Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Understanding dynamics of respiration amongst sexes: who breathe more efficiently?

View ORCID ProfileDev Himanshubhai Desai, Prahasth Dave, Anita Verma, Neeraj Mahajan
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.28.23287803
Dev Himanshubhai Desai
1Smt. NHLMMC, Ahmedabad
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Dev Himanshubhai Desai
  • For correspondence: devhdesai01@gmail.com
Prahasth Dave
1Smt. NHLMMC, Ahmedabad
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anita Verma
2Department of Physiology, Smt. NHLMMC, Ahmedabad
Roles: Professor and Head
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neeraj Mahajan
2Department of Physiology, Smt. NHLMMC, Ahmedabad
Roles: Associate Professor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction Respiration is a complex phenomenon requiring diaphragm, inter-costal muscles and other supporting structures. Contemplating the anatomical & physiological differences between males and females, it is essential to know how the respiratory system works in both of them. No such other study has been conducted in an Indian setup, which guided us to take up this topic.

Methodology Total of N= 216 (Males 63, Females- 153) student were enrolled. All the participants were between the age of 17-19. Their data of Tidal volume, inspiratory reserve volume, expiratory reserve volume, maximum expiratory pressure and their vital capacity both sitting and standing were gathered and analysee.

Results Tidal volume was in males 553±56 ml and 666±60 in females(p-value = 0.031). IRV was in males 2103±139 ml and 1717±99 in females(p-value>0.0001). ERV was in males 1638±113 ml and 1323±65 in females (p-value>0.0001). VC Standing was in males 3947±155 ml and 3278±105 in females(p-value>0.0001). VC sitting was in males 3492±151 ml and 2743±107 in females(pvalue>0.0001). MEP was in males 90±8 mmHg and 64±6 mmHg in females(p-value>0.0001).

Range of Pearson correlation coefficient for all=(+0.2)-(−0.2).

Conclusion Tidal volume was found to be higher in females than in males. Vital capacity was higher in males than in females by 700 ml in both position and vital capacity was higher by 500ml in standing than in sitting in both males and females. Body mass index weakly correlatable positively or negatively with all parameters. MEP was found to be higher in males but was weakly correlated negatively with BMI.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

IRB of SMT. NHLMMC (Shrimati Nathiba Hargovindas Lakhamichand Municipal Medical College) gave Ethical approval for this work

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Email:- Prahasth{at}gmail.com

  • Email:- anitavermadr{at}gmail.com

  • Email:- neeraj.mahajan{at}gmail.com

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 29, 2023.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Understanding dynamics of respiration amongst sexes: who breathe more efficiently?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Understanding dynamics of respiration amongst sexes: who breathe more efficiently?
Dev Himanshubhai Desai, Prahasth Dave, Anita Verma, Neeraj Mahajan
medRxiv 2023.03.28.23287803; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.28.23287803
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Understanding dynamics of respiration amongst sexes: who breathe more efficiently?
Dev Himanshubhai Desai, Prahasth Dave, Anita Verma, Neeraj Mahajan
medRxiv 2023.03.28.23287803; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.28.23287803

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Respiratory Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (243)
  • Allergy and Immunology (524)
  • Anesthesia (125)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1430)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (219)
  • Dermatology (158)
  • Emergency Medicine (292)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (588)
  • Epidemiology (10321)
  • Forensic Medicine (6)
  • Gastroenterology (532)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2649)
  • Geriatric Medicine (255)
  • Health Economics (499)
  • Health Informatics (1744)
  • Health Policy (791)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (679)
  • Hematology (269)
  • HIV/AIDS (569)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12111)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (649)
  • Medical Education (274)
  • Medical Ethics (83)
  • Nephrology (291)
  • Neurology (2476)
  • Nursing (145)
  • Nutrition (380)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (496)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (569)
  • Oncology (1330)
  • Ophthalmology (403)
  • Orthopedics (151)
  • Otolaryngology (238)
  • Pain Medicine (172)
  • Palliative Medicine (51)
  • Pathology (343)
  • Pediatrics (784)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (334)
  • Primary Care Research (296)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2415)
  • Public and Global Health (5025)
  • Radiology and Imaging (898)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (532)
  • Respiratory Medicine (686)
  • Rheumatology (309)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (257)
  • Sports Medicine (246)
  • Surgery (299)
  • Toxicology (45)
  • Transplantation (141)
  • Urology (108)