Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

The predictive capacity of polygenic risk scores for disease risk is only moderately influenced by imputation panels tailored to the target population

View ORCID ProfileHagai Levi, View ORCID ProfileRan Elkon, View ORCID ProfileRon Shamir
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.29.23294769
Hagai Levi
1Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
2Department of Human Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hagai Levi
Ran Elkon
2Department of Human Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ran Elkon
Ron Shamir
1Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ron Shamir
  • For correspondence: rshamir@tau.ac.il
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Polygenic risk scores (PRS) predict individuals’ genetic risk of developing complex diseases. They summarize the effect of many genetic variants discovered in genome-wide association studies (GWASs). However, to date, large GWASs exist primarily for the European population and the quality of PRS prediction declines when applied to target sets of other ethnicities. A key step in using a PRS is imputation, which is the inference of un-typed SNPs using a set of fully-sequenced individuals, called the imputation panel. The SNP genotypes called by the imputation process depend on the ethnic composition of the imputation panel. Several studies have shown that imputing genotypes using a panel that contains individuals of the same ethnicity as the genotyped individuals improves imputation accuracy. However, until now, there has been no systematic investigation into the influence of the ethnic composition of imputation panels on the accuracy of PRS predictions when applied to ethnic groups that differ from the population used in the GWAS.

In this study we estimated the effect of imputation of the target set on prediction accuracy of PRS when the discovery (GWAS) and the target sets come from different ethnic groups. We analyzed twelve binary phenotypes and three populations from the UK Biobank (Europeans, South-Asians, and Africans). We generated imputation panels from several ethnic groups, imputed the target set using each panel, and generated PRS to compute individuals’ risk scores. Then, we assessed the prediction accuracy obtained from each imputation panel. Our analysis indicates that using an imputation panel matched to the ethnic group of the target population yields only a marginal improvement and only under specific conditions. Hence, while a target-matched imputation panel can potentially improve prediction accuracy of European PRSs in non-EUR populations, the improvement is limited.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study was supported in part by grants from the Israeli Science Foundation (No. 3165/19, within the Israel Precision Medicine Partnership program, and No. 2206/22, to RS), from the Tel Aviv University Center for AI and Data Science (TAD) to RE and RS, by a joint program grant from the Cancer Biology Research Center, Djerassi Oncology Center, Edmond J. Safra Center for Bioinformatics and TAD to RE, and by the Koret-UC Berkeley-Tel Aviv University Initiative in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics to RE and RS. HL was supported in part by a fellowship from the Edmond J. Safra Center for Bioinformatics at Tel Aviv University.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study used (or will use) ONLY openly available human data that were originally located at the UK Biobank, dbGAP, and the Human Genome Phenome Archive

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request by the UK Biobank and dbGAP and the Human Genome Phenome Archive.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 29, 2023.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The predictive capacity of polygenic risk scores for disease risk is only moderately influenced by imputation panels tailored to the target population
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The predictive capacity of polygenic risk scores for disease risk is only moderately influenced by imputation panels tailored to the target population
Hagai Levi, Ran Elkon, Ron Shamir
medRxiv 2023.08.29.23294769; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.29.23294769
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The predictive capacity of polygenic risk scores for disease risk is only moderately influenced by imputation panels tailored to the target population
Hagai Levi, Ran Elkon, Ron Shamir
medRxiv 2023.08.29.23294769; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.29.23294769

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (271)
  • Allergy and Immunology (557)
  • Anesthesia (135)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1769)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (239)
  • Dermatology (173)
  • Emergency Medicine (316)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (662)
  • Epidemiology (10812)
  • Forensic Medicine (8)
  • Gastroenterology (594)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2960)
  • Geriatric Medicine (288)
  • Health Economics (534)
  • Health Informatics (1933)
  • Health Policy (836)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (745)
  • Hematology (293)
  • HIV/AIDS (633)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12525)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (696)
  • Medical Education (300)
  • Medical Ethics (87)
  • Nephrology (324)
  • Neurology (2809)
  • Nursing (152)
  • Nutrition (433)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (560)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (597)
  • Oncology (1473)
  • Ophthalmology (444)
  • Orthopedics (172)
  • Otolaryngology (257)
  • Pain Medicine (190)
  • Palliative Medicine (56)
  • Pathology (381)
  • Pediatrics (868)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (367)
  • Primary Care Research (338)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2647)
  • Public and Global Health (5383)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1016)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (597)
  • Respiratory Medicine (727)
  • Rheumatology (330)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (290)
  • Sports Medicine (279)
  • Surgery (327)
  • Toxicology (48)
  • Transplantation (150)
  • Urology (126)