Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

LncRNA antigens- a novel resource to improve immunotherapy efficacy predictions in Melanoma

View ORCID ProfileSumaira Malik, Aaron Golden
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.30.23290735
Sumaira Malik
1School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Galway, Ireland,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sumaira Malik
  • For correspondence: s.malik3@nuigalway.ie s.malik3@nuigalway.ie
Aaron Golden
2School of Natural Sciences, University of Galway, Ireland,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: aaron.golden@universityofgalway.ie
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background ICI (immune checkpoint inhibitor) therapy is one of the most promising treatments for melanoma. ICI response however varies among patients, emphasizing the importance of identifying genomic biomarkers to predict likely therapeutic efficacy in advance of treatment. We hypothesised that a lncRNA based immunogencity (lnc-IM) score could be used to predict individual response to ICI treatment, and that this could complement the existing criterion for ICI selection based on tumor mutation burden (TMB).

Methodology The TCGA-SKCM (n=101) and the ICI treated UCLA (n=25), MSKCC (n=16) and DFCI (n=40) melanoma cohorts were used in this study, involving both clinical and transcriptomic data. Each patient was assigned an lnc-IM score based on the number of lncRNA sORF derived peptides predicted to be presented by their tumor’s MHC-I genotype. For the ICI treated cohorts, a combined antigen score was defined as a sum of neo-antigen load (derived from TMB) and lnc-IM score. A logistic regression-based classifier was used to predict ICI responses based on these combined antigen scores.

Results Survival analysis showed improved overall survival among patients with low lnc-IM scores (HR= 0.39, p=0.009) in the TCGA-SKCM cohort. We also observed a negative association between tumor immune cell concentration and lnc-IM scores, with low lnc-IM groups showing higher anti-tumor immune cell concentrations . Using the ICI treated cohorts, we demonstrated that a classifier based on combined antigen scoring improved the prediction of immunotherapy outcomes as compared to using TMB alone, yielding an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.71 with an accuracy of 0.54 and recall of 1. We also demonstrated a reduced rate of false negatives (14%) by using a combined antigen score as compared to the use of TMB alone (33%) in ICI treated cohorts.

Conclusion Our findings suggest that the use of combined antigen scores (using lnc-IM scores along with TMB derived neoantigen load) have potential in improving immunotherapy efficacy predictions. Prospective validation in larger cohort sizes is warranted.

What is already known on this topic Previous studies have established actionable associations between TMB neoantigen load and immunotherapy responses.

What this study adds This study introduces lnc-IM scores as a novel metric that predicts patients antigen load based on translatable lncRNAs expression. These lnc-IM scores when combined with TMB associated neoantigen load indicate an improvement in immunotherapy efficacy predictions.

How this study might affect research, practice or policy Future research is needed to further validate lnc-IM scores as a predictive biomarker for immunotherapy response in various cancer types. The use of lnc-IM scores can empower clinicians to make more informed decisions about administering immunotherapy treatments, improvingpatient outcomes.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This project was supported by a Hardiman Research Scholarship, University of Galway, Ireland

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

TCGA (https://portal. gdc.cancer.gov) cBioPortal (https://www.cbioportal.org/)

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov

https://www.cbioportal.org/

  • List of Abbreviations

    ICI
    Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy
    lnc-IM score
    LncRNA based immunogencity score
    TMB
    Tumor mutation burden
    AUC
    Area under the curve
    PDL1
    Programmed cell death ligand 1
    dMMR
    Mismatch repair defect
    MSI
    Microsatellites Instability
    ENCODE
    Encyclopedia of DNA Elements
    CTL
    Cytotoxic T lymphocyte
    sORFs
    Short open reading frames
    TIM
    Tumor immune microenvironment
    TCGA
    The Cancer Genome Atlas
    cpm
    Counts per million
    PHBR
    Patient Harmonic mean Best Ran
    TILs
    Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes
    ORR
    Overall response rates
    HR
    Hazard ratio
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted June 01, 2023.
    Download PDF

    Supplementary Material

    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    LncRNA antigens- a novel resource to improve immunotherapy efficacy predictions in Melanoma
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    LncRNA antigens- a novel resource to improve immunotherapy efficacy predictions in Melanoma
    Sumaira Malik, Aaron Golden
    medRxiv 2023.05.30.23290735; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.30.23290735
    Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    LncRNA antigens- a novel resource to improve immunotherapy efficacy predictions in Melanoma
    Sumaira Malik, Aaron Golden
    medRxiv 2023.05.30.23290735; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.30.23290735

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Oncology
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (269)
    • Allergy and Immunology (549)
    • Anesthesia (134)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (1747)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (238)
    • Dermatology (172)
    • Emergency Medicine (310)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (653)
    • Epidemiology (10780)
    • Forensic Medicine (8)
    • Gastroenterology (583)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2933)
    • Geriatric Medicine (286)
    • Health Economics (531)
    • Health Informatics (1918)
    • Health Policy (833)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (743)
    • Hematology (290)
    • HIV/AIDS (627)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12496)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (684)
    • Medical Education (299)
    • Medical Ethics (86)
    • Nephrology (321)
    • Neurology (2780)
    • Nursing (150)
    • Nutrition (431)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (553)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (597)
    • Oncology (1454)
    • Ophthalmology (440)
    • Orthopedics (172)
    • Otolaryngology (255)
    • Pain Medicine (190)
    • Palliative Medicine (56)
    • Pathology (379)
    • Pediatrics (864)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (362)
    • Primary Care Research (333)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2630)
    • Public and Global Health (5338)
    • Radiology and Imaging (1002)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (594)
    • Respiratory Medicine (722)
    • Rheumatology (329)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (288)
    • Sports Medicine (278)
    • Surgery (327)
    • Toxicology (47)
    • Transplantation (149)
    • Urology (125)