Social, environmental and economic determinants of sleep disturbances in Latin America: A systematic review and a meta-analysis of public health literature

Filipa Torres Silva, Rita Queiroz Rodrigues, Margarida Carvalho, Sofia Zoukal, Gabriel Cordova Zarate, Faustin Armel Etindele Sosso
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.02.23290915

Abstract

Mental health recovery is associated to a healthy sleep and disturbances of both, represents an increasing public health issue in the world in general and in Latin America in particular. Among multiple determinants affecting sleep health, individual’s socioeconomic status (SES) is the most ignored and underestimated through literature. No systematic review on the relation between SES and sleep health has been previously conducted in Latin America. Following Prisma protocol, twenty articles were included in the final sample, all cross-sectional studies. Among these studies, 80,0% (n=16) were performed in Brazil, 10,0% (n=2) in Peru, 5,0% (n=1) in Chile, and 5,0% (n=1) were multicentric (11 countries). The combined total number of participants were N=128455, being 3,7% (n= 4693) children, 16,0% (n= 20586) adolescents and 80,3% (n=103176) adults. The most used determinants were income (monthly personal income, monthly family income, per capita income, annual household income), wealth/assets, number of residents in the household, employment status/occupation, accessed healthcare system and composite indices. The sleep outcomes analyzed were excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), sleep duration, sleep quality/sleep disturbance, insomnia, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA)/sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) symptoms and bruxism. Higher SES was associated with lower sleep duration. Lower SES was associated with a decrease in sleep quality. EDS was significantly more prevalent in individuals with lower family income and less education. Sleep bruxism was associated with higher education and lower SES was associated with more sleep bruxism. For the 20 articles included, 12 were rated as fair or poor in study quality. Therefore, a meta-analysis was performed to estimate the prevalence of sleep disturbances in Latin America and the main SES risk factors that could be associated with it. The pooled prevalence using a meta-analysis of the random effects model was 27.32 % (95 % CI 21.71–33.75), with high heterogeneity (I2 = 100 %). The meta-analysis showed that the prevalence of sleep disturbances decreased by high education (OR 0.83; 95%CI [0.75-0.91]; I2= 79%), while it increased by low income (OR 1.26; 95%CI [1.12-1.42]; I2= 59%), no working (OR 2.84; 95%CI [2.14-3.76]; I2= 0%) or being housewife (OR 1.72; 95%CI [1.19-2.48]; I2=55.4%).

1 INTRODUCTION

Promoting recovery in mental health is an ongoing project which never ends, because mental health is a complex public health outcome requiring multidimensional interventions at the economic level, the populational level and societal level [1, 2]. Mental health is also highly dependent of sleep which have a recognized impact on several brains functions [3] and global health status as well as stress [4]. In addition, sleep have a significant influence on mental health due to its relationship with people’s socioeconomic status (SES) and its connexion with multiple biological systems involved in neurological disorders such as anxiety [1, 5–10]. That’s means in others words that, sleep disturbances are mental disorders resulting from complex socioecological and economic interactions between brain, society where we live, global health and SES [7, 11, 12]. Thus, sleep health inequalities represents a mental health outcome similar to public health issues previously reported for cardiovascular, mental health and metabolic diseases [11]. Empirical literature in western countries seems validated the hypothesis stating that, low SES individuals reported more sleep disturbances than high SES people [13–18]. Similar evidence exist in Asia [19, 20] and Oceania [21, 22]. Thus, sleep health disparity could be a public health issue in other area like Africa and Latin America. Few studies documented sleep health disparities in South and Central America due to a wide range of determinants such as employment, income, education, occupation and social position [11, 23–25]. An exhaustive evaluation of public health literature related to Latin America revealed that no systematic review on the relation between SES and sleep health has been previously conducted in Latin America. It’s important to analyze if trends related to the influence of SES determinants of mental health on sleep health observed in western countries are following the same patterns in Latin America. The goals of this systematic review are to 1) document the socioeconomic determinants of sleep health in Latin America and 2) to promote the mental health recovery related to a good sleep health.

2 METHODS

2.1 Literature search

Relevant peer review studies included in this systematic review were identified by searching the following databases: Web of Science, PubMed/Medline and Google scholar between January 1990 and July 2022. A combination of terms “socioeconomic”, “socio-economic”, position’’, ‘’social class’’, ‘’socioeconomic position’’, “determinant*”, “indicators*”, “markers*”, “health inequalities”, “sleep”, ‘’sleep disorders’’ disturbances’’, ‘’sleep complains’’, “sleep outcome”, “sleep health”, “south america*”, “central america*”, “latin america” was used. All included were identified following the PRISMA guidelines detailed in Figure 1 [25].

