Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Validating an Approach for Estimating Appropriate Black Participation in Clinical Trials

Jeremy M. Berg, Juan C. Celedón, Naudia N. Jonassaint
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.24.23293100
Jeremy M. Berg
1University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
Ph.D.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jberg{at}pitt.edu
Juan C. Celedón
1University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
M.D., Dr.P.H.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Naudia N. Jonassaint
1University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
M.D., M.H.S., M.B.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Representation of different groups at appropriate levels in clinical trials is of great importance. Factors affecting what appropriate levels include the demographics at the trial sites and the prevalence of the condition under study in different populations. We examined 359 trials published in New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), and the Lancet in 2020 for information about Black participation rates. Sufficient information for analysis was available in 58 trials. Simulations including both site demographics and prevalence factors revealed that observed Black participation rates were reasonably well correlated with estimated potential Black participation rates, but that actual participation rates were lower than potential rates in 47 out of 58 trials. This approach could be used to estimate appropriate participation rates prior to trial initiation and for analysis of trials upon completion. Promotion of such transparency standards will aid future analyses and should help drive improvements in representation over time.

Clinical trials represent important opportunities to test potential interventions in groups of individuals who can provide meaningful data and who represent populations who might benefit from the trial results. This has been described and highlighted by the recent report “Improving Representation in Clinical Trials and Research: Building Research Equity for Women and Underrepresented Groups” from the United States National Academy of Sciences1. One of the overarching conclusions from this report is:

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data are presented in supplementary material

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 27, 2023.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Validating an Approach for Estimating Appropriate Black Participation in Clinical Trials
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Validating an Approach for Estimating Appropriate Black Participation in Clinical Trials
Jeremy M. Berg, Juan C. Celedón, Naudia N. Jonassaint
medRxiv 2023.07.24.23293100; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.24.23293100
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Validating an Approach for Estimating Appropriate Black Participation in Clinical Trials
Jeremy M. Berg, Juan C. Celedón, Naudia N. Jonassaint
medRxiv 2023.07.24.23293100; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.24.23293100

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Policy
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (428)
  • Allergy and Immunology (753)
  • Anesthesia (220)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3286)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (362)
  • Dermatology (276)
  • Emergency Medicine (478)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1168)
  • Epidemiology (13348)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (898)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5140)
  • Geriatric Medicine (480)
  • Health Economics (781)
  • Health Informatics (3260)
  • Health Policy (1140)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1189)
  • Hematology (429)
  • HIV/AIDS (1015)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14618)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (912)
  • Medical Education (476)
  • Medical Ethics (126)
  • Nephrology (522)
  • Neurology (4914)
  • Nursing (262)
  • Nutrition (725)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (880)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2517)
  • Ophthalmology (722)
  • Orthopedics (280)
  • Otolaryngology (347)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (542)
  • Pediatrics (1299)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (549)
  • Primary Care Research (555)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4198)
  • Public and Global Health (7489)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1703)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1010)
  • Respiratory Medicine (979)
  • Rheumatology (479)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (496)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (547)
  • Toxicology (72)
  • Transplantation (235)
  • Urology (204)