Abstract
Lipohyperplasia dolorosa (LiDo), also known as lipedema, is a painful subcutaneous adipose tissue disorder. While the characteristic bilateral accumulation of adipocytes in extremities sparing hands and feet is investigated, an objective characterization of pain and the sensory system of LiDo patients is missing. Accordingly, progress to overcome the unsatisfying response to pain-therapeutics of patients of this widespread, lifelong, and severe disease is missing.
We characterized the sensory detection profile of painful and non-painful stimuli in 20 non-obese LiDo patients and 20 waist-to-height-ratio matched controls using the clinically approved QST-protocol of the German Research Association on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS e.V.). Further, pain-reports and participants’-psychometry was assessed using the German Pain Questionnaire.
LiDo patients showed no overt psychometric abnormalities. LiDo pain appeared as somatic rather than neuropathic or psychosomatic aversive. All QST measurements were normal with the selective exception of two: The pressure pain threshold (PPT) was strongly reduced and the vibration detection threshold (VDT) was strongly increased selectively at the affected thigh. In contrast, sensory profiles at the dorsum of the hand were normal. ROC-analysis of the combination of PPT and VDT of thigh versus hand shows high sensitivity and specificity, categorizing correctly 96.5% of the measured participants as LiDo patients or healthy controls, respectively.
Thus, we propose to assess both, PPT and VDT, at the painful thigh and the pain-free hand as basis to develop a combined PVTH-score for differential diagnosis as a fast and convenient bedside test for the identification of non-obese LiDo patients.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The Project was funded by the DFG
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee of University Hospital Cologne gave ethical approval for this work. Ethics committee of the Aerztekammer Nordrhein gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