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

PRISMA flowchart of study selection process

2.2 Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Empirical studies were defined as of any design (cross-sectional, retrospective or longitudinal) assessing humans of any gender, race/ethnicity and age from the general population of any country from Latin America. The article should include an objective or a subjective measure of SES, such as income, educational level, wealth, profession/occupation, employment status, perceived SES or self-reported SES. Proxy measure of SES such as neighborhood and social class were also included. For articles with samples composed of children and adolescents, perceived family SES measures such as parental education, parental occupation or annual household income were used instead. Studies were excluded based on the following criteria: 1) They were interventional trials, every type of reviews (narrative, overview, systematic, umbrella, meta-analyses), case series, case reports, conference series or any writing without original research (editorial, commentary, letter to editors), 2) articles did not provide statistical significance in cases where either SES or sleep were evaluated as covariates or mediators, 3) the full text was not accessible, 4) authors/researchers recruited participants with medical conditions at the beginning of study (for example people with medications including sleep pills, people with cancers, people with neurodegenerative diseases, etc.…) and 5) articles were not written in English, French, Portuguese and Spanish (languages of authors).

2.3 Quality rating of studies

The National Institute of Health’s (NIH) Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies was used to rate the quality of included studies [26]. This quality rating’s tool analyzed fourteen quality criteria asking equal number of questions about study objectives, population, exposures, outcomes, follow-up rates, and statistical analysis. SES was considered the exposure variable and sleep measures the outcome variable, respectively. Overall quality ratings (Table 2) were calculated by taking the proportion of positive rating on the sum of applicable criteria. Studies with < 50% positive rating were judged as poor quality, ≥ 65% as good quality and the rest as fair quality [26].

2.4 Study outcomes

The primary outcomes were the prevalence of sleep disturbances in Latin America, and sleep length in men compared with women. The secondary outcomes were to explore how SES influences the prevalence of sleep disturbance in Latin America. These were explored through analysis for education, income, employment status and perceived SES, if they were reported by at least two independent studies.

2.5 Data analysis

Meta-analysis was performed using the meta package on R with RStudio interface (Version 4.1.3, R Core Team, 2022) to analyze the collected data. In each study, the prevalence of sleeping disturbances in Latin America was obtained. Studies did not report the prevalence are excluded. The random effects model was used with the logit transformation for obtaining the pooled results, because it produces more conservative results than fixed-effects models regardless of heterogenicity scores [27]. The pooled prevalence estimates of sleeping disturbances in Latin America was presented as a percentage with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a forest plot. Also, a subgroup analysis was conducted for different sleep issues, cities, study’s quality and age group to assess the contribution of each study to overall heterogeneity in the prevalence of sleep disturbance.

To measure the relationship between SES and sleeping disturbances, we extracted from the selected publications the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with 95% CIs. Their standard errors were calculated from the respective CIs. The value from each study and the corresponding standard error were transformed into their natural logarithms to stabilize the variances and to normalize the distribution. The pooled OR (and 95%CI) was estimated using a DeirSimonian-Laird random effect model. In situations in which a study reported effect estimates for independent subgroups, the subgroups were treated as individual studies in the meta-analysis.

The test of the overall effect was assessed by using Z-statistics at p<0.05. The heterogeneity among the included studies was assessed using Cochran’s Q test and I2 statistics. The thresholds of 25%, 50%, and 75% were used to indicate low, moderate, and high heterogeneity, respectively [28, 29]. A funnel plot based on Egger’s regression test was used to evaluate the publication bias [30]. In all analysis, a p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3 RESULTS

3.1 Characteristics of included articles

Twenty articles were included [31–50] in the final sample, all cross-sectional studies and available in Table 1. Among these studies, 80,0% (n=16) were performed in Brazil [31–33, 35, 37, 38, 41–50], 10,0% (n=2) in Peru [39, 40], 5,0% (n=1) in Chile [34], and 5,0% (n=1) were multicentric (11 countries)[36]. The combined total number of participants were N=128455, being 3,7% (n= 4693) children, 16,0% (n= 20586) adolescents [38, 39, 41, 42, 45] and 80,3% (n=103176) adults [31–37, 39, 40, 46–50]. The smallest sample was n=851 [43] and the largest was n=60202 [49]. The socioeconomic indicators used were income (monthly personal income, monthly family income, per capita income, annual household income) [31–35, 37, 38, 41, 43–47], wealth/assets [37, 39, 40, 49, 50], number of residents in the household [46], employment status/occupation [31, 32, 34, 35, 37–39, 46, 47, 50], accessed healthcare system [37] and composite indices [42]. The sleep variables used were excessive daytime sleepiness [32, 40, 49], sleep duration [37–39, 41, 44–46, 50], sleep quality/sleep disturbance [33, 34, 36, 38, 44, 47, 49], insomnia [31, 36], obstructive sleep apnea (OSA)/sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) symptoms [35, 40] and bruxism [42, 43, 48]. Majority of articles have a poor quality (55%) and detailed qualitative evaluation is available in Table 2.

View this table:
Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies investigating determinants of sleep health recovery in Latin America.

View this table:
Table 2:

Quality of the included studies using the NIH quality assessment tool

1. Etindele Sosso, F.A., Measuring Sleep Health Disparities with Polysomnography: A Systematic Review of Preliminary Findings. Clocks Sleep, 2022. 4(1): p. 80-87.

