore, CA-GAN generates authentic data of the minority class while faithfully maintaining the original distribution of data, resulting in improved performance in a downstream predictive task.

Author summary Doctors and other healthcare professionals are increasingly using Artificial Intelligence (AI) to make better decisions about patients’ diagnosis, suggest optimal treatments, and estimate patients’ future health risks. These AI systems learn from existing health data which might not accurately reflect the health of everyone, particularly people from certain racial or ethnic groups, genders, or those with lower incomes. This can mean the AI doesn’t work as well for these groups and could even make existing health disparities worse. To address this, we have developed a purposely built AI software that can create synthetic patient data. Synthetic data created by our software mimics real patient data without actually copying them, protecting patients’ privacy. Using our synthetic data results in more representative dataset of all groups, and ensures that AI algorithms learn to be fairer for all patients.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

None

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The data in MIMIC-III, where we extracted our datasets from, was previously de-identified, and the institutional review boards of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (No. 0403000206) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (2001-P-001699/14) both approved the use of the database for research.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Clarifications around figures and new experiments related to fairness.

Data Availability

The data underlying this article are freely available in the MIMIC-III repository

https://mimic.physionet.org/

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 27, 2025.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Generative AI Mitigates Representation Bias and Improves Model Fairness Through Synthetic Health Data
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Generative AI Mitigates Representation Bias and Improves Model Fairness Through Synthetic Health Data
Raffaele Marchesi, Nicolo Micheletti, Nicholas I-Hsien Kuo, Sebastiano Barbieri, Giuseppe Jurman, Venet Osmani
medRxiv 2023.09.26.23296163; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.26.23296163
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Generative AI Mitigates Representation Bias and Improves Model Fairness Through Synthetic Health Data
Raffaele Marchesi, Nicolo Micheletti, Nicholas I-Hsien Kuo, Sebastiano Barbieri, Giuseppe Jurman, Venet Osmani
medRxiv 2023.09.26.23296163; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.26.23296163

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (430)
  • Allergy and Immunology (756)
  • Anesthesia (221)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3294)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (364)
  • Dermatology (279)
  • Emergency Medicine (479)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1171)
  • Epidemiology (13376)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (899)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5153)
  • Geriatric Medicine (482)
  • Health Economics (783)
  • Health Informatics (3269)
  • Health Policy (1140)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1190)
  • Hematology (431)
  • HIV/AIDS (1017)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14629)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (913)
  • Medical Education (477)
  • Medical Ethics (127)
  • Nephrology (523)
  • Neurology (4925)
  • Nursing (262)
  • Nutrition (730)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (883)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2524)
  • Ophthalmology (724)
  • Orthopedics (281)
  • Otolaryngology (347)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (543)
  • Pediatrics (1302)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (550)
  • Primary Care Research (557)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4212)
  • Public and Global Health (7504)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1706)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1013)
  • Respiratory Medicine (980)
  • Rheumatology (480)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (497)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (548)
  • Toxicology (72)
  • Transplantation (236)
  • Urology (205)