Abstract
Background Conducting rapid health assessments during large-scale disasters can present significant challenges. While responding to key humanitarian needs is a priority, assessing and understanding gaps and areas for strengthening are vital in ensuring a comprehensive and equitable response.
Aim To utilise the perspectives of healthcare workers responding to the Turkiye earthquake 2023, as a means of assessing humanitarian health response gaps.
Design and setting Observational, descriptive, prospective study design in Turkiye.
Method Online survey tool using a Likert-type scale, aligned with minimum standards of humanitarian health response themes, in both English and Turkish distributed by healthcare organisations and academic networks to a convenience sample of health workers responding to the earthquake.
Results 45 respondents with perspectives demonstrating general limitations across all humanitarian health themes, with particular gaps in:
Coordination and response timeliness
Reporting and surveillance
Mental health, palliative care and sexual and reproductive health
Conclusion Using a survey tool to assess health worker perspective is feasible and provides rapid insights into humanitarian response efforts. Such data can be added to other assessment information to build a more comprehensive picture of needs while engaging with a key stakeholder group, and can support service providers to address gaps and strengthen response actions.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
As this was considered a service development study, formal ethics review was deemed not required following the decision support tool on the NHS Health Research Authority. https://www.hra-decisiontools.org.uk/ethics/
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data produced in this study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