2. Sosso, F.E. and T. Khoury, Socioeconomic status and sleep disturbances among pediatric population: a continental systematic review of empirical research. Sleep Sci, 2021. 14(3): p. 245-256.

3.2 Descriptive synthesis of articles

Quantitative analyses are presented in the results section. Presented below is a descriptive analysis, which provides a deeper examination of the overall findings that were not considered in the quantitative analysis. Table 1 presents details of the individual studies included in the descriptive analysis.

Sleep duration

Seven cross-sectional studies accessed the relation between socioeconomic status (SES) and sleep duration [37–39, 41, 44, 46, 50]. One of these was conducted with children (from 3 to 48 months old) [44], two with adolescents (12 to 19 years old) [38, 41], three with adults [37, 46, 50] and one with adolescents and adults [39].

Overall, higher SES was associated with lower sleep duration. Specifically, highest level of education [37–39, 41, 46], being employed [37–39, 46], higher income [38, 39, 41, 46] and living with more residents [46] were associated with shorter sleep duration in samples of adults and adolescents. In addition, long sleep was more prevalent among housewives [37], adolescents with black maternal skin color [41] and whose mothers had lower schooling [41]. In contrast, poorest wealth index and not working or studying were associated with lower sleep percentage in another study with adults[50]. One study found no consistent associations between sleep duration and maternal education or family income in children [44]. The overall quality of the studies selected was good for three studies [38, 41, 41] and fair for four studies [37, 39, 44].

Sleep quality/sleep disturbance

Eight cross-sectional studies assessed the relation between sleep quality or disturbance and SES [33, 34, 36, 38, 44, 45, 47, 49]. One of these was conducted with infants (from 3 to 48 months) [44] two with students (14 to 19 years old) [38, 45] and the others with adults [33, 33, 47, 49]. One study focused only on adult women [36]. The overall quality of the studies selected was good for three studies [36, 38, 45], fair for three studies [33, 34, 47] and poor for one study [49].

Globally, lower SES was associated with diminished sleep quality. Explicitly, low income [33, 38] and unemployment [34, 47] were associated with impaired sleep quality. Two studies showed a higher prevalence of sleep disturbance in women [34, 47]. More educated adults had significantly less sleep disturbance [33, 36, 49]. In contrast, a higher maternal education was associated with lower quality of sleep in students [45], but such association was not found in infants in one study [44]. Psychiatric comorbidities [33, 34], alcohol and drug consumption [34, 36] were also associated with sleep disturbance.

Insomnia

Concerning insomnia, two cross-sectional studies assessed its relationship with SES [31, 36]. One study evaluated only women [36] and one study adults in general[31]. The overall quality of the two studies was good.

In two of the aforementioned studies, insomnia was independently associated with individuals with less education [31, 36]. Alcohol and drug consumption was also associated with insomnia, according to one study [36].

Excessive daytime sleepiness

Three cross-sectional studies approached the association between excessive daytime sleepiness and SES [32, 40, 49]. All studies assessed adults. The overall quality of the studies selected was good for one study [32], fair for one study [40] and poor for one study [49].

Largely, excessive daytime sleepiness was associated with lower SES in one study [40].Additionally, it was also significantly more prevalent in individuals with lower family income [32] and less education [49].

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) / Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) symptoms

Concerning OSA/SDB, two cross-sectional studies assessed its relationship with SES [35, 40]. Both studies evaluated adults in general. The overall quality was good in one study [35] and fair for the other study [40].

In one study, lower SES was associated with less frequent snoring. However, no significant association was found between SES and observed apneas [35]. The other study did not find any association between SES and OSA [40].

Bruxism

Three cross-sectional studies assessed the relation between SES and bruxism [42, 43, 48]. One of the studies was conducted with infants (children 6-12 years old)[43], one with adolescents (13-15 years old) [42] and the last one with adults [48]. The overall quality was good in two studies [42, 43] and fair in one study [48].

Among these three studies, two studies reported that sleep bruxism was independently associated with higher SES, including higher education[42, 48]. However, the other study, conducted by Mota-Veloso et al. [43], found out that SES had a significant indirect effect on bruxism via sucking habits (finger sucking, nails or other objects bite) and that lower SES was associated with more sleep bruxism [43].

3.3 Prevalence of sleep disturbances in Latin America

Based on our selection criteria, eighteen studies [31–40, 42–49] were eligible. Where results in the same article were reported for different sleep disturbances types separately, they were entered into the analysis as separate studies. Therefore, a total of 18 papers including 28 studies were included in the final meta-analysis which is shown in Fig 2.A.

The overall pooled prevalence for sleep disturbance in Latin America was 27.32 % (95 % CI 21.71–33.75, I2 = 100 %) (Fig 2.A). To decide whether to include all of the articles examining sleep disturbances or not, a publication bias chart was created. The results showed that publication bias was not significant (p = 0.059) (Fig 3).

