Abstract
Objectives To classify older adults with MLTC into clusters based on accumulating conditions as trajectories over time, characterise clusters and quantify associations between derived clusters and all-cause mortality.
Design We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) over nine years (n=15,091 aged 50 years and older). Group-based trajectory modelling was used to classify people into MLTC clusters based on accumulating conditions over time. Derived clusters were used to quantify the associations between MLTC trajectory memberships, sociodemographic characteristics, and all-cause mortality.
Results Five distinct clusters of MLTC trajectories were identified and characterised as: “no-LTC” (18.57%), “single-LTC” (31.21%), “evolving MLTC” (25.82%), “moderate MLTC” (17.12%), and “high MLTC” (7.27%). Increasing age was consistently associated with an increased number of MLTC. Female sex (aOR = 1.13; 95%CI 1.01 to 1.27) and ethnic minority (aOR = 2.04; 95%CI 1.40 to 3.00) were associated with the “moderate MLTC” and “high MLTC” clusters, respectively. Higher education and paid employment were associated with a lower likelihood of progression over time towards an increased number of MLTC. All the clusters had higher all-cause mortality than the “no-LTC” cluster.
Conclusions The development of MLTC and the increase in the number of conditions over time follow distinct trajectories. These are determined by non-modifiable (age, sex, ethnicity) and modifiable factors (education and employment). Stratifying risk through clustering will enable practitioners to identify older adults with a higher likelihood of worsening MLTC over time to tailor effective interventions.
Strengths and limitations
The main strength of the current study is the use of a large dataset, assessing longitudinal data to examine MLTC trajectories and a dataset that is nationally representative of people aged 50 years and older, including a wide range of long-term conditions and sociodemographics.
The measurement of MLTC was limited to ten long-term conditions, which was all of what was available in the English of Longitudinal Study of Ageing, which may not be exhaustive of all possible long-term conditions.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This is independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (Artificial Intelligence for Multiple Long Term Conditions (AIM); (NIHR 202637). The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was granted by the University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine Research Committee, 67953.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding The English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) is funded by the National Institute on Aging/National Institutes of Health, USA (grant number 5R01AG017644-16) and by a consortium of the UK government departments coordinated by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC).
The Primary Care Research Centre at the University of Southampton is a member of the NIHR School for Primary Care Research and is supported by National Institute for Health and care Research (NIHR) Research funds. HDM is a National Institute for Health Research-funded Academic Clinical Lecturer and has received NIHR funding for this grant (NIHR202637). AF is supported by the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Consortium.
Disclaimer This report is independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (Artificial Intelligence for Multiple Long-Term Conditions (AIM), “The development and validation of population clusters for integrating health and social care: A mixed-methods study on Multiple Long-Term Conditions”, “NIHR202637”). The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Competing interests None declared.
Ethics approval Ethical approval for the study was provided by the Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee, University Hospital Southampton, (reference number 67953).
Data Availability
ELSA data were available through the UK Data Archive and are widely available to access in this way; as such our study data will not be made available for access.
