Abstract
Background Rehabilitation is the mainstay of management for people with disabilities of neurological origin to maximize function and reduce disability. Access to in-patient rehabilitation is usually reserved for people after crises or those who are discharged from acute care such as in stroke or trauma. Access to people with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) differs across countries and unknown for Canada. With the progression of MS, quality of life (QOL) becomes more closely coupled with independence and hence timely access to rehabilitation is important. The objectives of this paper are (i) to characterize the disability profiles of people with MS admitted to in-patient rehabilitation in Canada; and (ii) to estimate the extent to which disability profiles differ from admission to discharge.
Methods A longitudinal study of a rehabilitation admission-to-discharge cohort of 3500 people with MS was conducting using latent class analysis on the five Functional Independence Measure (FIM) subscales for Self-care, Transfers, Locomotion, Bladder/Bowel, and Cognition. The extent to which age, sex, and calendar time was associated with latent class membership, at both admission and discharge, was estimated using ordinal logistic regression, and proportional odds model was calculated for each age and sex.
Results A five-class model fit the data at admission and a four-class model fit the data at discharge determined using likelihood ratio G2, Akaike’s Information Criterion, and Bayesian Information Criterion.
Conclusion At admission, the disability profiles showed a hierarchical progression across the FIM subscales. The least disabled profile was characterized by locomotion dependency only; the most disabled profile was characterized by dependencies in all subscales except cognition. At discharge, the least disabled class, representing 28% of discharges, was characterized by no dependencies; the most disabled class remained with dependencies (23%) in all areas. The study highlights the importance of reserving scarce rehabilitation services to those with more disability.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was not funded.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data is not available
