ABSTRACT
Introduction Renal stone is a fairly common presentation and the pain is unbearable. Some patients have tendency that stones are frequently formed and management of that s necessary as removal of stone is nt always that simple and can lead to many complications.
Aims and Objectives To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effect of dietary calcium on the prevention of calcium stones.
Methodology PubMed, google scholar and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies. The search strategy and study selection process was conducted by following the PRISMA statement. 16 articles were identified after meeting the inclusion criteria.
Results Our results showed that with high calcium advice, occurrence of stone formation decreases (RR=0.82, CI95=0.37-1.82, p=0.63). Comparing levels of Urinary caclium with advice of high calcium diet showed increased excretion (SMD=1.99), but decreased excretion with low calcium diet (SMD = -0.43) and Normal calcium diet (SMD = -1.35). An almost no difference can be seen in Urinary oxalate with high calcium (SMD = 0.00), low calcium (SMD = 0.02), Normal Calcium (SMD = -0.052). Results showed that Urinary Urate levels decreased with all types of diet mainly with High calcium diet (SMD = -0.33), then Low calcium diet (SMD = -0.28)and then normal calcium (SMD = -0.22). Urinary Volume was increased with all dietary advice, the most with low calcium diet(SMD = 216.37), then normal calcium diet (SMD = 206.81) and last high calcium diet (SMD = 20.00).
Conclusion ur study shows high calcium diet decreases the occurrence of stones compared to normal calcium and low calcium diet.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
devhdesai01{at}gmail.com, Devu.andharia98{at}gmail.com, Dwijaraval2005{at}gmail.com
Disclosure by Authors:
All the authors state that none have any conflict of interest
The article is submitted with permission of all the authors
No Financial gain has been acquired nor any authors have financial conflict.
Being a systemic review, the article does not require any IRB/IEC permission.
In the manuscript, It is Indicated that Dev Himanshubhai Desai is the corresponding author while Tanvi Sahni is the corresponding author. That mistake is being changed along with the mistake of the middle name in Author Dev Desai
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
