Abstract
NATO has a requirement for a near real time surveillance (NRTS) tool to rapidly identify disease outbreaks but no deployable tool is available. The NATO Centre of Excellence for Military Medicine (MILMED COE) developed a NRTS tool and piloted it on the NATO Mission in Kosovo (KFOR).
Ten medical treatment facilities (MTFs) in KFOR piloted the tool which is an app on a smart device. All first presentations were eligible for inclusion into the app. Primary presenting symptoms were mapped to one or more of 40 symptoms. No patient identifiable information was collected. Analysis was available to each MTF and the Medical HQ staff (JMED) which provided a summary of the data collected. Combinations of symptoms resulted in an alert email to the JMED and MTF.
An evaluation was conducted at two time points consisting of data analysis and semi-structured interviews with key informants from each participating MTF and JMED team.
1351 patients were entered during the pilot. 851 reports had symptoms recorded. The leading symptoms were pain-in-throat, cough and temperature. Two investigations were launched based on reporting in the app; a cluster of skin lesions and two cases of diarrhoea. No significant outbreaks were reported during the pilot or detected by the app.
Interviews revealed that the app was easy to use and the symptom list was comprehensive. The analysis tool was not regularly viewed by MTFs however the JMED team used it frequently. Alerts were considered extremely valuable by both the MTFs and JMED team.
The KFOR pilot provided an excellent opportunity to pilot the tool in a NATO Mission and established that the way it collected data and alerted issues worked well. Further validation and analysis of the tool is required before it can be rolled out further.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The study was funded by the NATO Centre of Excellence for Military Medicine
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The UK Defence Joint Service Publication 536 Pt 2 Annex 1A states that no ethical review is required if the project is not research. The protocol defines this study as an audit and service evaluation which is NOT considered research therefore ethical review was not required in this case.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Competing Interests: No author or their institutions received any payments or services in the past 36 months from a third party that could be perceived to influence, or give the appearance of potentially influencing, the submitted work.
Funding Statement: This work was funded in full by the NATO Nations who form the Steering Committee of the NATO Centre of Excellence for Military Medicine.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
