Abstract
Objective To compare the risks of gastric cancer and other gastric diseases upon exposed to sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2I), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4I) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1A).
Design This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of prospectively recorded data on type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients prescribed either SGLT2I or DPP4I between January 1st 2015 and December 31st 2020 from Hong Kong. The primary outcome was new- onset gastric cancer, peptic ulcer (PU), acute gastritis, non-acute gastritis, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Propensity score matching (1:1 ratio) using the nearest neighbour search was performed and multivariable Cox regression was carried out. A three-arm analysis including the GLP1A cohort was subsequently conducted.
Results A total of 62858 T2DM patients (median age: 62.2 years old [SD: 12.8]; 55.93% males; SGLT2I: n=23442; DPP4I: n=39416) were included. After matching, the incidence of gastric cancer was significantly lower in SGLT2I users (Incidence rate, IR: 0.32; 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.23-0.43) than DPP4I users (IR: 1.22; CI: 1.03-1.42). SGLT2I use was associated with lower risks of gastric cancer (HR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.19-0.48) after adjusting for significant covariates compared to DPP4I use. SGLT2 use was also associated with lower risks of PU, acute gastritis, non-acute gastritis, and GERD (all p<0.05). The three-arm analysis demonstrated higher risks of gastric cancer and GERD in GLP1A than in SGLT2I.
Conclusions SGLT2I was associated with lower risks of new-onset gastric cancer, PU, acute gastritis, non-acute gastritis, and GERD after matching and adjustments compared to DPP4I.
What is already known on this topic T2DM was associated with higher risks of gastric cancer. Anti-diabetic drugs such as SGLT2I and DPP4I are commonly used second-line drugs to help manage diabetes mellitus. SGLT2I was previously suggested to lower the risks of cancer compared to DPP4I.
What this study adds In this population-based cohort study, SGLT2I was associated with a 70% lower risk of gastric cancer, 34% low risks of peptic ulcer, 69% lower risks of acute gastritis, 65% low risks of non-acute gastritis, and 38% of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) than DPP4I users. The three arm sensitivity analysis involving DPP4I and GLP1A using stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting demonstrated higher risks of gastric cancer and GERD in GLP1A users compared to SGLT2I users.
How this study might affect research, practice or policy The findings of this study may influence the choice of novel second-line anti-diabetic therapy in T2DM patients in terms of the gastric safety profile especially gastric cancer. This study may inspire further mechanistic studies and studies on the long-term cancer benefits of SGLT2I.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster and The Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong-New Territories East Cluster.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
