Abstract
Objectives: Studies of retrospective personality change with dementia consistently find caregivers report large changes in personality (e.g., increases in neuroticism) of their care recipients compared to before dementia. This work seeks to replicate the established pattern of personality change, extend it to change in psychological distress, well-being, and social connection, and evaluate whether changes vary by stage of dementia. Methods: Caregivers of people with dementia (N=194) reported on the psychological and social health of their care recipient currently and how they were before they developed dementia. Personality was measured as five factor model traits. Psychological distress was measured as symptoms of depression and anxiety, perceived stress, and pessimism. Psychological well-being was measured as purpose in life, life satisfaction, happiness, self-efficacy, and optimism. Social connection was measured as loneliness, belonging, social support, and social strain. Results: There were substantial increases in neuroticism (d=1.10) and decreases in the other four personality traits (d range=-.82 to −1.31). There were significant increases in psychological distress (e.g., d=1.05 for depression) and substantial decreases in well-being (e.g., d=-1.07 for purpose in life) and social connection (e.g., d=-1.09 for belonging). Change was apparent across dementia stage and generally larger in more severe dementia. Discussion: In addition to personality, there are large retrospective changes in psychological distress, well-being, and social connection with dementia. These quantitative findings complement clinical observations of the natural history of psychosocial changes in people with dementia, and can inform families, clinicians, and researchers on commonly observed changes and improve interventions to mitigate dementia burden.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers R01AG053297, R01AG074573, and R01AG068093. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The protocol was approved by the institutional review board at the Florida State University (#STUDY00001134) and carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data for analyses reported in this manuscript are available publicly at https://osf.io/3mg82/?view_only=0193b4e5c89245c3b49b0a0f0822a90b
https://osf.io/3mg82/?view_only=0193b4e5c89245c3b49b0a0f0822a90b
