Abstract
Stroke remains a leading cause of complications and mortality in heart failure patients treated with a Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD). Hemodynamics plays a central role underlying post-LVAD stroke risk and etiology. Yet, detailed quantitative assessment of hemodynamic variables and their relation to stroke outcomes in patients on LVAD support remains a challenge. Modalities for pre-implantation assessment of post-implantation hemodynamics can help address this challenge. We present an in silico hemodynamics analysis for a digital twin cohort 12 patients on LVAD support; 6 with reported stroke outcomes and 6 without. For each patient we created a post-implant twin with the LVAD outflow graft reconstructed from cardiac-gated CT images; and a pre-implant twin of an estimated baseline flow by removing the LVAD outflow graft and driving flow from the aortic valve opening. Hemodynamics was characterized using descriptors for helical flow, vortex generation, and wall shear stress. We observed higher average values for descriptors of positive helical flow, vortex generation, and wall shear stress, across the 6 cases with stroke outcomes when compared with cases without stroke. When the descriptors for LVAD-driven flow were compared against estimated pre-implantation flow, extent of positive helicity was higher, and vorticity and wall shear were lower in cases with stroke compared to those without. Our study suggests that quantitative analysis of hemodynamics after LVAD implantation; and hemodynamic alterations from a pre-implant flow scenario, can potentially reveal hidden information linked to stroke outcomes during LVAD support. This has broad implications on understanding stroke etiology; and using patient digital twins for LVAD treatment planning, surgical optimization, and efficacy assessment.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by a University of Colorado Anschutz-Boulder (AB) Nexus Research Collaboration Grant awarded to DM and JP; as well as partially supported by a National Institutes of Health Award (R21EB029736) awarded to DM. This work utilized resources from the University of Colorado Boulder Research Computing Group, which is supported by the National Science Foundation (awards ACI-1532235 and ACI-1532236), the University of Colorado Boulder, and Colorado State University.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee of the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (COMIRB) waived ethical approval for this work, and determined the study to be exempt.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* akshita.sahni{at}colorado.edu
↵† sreeparna.majee{at}colorado.edu
↵‡ jaydpal{at}uw.edu
↵§ erin.mcintyre{at}cuanschutz.edu
↵¶ kelly.cao{at}colorado.edu
The major changes include extra analysis of the hemodynamic descriptor data with significant updates to statistical analysis, including an analysis of the combined effect of the hemodynamic descriptors. We have added also extra details regarding the modeling methodology.
Data Availability
All simulations have been conducted using the open source SimVascular software tool. Imaging and quantitative simulation data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
