ABSTRACT
Importance Poor oral health is a modifiable risk factor that is associated with a variety of health outcomes. However, the relationship between oral and brain health is not well understood.
Objective To test the hypothesis that poor oral health is associated with worse neuroimaging brain health profiles in persons without stroke or dementia.
Design We conducted a 2-stage cross-sectional neuroimaging study using data from the UK Biobank (UKB). First, we tested for association between self-reported poor oral health and MRI neuroimaging markers of brain health. Second, we used Mendelian Randomization (MR) analyses to test for association between genetically-determined poor oral health and the same neuroimaging markers.
Setting Ongoing population study in the United Kingdom. The UKB enrolled participants between 2006 and 2010. Data analysis was performed from September 1, 2022, to January 10, 2023.
Participants 40,175 persons aged 40 to 70 enrolled between 2006 to 2010 who underwent a dedicated research brain MRI between 2012 and 2013.
Exposures During MRI assessment, poor oral health was defined as the presence of dentures or loose teeth. As instruments for the MR analysis, we used 116 independent DNA sequence variants known to significantly increase the composite risk of decayed, missing, or filled teeth and dentures.
Main Outcomes and Measures As neuroimaging markers of brain health, we assessed the volume of white matter hyperintensities (WMH), as well as aggregate measures of fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD), two metrics indicative of white matter tract disintegrity obtained through diffusion tensor imaging. These measurements were evaluated across 48 distinct brain regions, with FA and MD values for each region also considered as individual outcomes for the MR method.
Results Among study participants, 5,470 (14%) had poor oral health. We found that poor oral health was associated with a 9% increase in WMH volume (beta = 0.09, standard deviation (SD) = 0.014, p P< 0.001), a 10% change in the aggregate FA score (beta = 0.10, SD = 0.013, P < 0.001), and a 5% change in the aggregate MD score (beta = 0.05, SD = 0.013, P < 0.001). Genetically-determined poor oral health was associated with a 30% increase in WMH volume (beta = 0.30, SD = 0.06, P < 0.001), a 43% change in aggregate FA score (beta = 0.42, SD = 0.06, P < 0.001), and an 10% change in aggregate MD score (beta = 0.10, SD = 0.03, P = 0.01).
Conclusions and Relevance Among middle age Britons without stroke or dementia enrolled in a large population study, poor oral health was associated with worse neuroimaging brain health profiles. Genetic analyses confirmed these associations, supporting a potential causal association. Because the neuroimaging markers evaluated in the current study are established risk factors for stroke and dementia, our results suggest that oral health may be a promising target for interventions focused on improving brain health.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
GJF is supported by the National Institutes of Health (P30AG021342), the American Heart Association (18IDDG34280056 and 817874) and the Neurocritical Care Society Research Fellowship. AdH is supported by NIH/NINDS funding (K23NS105924, R01NS130189). TMG is supported by P30AG021342.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study received approval from the North West Centre for Research Ethics Committee.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
