Improving online health search via multi-dimensional information quality models based on deep learning

Boya Zhang; Nona Naderi; Rahul Mishra; Douglas Teodoro

doi:10.1101/2023.04.11.22281038

Abstract

Background The presence of widespread misinformation in Web resources and the limited quality control provided by search engines can lead to serious implications for individuals seeking health advice.

Objective We aimed to investigate a multi-dimensional information quality assessment model based on deep learning to enhance the reliability of online healthcare information search results.

Methods In this retrospective study, we simulated online health information search scenarios with a topic set of 35 different health-related inquiries and a corpus containing one billion Web documents from the April 2019 snapshot of Common Crawl. Using state-of-the-art pre-trained language models, we inferred the usefulness, supportiveness, and credibility quality dimensions of the retrieved documents for a given search query.

Results The usefulness model provided the largest distinction between help and harm compatibility documents with a difference of 0.053. The supportiveness model achieved the best harm compatibility (0.024), while the combination of usefulness, supportiveness, and credibility models achieved the best help and harm compatibility on helpful topics.

Conclusions Our results suggest that integrating automatic ranking models created for specific information quality dimensions can increase the effectiveness of health-related information retrieval for decision-making.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by the University of Geneva.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

Email(s): boya.zhang{at}unige.ch (B. Zhang); nona.naderi{at}hesge.ch (N. Naderi); rahul.mishra{at}unige.ch (R. Mishra); douglas.teodoro{at}unige.ch (D. Teodoro)