Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

A Deep Learning Approach to Accurately Discriminate Between Optic Disc Drusen and Papilledema on Fundus Photographs

Kanchalika Sathianvichitr, View ORCID ProfileRaymond P. Najjar, Tang Zhiqun, J. Alexander Fraser, Christine Wen Leng Yau, View ORCID ProfileMichael Julien Alexandre Girard, Fiona Costello, Mung Yan Lin, Wolf Alexander Lagrèze, Catherine Vignal-Clermont, Clare L. Fraser, Steffen Hamann, Nancy J. Newman, Valérie Biousse, View ORCID ProfileDan Milea, the BONSAI Group
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.24.23290447
Kanchalika Sathianvichitr
1Visual Neuroscience Research Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore
MD, FICO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raymond P. Najjar
1Visual Neuroscience Research Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore
2Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore
3Department of Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Raymond P. Najjar
Tang Zhiqun
1Visual Neuroscience Research Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Alexander Fraser
4Departments of Clinical Neurological Sciences and Ophthalmology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine Wen Leng Yau
5Neuro-Ophthalmology Department, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore
MBBS(S’pore), MMed(Ophth)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Julien Alexandre Girard
2Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore
6Ophthalmic Engineering & Innovation Laboratory, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore
7Institute for Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology, Basel, Switzerland
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michael Julien Alexandre Girard
Fiona Costello
8Departments of Clinical Neurosciences and Surgery, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mung Yan Lin
9Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
10Department of Ophthalmology, Emory Eye Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolf Alexander Lagrèze
11Eye Center, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Catherine Vignal-Clermont
12Hopital Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clare L. Fraser
13Save Sight Institute, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
MBBS, FRANZCO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steffen Hamann
14Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nancy J. Newman
10Department of Ophthalmology, Emory Eye Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
15Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
16Department of Neurological Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Valérie Biousse
10Department of Ophthalmology, Emory Eye Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
15Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dan Milea
1Visual Neuroscience Research Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore
2Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore
5Neuro-Ophthalmology Department, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore
14Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Dan Milea
  • For correspondence: dan.milea@singhealth.com.sg
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective To assess the performance of a deep learning system (DLS) to discriminate between optic disc drusen (ODD) and papilledema caused by intracranial hypertension, using standard color ocular fundus photographs collected in a large international multi-ethnic population.

Design Retrospective study.

Participants The study included 4,508 color fundus images in 2,180 patients from 30 neuro-ophthalmology centers (19 countries) participating in the Brain and Optic Nerve Study with Artificial Intelligence (BONSAI) Group.

Methods We trained, validated, and tested a dedicated DLS for binary classification of ODD vs. papilledema (including various subgroups within each category), on conventional mydriatic digital ocular fundus photographs. For training and internal validation, we used 857 ODD images and 3,230 papilledema images, in 1,959 patients. External-testing was subsequently performed on an independent dataset (221 patients) including 207 images with ODD (96 visible and 111 buried), provided by 3 centers of the Optic Disc Drusen Studies Consortium, and 214 images of papilledema (92 mild-to-moderate and 122 severe) from a previously validated study.

Main outcome measures Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were used to discriminate between ODD and papilledema.

Results Overall, the DLS could accurately distinguish between all ODD and papilledema (all severities included): AUC 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96 to 0.98), accuracy 90.5% (95% CI, 88.0% to 92.9%), sensitivity 86.0% (95% CI, 82.1% to 90.1%), and specificity 94.9% (95% CI, 92.3% to 97.6%). The performance of the DLS remained high for discrimination of buried ODD from mild-to-moderate papilledema: AUC 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90 to 0.96), accuracy 84.2% (95% CI, 80.2%-88.6%), sensitivity 78.4% (95% CI, 72.2% to 84.7%), and specificity 91.3% (95% CI, 87.0% to 96.4%).

Conclusions A dedicated DLS can accurately distinguish between ODD and papilledema caused by elevated intracranial pressure, even when considering buried ODD vs mild-to-moderate papilledema. Future studies are required to validate the utility of this DLS in clinical practice.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The study was supported by the Singapore National Medical Research Council (Clinician Scientist Individual Research grant CIRG18Nov-0013), the Duke-NUS Medical School, Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Academic Clinical Program grant (05/FY2019/P2/06-A60).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

SINGHEALTH CENTRALISED INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD(CIRB)of Singapore Eye Research Institute gave ethical approval for this work and waived informed consent based on ethical consideration (Aim 1 of the study, on retrospective cohort, where only de-identified data will be used for analysis).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Funding: Supported by the Singapore National Medical Research Council (Clinician Scientist Individual Research grant CIRG18Nov-0013), the Duke-NUS Medical School, Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Academic Clinical Program grant (05/FY2019/P2/06-A60).

  • Conflict of interest: no conflicts of interest related to this work.

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 29, 2023.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Deep Learning Approach to Accurately Discriminate Between Optic Disc Drusen and Papilledema on Fundus Photographs
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A Deep Learning Approach to Accurately Discriminate Between Optic Disc Drusen and Papilledema on Fundus Photographs
Kanchalika Sathianvichitr, Raymond P. Najjar, Tang Zhiqun, J. Alexander Fraser, Christine Wen Leng Yau, Michael Julien Alexandre Girard, Fiona Costello, Mung Yan Lin, Wolf Alexander Lagrèze, Catherine Vignal-Clermont, Clare L. Fraser, Steffen Hamann, Nancy J. Newman, Valérie Biousse, Dan Milea, the BONSAI Group
medRxiv 2023.05.24.23290447; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.24.23290447
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A Deep Learning Approach to Accurately Discriminate Between Optic Disc Drusen and Papilledema on Fundus Photographs
Kanchalika Sathianvichitr, Raymond P. Najjar, Tang Zhiqun, J. Alexander Fraser, Christine Wen Leng Yau, Michael Julien Alexandre Girard, Fiona Costello, Mung Yan Lin, Wolf Alexander Lagrèze, Catherine Vignal-Clermont, Clare L. Fraser, Steffen Hamann, Nancy J. Newman, Valérie Biousse, Dan Milea, the BONSAI Group
medRxiv 2023.05.24.23290447; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.24.23290447

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Ophthalmology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (269)
  • Allergy and Immunology (552)
  • Anesthesia (135)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1752)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (238)
  • Dermatology (173)
  • Emergency Medicine (312)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (658)
  • Epidemiology (10794)
  • Forensic Medicine (8)
  • Gastroenterology (586)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2943)
  • Geriatric Medicine (287)
  • Health Economics (532)
  • Health Informatics (1923)
  • Health Policy (836)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (745)
  • Hematology (291)
  • HIV/AIDS (630)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12511)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (688)
  • Medical Education (299)
  • Medical Ethics (86)
  • Nephrology (324)
  • Neurology (2793)
  • Nursing (151)
  • Nutrition (433)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (559)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (597)
  • Oncology (1462)
  • Ophthalmology (443)
  • Orthopedics (172)
  • Otolaryngology (255)
  • Pain Medicine (190)
  • Palliative Medicine (56)
  • Pathology (380)
  • Pediatrics (866)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (365)
  • Primary Care Research (336)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2638)
  • Public and Global Health (5357)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1010)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (595)
  • Respiratory Medicine (726)
  • Rheumatology (329)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (289)
  • Sports Medicine (278)
  • Surgery (327)
  • Toxicology (47)
  • Transplantation (150)
  • Urology (125)