We divided eighteen papers into seven categories according to different types of sleep disturbances. Subgroup analysis was manipulated based on seven categories (Fig 4). The highest prevalence was for insomnia, with 39.52 % (95 % CI 31.79–47.82; p < 0.01), and the lowest prevalence was for EDS, with 15.52 % (95 % CI 11.85–20.07; p < 0.01). The overall pooled prevalence for sleep disturbance was 37.22 % (95 % CI 27.73–47.82; p = 0) across eight articles [33, 34, 36, 38, 44, 45, 47, 49], for OSA/SDB was 31.32 % (95 % CI 28.77–34.00; p = 0.11) across two articles [35, 40] and for bruxism was 16.60 % (95 % CI 8.83–29.04; p < 0.01) across three articles [42, 43, 48]. The overall pooled prevalence for short sleep duration was 23.09 % (95 % CI 8.98– 47.75; p =0) across four articles [37–39, 46], and for long sleep duration was 21.67 % (95 % CI 15.95–28.75; p < 0.01) across three articles [37, 39, 46].

3.4 Sleep length in Latin America

A total of two articles [41, 50] reported the sleep length (fig 2.B). Where results were reported for men and women separately, they were entered into the analysis as separate studies. In the pooled analysis, sleep length was significantly higher in men with sleep disturbances than in women with sleep disturbances with a standardized mean of 0.40 hours (95% CI: 0.34-0.47; p = 0.11; I2 = 100%).

Fig 2:
Fig 2:

Forest plot showing the primary outcomes in 31 cross sectional studies from 20 published reports in Latin America: (A) Prevalence of sleep disturbances; (B) Sleep length (hours)

Fig 3:
Fig 3:

Funnel plot for meta-analysis of the prevalence of sleep disturbances in Latin America. Egger’s test: p=0.0598

Fig 4:
Fig 4:

Subgroup analysis on the prevalence of sleep disturbances in Latin America by type of sleep disturbance. The black dot point s the estimate horizontal line is the 95% CI for prevalence plotted for each study. The black diamond at the bottom of each type of sleep disturbance is the e average prevalence. CI: confidence interval

3.5 Subgroup analysis

Because of a high level of heterogeneity across the included studies, a subgroup analysis was performed by region (cities), age group and quality of study in relation to principal outcome variable. The analysis revealed that the prevalence of sleep disturbances was highest in Brazil 28.52 (95 % CI 22.38-35.57) than Peru 15.91 (95 % CI 6.17-35.27). Also, the pooled prevalence of sleep disturbances among infant 56.52 (95 % CI 54.11-58.89) was greater than adolescents 27.11 (95 % CI 16.55-41.09) and adults 24.24 (95 % CI 18.93-30.48) (Table 3).

View this table:
Table 3:

Subgroup analyses for the prevalence of sleep disturbances in Latin America

3.6 Risk factors

Meta-analysis was possible for sleep disturbances prevalence with three SES factors (Education, income and employment status).

3.6.1 Education and Sleep disturbances

Eight studies [31, 33, 36, 37, 39, 45, 48, 49] evaluated the association between education and prevalence of sleep disturbances as shown in Fig 5.A. There is no association between low education and prevalent sleep disturbances, with a pooled OR of 1.42 (95%CI [0.87-2.29]; p=<0.01). However, the meta-analysis showed that the high educated population had a lower prevalence of sleep disturbances (OR 0.83; 95%CI [0.69-0.99]; p=<0.01), with a high heterogeneity between studies (I2= 79%).

Fig 5:
Fig 5:

(A) Forest plot for education and sleep disturbances prevalence (compared to the reference group). (B) Forest plot for income nd sleep distu prevalence (compared to the reference group). (C) Forest plot for employment status and sleep disturbances prevalence (compared to the reference g Box sizes reflect the weights of studies included in the meta-analysis, horizontal lines are the 95% CIs, and the summary OR are represented diamond. OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence

Separating the education analyses by quality of studies did not reveal a significant subgroup effect for sleep disturbances prevalence (p=0.70; Fig 6.A). Similarly, separating education analyses by cities did not reveal a significant subgroup effect for sleep disturbances prevalence (p=0.70; Fig 6.B).

Fig 6:
Fig 6:

Subgroup analyses to explore sources of heterogeneity in risk factors of sleep disturbances. (A) Forest plot demonstrating that higher ed was associated with sleep disturbances prevalence by quality of the study (good vs fair/poor). (B) Forest plot demonstrating that higher educati associated with sleep disturbances prevalence by City (Brazil vs multicentric)

3.6.2 Income and Sleep disturbances

Six studies [32, 33, 35, 38, 39, 46] considered income as a risk factor of sleep disturbances in Latin America. The meta-analysis showed a significant relationship between low income and the prevalence of sleep disturbances (OR 1.26; 95%CI [1.12-1.42]; p=0.09), with moderate heterogeneity between studies (I2= 59%).

However, it did not show a significant association between middle income (OR 1.07; 95%CI [0.78-1.46]; p=<0.01) or high income (OR 0.76; 95%CI [0.34- 1.32]; p=<0.01) and prevalence of sleep disturbances (Fig 5.B).

