Abstract
Objectives Inhibitory control deficits are considered a key pathogenic factor in anxiety disorders. To assess inhibitory control, the antisaccade task is a well-established measure, assessing antisaccade performance via latencies and error rates. The present study follows three aims: (1) to investigate inhibitory control via antisaccade latencies and errors in an antisaccade task, and their associations with multiple measures of fear in patients with spider phobia (SP) versus healthy controls (HC), (2) to investigate the modifiability of antisaccade performance via a fear-specific antisaccade training in patients with SP and HC, and (3) to explore associations between putative changes in antisaccade performance in SPs and diverse measures of fear following the training.
Methods Towards aim 1, we assess antisaccade latencies (primary outcome) and error rates (secondary outcome) in an emotional antisaccade task. Further, the baseline assessment includes assessments of psychophysiological, behavioral, and psychometric indices of fear in patients with SP and HCs. To address aim 2, we compare effects of a fear-specific antisaccade training with effects of a prosaccade training as a control condition. The primary and secondary outcomes are reassessed at a post-1-assessment in both SPs and HCs. Aim 3 employs a cross-over design and is piloted in patients with SP, only. Towards this aim, primary and secondary outcomes, as well as psychophysiological, behavioral, and psychometric measures of fear are reassessed at a post-2-assessment after the second training block.
Conclusion This study aims to better understand inhibitory control processes and their modifiability in spider phobia. If successful, antisaccade training may assist in the treatment of specific phobia by directly targeting the putative underlying inhibitory control deficits. This study has been preregistered with ISRCTN (ID: ISRCTN12918583) on 28th February 2022.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
ISRCTN12918583
Funding Statement
The study is funded by the DGPs (German Society for Psychology: Biological Psychology and Neuropsychology) and Movisens (Peer-Mentoring-Program, awarded to FB and KR), and the Innovative Medizinische Forschung (IMF) of the medical faculty of the University of Münster (awarded to EJL, grant numbers: ME121805 LE121904). AH is supported by the German Research Foundation (Research Training Group 2493/1: 398510439). Study materials were provided by Iris-Tatjana Kolassa and colleges and the Geneva Affective Picture Database (GAPED). The funders of the study are not involved in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study protocol was approved by the local Ethics Committee of the University of Siegen (07/2021), Germany (reference number: ER_39_2021). The study was designed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, Good Clinical Practice guidelines, and the SPIRIT reporting guidelines. During the run of the study, ethical, legal, and social aspects are anticipated and addressed. Participants provide written informed consent to the experimental procedure before inclusion in the study. Informed consent is obtained by research assistants conducting the interviews for eligibility. Participation is entirely voluntary, and participants have the right to withdraw their consent at any time. Participant information is pseudonymized and stored on a secure database and can only be accessed by the involved researchers and research assistants.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵a Shared first authorship
Contact: Anne.Hildebrand{at}uni-siegen.de, breuerfa{at}uni-muenster.de, leehr{at}uni-muenster.de, Johannes.Finke{at}uni-siegen.de, Leandra.Bucher{at}uni-siegen.de, Tim.Klucken{at}uni-siegen.de, udo.dannlowski{at}uni-muenster.de
Data Availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. All relevant data from this study will be made available uponrequest after study completion.
Abbreviations
- ABI
- an inventory of coping with anxiety
- ANOVA
- Analysis of Variance
- ANPS
- Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales
- ASI-3
- Anxiety Sensitivity Index
- BAS
- Behavioral Approach System
- BAT
- Behavioral Avoidance Test
- BIS
- Behavioral Inhibition System
- CERQ
- the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
- dB
- decibel
- ECG
- electrocardiography
- EMG
- electromyography
- FEAS
- Questionnaire on Disgust and Fear of Spiders
- FEE
- Disgust Responsiveness
- GAPED
- Geneva Affective Picture Database
- HC
- Healthy control participants
- Hz
- hertz
- ITI
- Inter-Trial-Interval
- m
- meters
- MINI
- Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview
- ms
- milliseconds
- MWT-B
- Multiple-Choice Vocabulary Intelligence Test
- n
- number of participants
- NISS
- Need Inventory of Sensation Seeking
- NEO-FFI
- NEO Five-Factor Inventory
- PANAS
- Positive and Negative Affect Schedule
- RSES
- Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale
- s
- seconds
- SCID-I
- Structured clinical interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV
- SCL
- Skin Conductance Level
- SEE
- Scales for experiencing emotions
- SP
- Patients with spider phobia
- SPQ
- Spider Phobia Questionnaire
- STAI
- State-Trait-Anxiety-Inventory
- UI-18
- Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale