ABSTRACT
Background Electronic medical records (EMR) is a useful tool to facilitate workflow and improve the quality of patient care and patient safety. Ocean Road Cancer Institute (ORCI) started the computerization of patients’ records and running of administrative tasks via a customized system.
Broad objective This study was designed to assess the extent of utilization, staff knowledge, and attitudes towards the EMR system at ORCI. A quantitative data collection tool was adopted and distributed.
Methodology The study was conducted at Ocean Road Cancer Institute (ORCI), a national tertiary centre located in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Of the 259 employees, a standard structured tool for data collection was applied to the 154 staff calculated sample size.
Results All the respondents (52) had a working experience of more than three months and had access to the EMR with 49 (94.2%) involved in direct patient care. 25(48.1%) were male and 27(51.9%) were female with a computer literacy rate of 92.3% (48). Only 2(3.8%) of the respondents held postgraduate degrees, and 25 (48.1%) each had diploma (college) and degree (university) level of education. 26(50%) felt the EMR was efficient and met user demands, 19(36.5%) felt it efficient but needing additional modification and only 4 (7.7%) felt it a wastage of time. Attitudes for the usage were fairly distributed with most claiming either slight increase (21, 40.4%) or increase (19,36.5%) quality of work but only 51.9% (27) felt the tasks became easier. 33(63.5%) of the respondents always use paper-based records together with EMR. Whereas 25(48.1%) felt the system provided precise information and 37(71.2%) agreed that the contents provided in the system met their needs, 15(28.8%) felt that the contents never met their needs and 27(51.9%) of the respondents felt that it is not precise. While majority (85%) overall were satisfied with the system and 31(59.6%) rating it as good. 5(9.6%) rated poor satisfaction and there was an even divide on finding the system complicated.
Conclusions Overall, hospital staff know the potential benefits of proper implementation and use of an EMR in capturing clinical care. However, without proper and continuous ICT support, the EMR will continue to struggle with its adaptability and user satisfaction.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by Ocean Road Cancer Institute
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB of Ocean Road Cancer Institute gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