3.6.3 Work and Sleep disturbances

Data on the relationship between work and sleep disturbances are shown in Fig 5.C. The meta-analysis showed a significant relationship between no working and the prevalence of sleep disturbances (OR 2.84; 95%CI [2.14-3.76]; p=0.09) with no heterogeneity between studies (I2= 0%). Similarly, in the pooled analysis, being housewife was associated with high prevalence of sleep disturbances (OR 1.72; 95%CI [1.19-2.48]; p=0.13), with m heterogeneity between studies (I2= 55%).

4 DISCUSSION

4.1 Detailed summary of findings

The most used determinants were income (monthly personal income, monthly family income, per capita income, annual household income), wealt number of residents in the household, employment status/occupation, accessed healthcare system and composite indices. The sleep outcomes analyz excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), sleep duration, sleep quality/sleep disturbance, insomnia, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA)/sleep-disordered b (SDB) symptoms and bruxism. Higher SES was associated with lower sleep duration. Lower SES was associated with a decrease in sleep quality. EDS was significantly more prevalent in individuals with lower family income and less education. Sleep bruxism was associated with higher education and lower SES was associated with more sleep bruxism. For the 20 articles included, 12 were rated as fair or poor in study quality. Therefore, a meta-analysis was performed to estimate the prevalence of sleep disturbances in Latin America and the main SES risk factors that could be associated with it. The pooled prevalence using a meta-analysis of the random effects model was 27.32 % (95 % CI 21.71–33.75), with high heterogeneity (I2 = 100 %). The meta-analysis showed that the prevalence of sleep disturbances decreased with high education (OR 0.83; 95%CI [0.75-0.91]; I2= 79%), while it increased with low income (OR 1.26; 95%CI [1.12-1.42]; I2= 59%), unemployment (OR 2.84; 95%CI [2.14-3.76]; I2= 0%) and being housewife (OR 1.72; 95%CI [1.19-2.48]; I2=55.4%).

4.2 Relationship with public health literature

Epidemiologic data continues to increase the literature about the influence of sleep on general population’s health status. Sleep plays a vital role in several body functions as well as health disparities. Nowadays, scientific community is still investigating external and environmental factors affecting sleep mechanisms, but there are still a lot unknown. Based on current findings, it can be hypothesized that sleep disturbances are associated with socioeconomic status regardless type of people, liked suggested many other studies [17, 51–58]. The fact is, gradient of health disparity existing for some diseases like cardiovascular illness, seems the same for sleep. Regardless of world region where investigation is made, sleep disparities are observed because our findings on Latin America supports previous results [17, 51–58]. Our findings are coherent with previous studies elsewhere than Latin America and they are additional arguments in favor of the establishment of a more efficient worldwide program framing sleep health management.

4.3 The necessity of a multidimensional sleep management

Sleep disturbances management should be address in a multidimensional approach. Majority of studies use to focus on biological and psychological factors influencing sleep while it was only recently that SES was recognized as major determinant of sleep. Recent epidemiological studies performed outside Latin America in different public health contexts, associated sleep with stress [4], work conditions [8], environment [59], employment [17, 60, 61] and revealed latent interactions existing between government policy and public health strategies [22, 55, 62–64]. Obviously, a government’s economic policy influences funding of public health programs. Similarly, SES influences directly health status regardless disease assessed through individual’s living conditions and their resulting behavioral risk factors and stress. Knowing that sleep disparities can be measured objectively and quantitatively [6, 7, 50], our suggestion for governments is to invest as soon as possible in preventive management programs of sleep disturbances; before they become uncontrollable. It was already documented how expensive for economy were absenteeism and presenteeism due to sleep disturbances [65, 66], but diverse governments didn’t move forward yet with strong regulations to reduce these important losses [67, 68].

In this meta-analysis, there is an inequal distribution of research because 80% of studies came from Brazil (Table 1). Even if Brazil is representative of Latin American populations, its public health’s context regarding sleep management is not necessarily identical for its neighbors. More research should be performed in other Latin American countries to obtain an accurate overview of sleep disparities in this continent. Our suggestion for scientists, is to not forget that cross-sectionals studies are often used to understand determinants of health and establish preliminary evidence [69]; but are useless when it is necessary to consider correlation between theoretical determinant and health outcome. This first meta-analysis on sleep determinants in Latin America, enlight the high quality of cross-sectional studies published but also the lack of systematic review and longitudinal studies. To support public health strategies, randomized controlled trial and longitudinal studies are required [69].

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Socioeconomic Model of Sleep Health (adapted with permission from Etindele Sosso FA et al. Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ 202

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Socioeconomic Model of Sleep (adapted with permission from Etindele Sosso FA et al. Sleep Health 2021)

Data Availability

All data used for this review are available publicly and already published.

