Abstract
Recent work leveraging artificial intelligence has offered promise to dissect disease heterogeneity by identifying complex intermediate brain phenotypes, called dimensional neuroimaging endophenotypes (DNEs). We advance the argument that these DNEs capture the degree of expression of respective neuroanatomical patterns measured, offering a dimensional neuroanatomical representation for studying disease heterogeneity and similarities of neurologic and neuropsychiatric diseases. We investigate the presence of nine DNEs derived from independent yet harmonized studies on Alzheimer’s disease, autism spectrum disorder, late-life depression, and schizophrenia in the UK Biobank study. Phenome-wide associations align with genome-wide associations, revealing 31 genomic loci (P-value<5×10−8/9) associated with the nine DNEs.The nine DNEs, along with their polygenic risk scores, significantly enhanced the predictive accuracy for 14 systemic disease categories, particularly for conditions related to mental health and the central nervous system, as well as mortality outcomes. These findings underscore the potential of the nine DNEs to capture the expression of disease-related brain phenotypes in individuals of the general population and to relate such measures with genetics, lifestyle factors, and chronic diseases.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
We gratefully acknowledge the support of the iSTAGING consortium, funded by the National Institute on Aging through grant RF1 AG054409 at the University of Pennsylvania (CD). We also acknowledge the funding provided by the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering at the University of Southern California through grant 5P41EB015922-25 (AT). Additionally, we acknowledge the funding program from the Rebecca L. Cooper Foundation at the University of Melbourne (AZ).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The current study used only the UK Biobank data under the application numbers: 35148 and 60698. No specific additional IRBs are required.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
We have anothre revision from the reviwers
Data Availability
The GWAS summary statistics and pre-trained AI models from this study are publicly accessible via the MEDICINE Knowledge Portal (https://labs-laboratory.com/medicine/) and Synapse (https://www.synapse.org/Synapse:syn64923248/wiki/630992102). Genomic loci annotation used data from FUMA (https://fuma.ctglab.nl/). UKBB data can be requested at https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/. GWAS summary data from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC) can be accessed at https://pgc.unc.edu/. MUSE atlas is generated via the pipeline at: https://github.com/CBICA/MUSE.
