ABSTRACT
Artificial intelligence (AI) holds great promise in healthcare and medicine on being able to help with many aspects, from biological scientific discovery, to clinical patient care, to public health policy making. However, the potential risk of AI methods for generating factually incorrect or unfaithful information is a big concern, which could result in serious consequences. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the faithfulness problem in existing research on AI in healthcare and medicine, including analysis of the cause of unfaithful results, evaluation metrics, and mitigation methods. We will systematically review the recent progress in optimizing the factuality in various generative medical AI methods, including knowledge grounded large language models, text-to-text generation tasks such as medical text summarization, medical text simplification, multimodality-to-text generation tasks such as radiology report generation, and automatic medical fact-checking. The challenges and limitations of ensuring the faithfulness of AI-generated information in these applications, as well as forthcoming opportunities will be discussed. We expect this review to help researchers and practitioners understand the faithfulness problem in AI-generated information in healthcare and medicine, as well as the recent progress and challenges on related research. Our review can also serve as a guide for researchers and practitioners who are interested in applying AI in medicine and healthcare.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The study was partially supported by NSF 1750326
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