REFERENCES

  1. [1].↵
    Hale L, Troxel W, Buysse DJ. Sleep Health: An Opportunity for Public Health to Address Health Equity. Annu Rev Public Health 2020; 41: 81–99.
    OpenUrl
  2. [2].↵
    Grandner MA. Sleep, Health, and Society. Sleep Med Clin 2020; 15: 319–340.
    OpenUrl
  3. [3].↵
    Carroll JE, Irwin MR, Merkin SS, et al. Sleep and Multisystem Biological Risk: A Population-Based Study. PLOS ONE 2015; 10: e0118467.
  4. [4].↵
    Lo Martire V, Caruso D, Palagini L, et al. Stress & sleep: A relationship lasting a lifetime. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2020; 117: 65–77.
    OpenUrl
  5. [5].↵
    Vermeiren AP, Willeboordse M, Oosterhoff M, et al. Socioeconomic multi-domain health inequalities in Dutch primary school children. Eur J Public Health 2018; 28: 610–616.
    OpenUrl
  6. [6].↵
    Etindele Sosso FA. Measuring Sleep Health Disparities with Polysomnography: A Systematic Review of Preliminary Findings. Clocks Sleep 2022; 4: 80–87.
    OpenUrl
  7. [7].↵
    Etindele Sosso FA, Holmes SD, Weinstein AA. Influence of socioeconomic status on objective sleep measurement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of actigraphy studies. Sleep Health 2021; 7: 417–428.
    OpenUrl
  8. [8].↵
    Etindele-Sosso FA. Insomnia, excessive daytime sleepiness, anxiety, depression and socioeconomic status among customer service employees in Canada. Sleep Sci 2020; 13: 54–64.
    OpenUrl
  9. [9].
    Berwick DM. The Moral Determinants of Health. JAMA 2020; 324: 225–226.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. [10].↵
    Rodriguez JM, Karlamangla AS, Gruenewald TL, et al. Social stratification and allostatic load: shapes of health differences in the MIDUS study in the United States. J Biosoc Sci 2019; 51: 627–644.
    OpenUrl
  11. [11].↵
    Etindele Sosso FA, Kreidlmayer M, Pearson D, et al. Towards A Socioeconomic Model of Sleep Health among the Canadian Population: A Systematic Review of the Relationship between Age, Income, Employment, Education, Social Class, Socioeconomic Status and Sleep Disparities. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ 2022; 12: 1143–1167.
    OpenUrl
  12. [12].↵
    Grandner MA. Social-ecological model of sleep health. In: Sleep and Health. Elsevier, pp. 45–53.
  13. [13].↵
    van de Straat V, Cheval B, Schmidt RE, et al. Early predictors of impaired sleep: a study on life course socioeconomic conditions and sleeping disturbances in older adults. Aging Ment Health 2020; 24: 322–332.
    OpenUrl
  14. [14].
    Papadopoulos D, Sosso FE, Khoury T, et al. Sleep Disturbances Are Mediators Between Socioeconomic Status and Health: a Scoping Review. Int J Ment Health Addict 2022; 20: 480–504.
    OpenUrl
  15. [15].
    Mayne SL, Mitchell JA, Virudachalam S, et al. 0397 Neighborhood Physical and Social Environments and Sleep Among Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. Sleep 2020; 43: A152.
    OpenUrl
  16. [16].
    Petrovic D, Haba-Rubio J, Carmeli C, et al. Social inequalities in sleep-disordered breathing: Evidence from the CoLaus|HypnoLaus study. J Sleep Res 2019; 28: e12799.
  17. [17].↵
    Mai QD, Hill TD, Vila-Henninger L, et al. Employment insecurity and sleep disturbance: Evidence from 31 European countries. J Sleep Res 2019; 28: e12763.
  18. [18].↵
    Papadopoulos D, Etindele Sosso FA. Socioeconomic status and sleep health: a narrative synthesis of three decades of empirical research. J Clin Sleep Med JCSM Off Publ Am Acad Sleep Med. Epub ahead of print 1 December 2022. DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.10336.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. [19].↵
    Wu W, Jiang Y, Wang N, et al. Sleep quality of Shanghai residents: population-based cross-sectional study. Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehabil 2020; 29: 1055–1064.
    OpenUrl
  20. [20].↵
    Visvalingam N, Sathish T, Soljak M, et al. Prevalence of and factors associated with poor sleep quality and short sleep in a working population in Singapore. Sleep Health 2020; 6: 277–287.
    OpenUrl
  21. [21].↵
    Metse AP, Bowman JA. Prevalence of self-reported suboptimal sleep in Australia and receipt of sleep care: results from the 2017 National Social Survey. Sleep Health J Natl Sleep Found 2020; 6: 100–109.
    OpenUrl
  22. [22].↵
    Muller D, Paine S-J, Wu LJ, et al. How long do preschoolers in Aotearoa/New Zealand sleep? Associations with ethnicity and socioeconomic position. Sleep Health 2019; 5: 452–458.
    OpenUrl
  23. [23].↵
    Grandner MA. Chapter 5 - Social-ecological model of sleep health. In: Grandner MA (ed) Sleep and Health. Academic Press, pp. 45–53.
  24. [24].
    Ribeiro AI, Amaro J, Lisi C, et al. Neighborhood Socioeconomic Deprivation and Allostatic Load: A Scoping Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018; 15: 1092.
  25. [25].↵
    Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372: n71.
  26. [26].↵
