Abstract
Objectives Surgical resection is the method of choice for treating medically refractory unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), but postsurgical prognosis depends on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. Seizure freedom is more often achieved after resection in MRI-positive patients (those with MRI abnormalities such as mesial temporal sclerosis) than in MRI-negative patients. Diffusion MRI shows promise as a marker of neuronal abnormalities due to its sensitivity to cellular changes such as axon damage, indexed by fractional anisotropy. However, fractional anisotropy is not specific to axon integrity in grey matter where axon orientation is not uniform. In contrast, microscopic fractional anisotropy is a recently introduced dMRI technique that is sensitive to axon integrity regardless of axon orientation. This work investigated whether microscopic fractional anisotropy may be sensitive to hippocampal abnormalities in unilateral TLE.
Methods Diffusion MRI was performed on a 3T scanner in 9 patients (age = 33 +/- 12 years) with unilateral TLE and 9 healthy volunteers (age = 26 +/- 6). A deep learning method was employed to segment the hippocampus into smaller subfields corresponding to the subiculum, cornu ammonis (CA) 1, CA2/3, and CA4 plus dentate gyrus (DG). Mean ipsilateral and contralateral measurements of subregion volume, diffusivity, fractional anisotropy, and microscopic fractional anisotropy were compared to investigate asymmetry in each subfield.
Results Microscopic fractional anisotropy was reduced, and diffusivity was elevated in the ipsilateral CA4/DG region relative to the contralateral side in all 9 patients. Asymmetries in diffusion metrics between the left and right sides of the hippocampus subfields were not observed in the healthy volunteers.
Significance Diffusion MRI may complement standard imaging procedures by detecting abnormalities in MRI-negative patients. Due to its insensitivity to axon orientation, microscopic fractional anisotropy may yield a more robust measurement than fractional anisotropy and may improve epileptic focus localization in surgical candidates.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Canada Research Chairs Program (authors CB, AK), Canada First Research Excellence Fund to BrainsCAN, a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Discovery grant (IJ), a Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) project grant (AK), a CIHR operating grant (IJ), and the NSERC Canada Graduate Scholarship Doctoral (CGS-D) program (NA).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the health sciences research ethics board at Western University.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Disclosure of conflicts of interest: None of the authors has any conflict of interest to disclose.
Data Availability
Data are not available due to reasons of sensitivity.