    National Institute of Health. Study quality assessment tool National Institutes of Health: Bethesda, MD, USA.
  27. [27].↵
    Barendregt JJ, Doi SA, Lee YY, et al. Meta-analysis of prevalence. J Epidemiol Community Health 2013; 67: 974–978.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. [28].↵
    Borenstein M, Higgins JPT, Hedges LV, et al. Basics of meta-analysis: I2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity. Res Synth Methods 2017; 8: 5–18.
    OpenUrl
  29. [29].↵
    Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ. A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc 2009; 172: 137–159.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. [30].↵
    Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997; 315: 629–634.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. [31].↵
    Rocha FL, Guerra HL, Lima-Costa MFF. Prevalence of insomnia and associated socio-demographic factors in a Brazilian community: the Bambuí study. Sleep Med 2002; 3: 121–126.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. [32].↵
    Hara C, Lopes Rocha F, Lima-Costa MFF. Prevalence of excessive daytime sleepiness and associated factors in a Brazilian community: the Bambuí study. Sleep Med 2004; 5: 31–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. [33].↵
    Blay SL, Andreoli SB, Gastal FL. Prevalence of self-reported sleep disturbance among older adults and the association of disturbed sleep with service demand and medical conditions. Int Psychogeriatr 2008; 20: 582–595.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. [34].↵
    Fritsch Montero R, Lahsen Martínez P, Romeo Gómez R, et al. Sleep disorders in the adult population of Santiago of Chile and its association with common psychiatric disorders. Actas Esp Psiquiatr 2010; 38: 358–364.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. [35].↵
    Tufik S, Santos-Silva R, Taddei JA, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in the Sao Paulo Epidemiologic Sleep Study. Sleep Med 2010; 11: 441–446.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. [36].↵
    Blümel JE, Cano A, Mezones-Holguín E, et al. A multinational study of sleep disorders during female mid-life. Maturitas 2012; 72: 359–366.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. [37].↵
    Lima MG, Bergamo Francisco PMS, de Azevedo Barros MB. Sleep duration pattern and chronic diseases in Brazilian adults (ISACAMP, 2008/09). Sleep Med 2012; 13: 139–144.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. [38].↵
    Hoefelmann LP, Lopes A da S, da Silva KS, et al. Sociodemographic factors associated with sleep quality and sleep duration in adolescents from Santa Catarina, Brazil: what changed between 2001 and 2011? Sleep Med 2013; 14: 1017–1023.
    OpenUrl
  39. [39].↵
    Carrillo-Larco RM, Bernabé-Ortiz A, Miranda JJ, et al. Peruvians’ sleep duration: analysis of a population-based survey on adolescents and adults. PeerJ 2014; 2: e345.
  40. [40].↵
    Schwartz NG, Rattner A, Schwartz AR, et al. Sleep Disordered Breathing in Four Resource-Limited Settings in Peru: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Association with Chronic Diseases. Sleep 2015; 38: 1451–1459.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  41. [41].↵
    Schäfer AA, Domingues MR, Dahly DL, et al. Correlates of self-reported weekday sleep duration in adolescents: the 18-year follow-up of the 1993 Pelotas (Brazil) Birth Cohort Study. Sleep Med 2016; 23: 81–88.
    OpenUrl
  42. [42].↵
    Fulgencio LB, Corrêa-Faria P, Lage CF, et al. Diagnosis of sleep bruxism can assist in the detection of cases of verbal school bullying and measure the life satisfaction of adolescents. Int J Paediatr Dent 2017; 27: 293–301.
    OpenUrl
  43. [43].↵
    Mota-Veloso I, Celeste RK, Fonseca CP, et al. Effects of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder signs and socio-economic status on sleep bruxism and tooth wear among schoolchildren: structural equation modelling approach. Int J Paediatr Dent 2017; 27: 523–531.
    OpenUrl
  44. [44].↵
    Netsi E, Santos IS, Stein A, et al. A different rhythm of life: sleep patterns in the first 4 years of life and associated sociodemographic characteristics in a large Brazilian birth cohort. Sleep Med 2017; 37: 77–87.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  45. [45].↵
    de Lima TR, Silva DAS. Association of sleep quality with sociodemographic factors and lifestyle in adolescents from southern Brazil. World J Pediatr WJP 2018; 14: 383–391.
    OpenUrl
  46. [46].↵
    Lima MG, Barros MB de A, Ceolim MF, et al. Sleep duration, health status, and subjective well-being: a population-based study. Rev Saude Publica 2018; 52: 82.
  47. [47].↵
    Barros MB de A, Lima MG, Ceolim MF, et al. Quality of sleep, health and well-being in a population-based study. Rev Saúde Pública; 53: 82.
  48. [48].↵
    Pontes L da S, Prietsch SOM. Sleep bruxism: population based study in people with 18 years or more in the city of Rio Grande, Brazil. Rev Bras Epidemiol Braz J Epidemiol 2019; 22: e190038.
  49. [49].↵
    Wendt A, Costa CS, Machado AKF, et al. Sleep disturbances and daytime fatigue: data from the Brazilian National Health Survey, 2013. Cad Saúde Pública; 35. Epub ahead of print 11 March 2019. DOI: 10.1590/0102-311X00086918.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. [50].↵
    Wendt A, da Silva ICM, Gonçalves H, et al. Sleep parameters measured by accelerometry: descriptive analyses from the 22-year follow-up of the Pelotas 1993 birth cohort. Sleep Med 2020; 67: 83–90.
    OpenUrl
  51. [51].↵
    Holstein BE, Ammitzbøll J, Damsgaard MT, et al. Difficulties falling asleep among adolescents: Social inequality and time trends 1991-2018. J Sleep Res 2020; 29: e12941.
  52. [52].
    Williamson AA, Mindell JA, Hiscock H, et al. Sleep Problem Trajectories and Cumulative Socio-Ecological Risks: Birth to School-Age. J Pediatr 2019; 215: 229–237.e4.
    OpenUrl
  53. [53].
    Sarveswaran G, Arikrishnan K, Krishnamoorthy Y, et al. Prevalence and determinants of poor quality of sleep among adolescents in rural Puducherry, South India. Int J Adolesc Med Health; 33. Epub ahead of print 17 April 2019. DOI: 10.1515/ijamh-2018-0101.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  54. [54].
    Ren Y, Liu Y, Meng T, et al. Social-biological influences on sleep duration among adult residents of Northeastern China. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2019; 17: 47.
  55. [55].↵
    Peltzer K, Pengpid S. Prevalence, social and health correlates of insomnia among persons 15 years and older in Indonesia. Psychol Health Med 2019; 24: 757–768.
    OpenUrl
  56. [56].
    Magee C, Gopaldasani V, Bakand S, et al. The Physical Work Environment and Sleep: A Latent Class Analysis. J Occup Environ Med 2019; 61: 1011–1018.
    OpenUrl
  57. [57].
    Doane LD, Breitenstein RS, Beekman C, et al. Early Life Socioeconomic Disparities in Children’s Sleep: The Mediating Role of the Current Home Environment. J Youth Adolesc 2019; 48: 56–70.
    OpenUrl
  58. [58].↵
    Chen J-H. Experience of Poverty and Problem Sleep in Later Life. Res Aging 2019; 41: 697–722.
    OpenUrl
  59. [59].↵
    Johnson DA, Billings ME, Hale L. Environmental Determinants of Insufficient Sleep and Sleep Disorders: Implications for Population Health. Curr Epidemiol Rep 2018; 5: 61–69.
    OpenUrl
  60. [60].↵
    Maeda M, Filomeno R, Kawata Y, et al. Association between unemployment and insomnia-related symptoms based on the Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions: a large cross-sectional Japanese population survey. Ind Health 2019; 57: 701–710.
    OpenUrl
  61. [61].↵
    Lee E-S, Park S. Patterns of Change in Employment Status and Their Association with Self-Rated Health, Perceived Daily Stress, and Sleep among Young Adults in South Korea. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019; 16: 4491.
  62. [62].↵
    Sheehan CM, Frochen SE, Walsemann KM, et al. Are U.S. adults reporting less sleep?: Findings from sleep duration trends in the National Health Interview Survey, 2004-2017. Sleep 2019; 42: zsy221.
  63. [63].
    Poulain T, Vogel M, Sobek C, et al. Associations Between Socio-Economic Status and Child Health: Findings of a Large German Cohort Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019; 16: 677.
  64. [64].↵
    Chami HA, Bechnak A, Isma’eel H, et al. Sleepless in Beirut: Sleep Difficulties in an Urban Environment With Chronic Psychosocial Stress. J Clin Sleep Med JCSM Off Publ Am Acad Sleep Med 2019; 15: 603–614.
    OpenUrl
  65. [65].↵
    Sadeghniiat-Haghighi K, Najafi A, Eftekhari S, et al. Insomnia and its association with absenteeism: A cross-sectional study among Iranian nursing team. Sleep Sci 2021; 14: 305–310.
    OpenUrl
  66. [66].↵
    Hwang J, Cho S-S, Kim JI. Association between insomnia and absenteeism or presenteeism among Korean employees. Ann Occup Environ Med 2022; 34: e41.
  67. [67].↵
    Huyett P, Bhattacharyya N. Incremental health care utilization and expenditures for sleep disorders in the United States. J Clin Sleep Med JCSM Off Publ Am Acad Sleep Med 2021; 17: 1981–1986.
    OpenUrl
  68. [68].↵
    Wickwire EM. Value-based sleep and breathing: health economic aspects of obstructive sleep apnea. Fac Rev 2021; 10: 40.
  69. [69].↵
    Wang X, Cheng Z. Cross-Sectional Studies: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Recommendations. Chest 2020; 158: S65–S71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Posted June 05, 2023.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email
Social, environmental and economic determinants of sleep disturbances in Latin America: A systematic review and a meta-analysis of public health literature
Filipa Torres Silva, Rita Queiroz Rodrigues, Margarida Carvalho, Sofia Zoukal, Gabriel Cordova Zarate, Faustin Armel Etindele Sosso
medRxiv 2023.06.02.23290915; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.02.23290915
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area