Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Surgical and percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with multivessel or left main disease; what happens beyond five years? A systematic review and study level meta-analysis of randomized trials

View ORCID ProfileFrancesco Formica, Daniel Hernandez-Vaquero, View ORCID ProfileDomenico Tuttolomondo, Alan Gallingani, Gurmeet Singh, Claudia Pattuzzi, Giampaolo Niccoli, View ORCID ProfileRoberto Lorusso, Francesco Nicolini
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.17.23287425
Francesco Formica
aUniversity of Parma, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Parma, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Francesco Formica
Daniel Hernandez-Vaquero
bCardiac Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Domenico Tuttolomondo
cCardiology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Domenico Tuttolomondo
Alan Gallingani
dCardiac Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gurmeet Singh
eDepartment of Critical Care Medicine and Division of Cardiac Surgery, Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claudia Pattuzzi
aUniversity of Parma, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Parma, Italy
dCardiac Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giampaolo Niccoli
aUniversity of Parma, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Parma, Italy
dCardiac Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roberto Lorusso
fCardio-Thoracic Department, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Heart and Vascular Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
gCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Roberto Lorusso
Francesco Nicolini
aUniversity of Parma, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Parma, Italy
dCardiac Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: francescoformica.hs@gmail.com francesco.formica@unipr.it
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Meta-analysis exploring outcomes beyond 5-years of trials comparing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) utilizing drug-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), are missing. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare very long-term outcomes, between the two interventions.

Using electronic databases, we retrieved 4 trials, between January, 2010 and January, 2023. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves of endpoint was reconstructed. Comparisons were made by Cox-linear regression frailty model and by landmark analysis. A flexible parametric model for survival analysis was used to obtain the time-dependent hazard-ratio. A random-effect method was applied.

5180 patients were included and randomized to CABG (n=2586) or PCI with DES (n=2594). During 10-year follow-up, PCI showed an overall higher incidence of all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.19; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.104-1.32; p=0.008)]. At landmark analysis, PCI showed higher risk of the endpoint within 5-years (HR 1.2; 95% CI, 1.06-1.53; p=0.008) while no difference was found at 5–10-year period (HR,1.03; 95%CI, 0.84-1.26; p=0.76). The time-varying HR analysis of PCI versus CABG was consistent with the results of the landmark analysis. There was no long-term difference between the two interventions for myocardial infarction (MI) (OR,1.42; 95%CI, 0.92-2.18; p=0.11), composite of all-cause mortality, stroke or MI (OR,1.07; 95%CI, 0.84-1.36; p=0.57), stroke (OR,0.97; 95%CI, 0.59-1.59; p=0.91) and cardiovascular death (OR,1.02; 95%CI, 0.75-1.40; p=0.90), while PCI was associated with an increased risk for repeat revascularization (OR,2.11; 95%CI, 1.58-2.81; p<0.001) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (OR,1.41; 95%CI, 1.13-1.75; p<0.0001). In conclusion, in patients with CAD, there was a significantly overall higher incidence of all-cause mortality after PCI compared to CABG beyond 5-year follow-up. Specifically, CABG is still favorable beyond 5 years and maintains its gold standard role for the CAD treatment; PCI has an evident higher mortality during the first 5 years and a comparable outcome beyond 5 years.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This meta-analysis was performed without funding.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Not Applicable

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

As the aggregated data were extracted from the published articles included in the analysis, this meta-analysis is exempted from Ethical Committee evaluation as the investigators of each trial obtained the approval from the local Ethical Committees.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Not Applicable

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Not Applicable

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Not Applicable

Data Availability

The data collection forms, data extracted from included studies and all other data and materials used in this meta-analysis will be available and sharable on specific and reasonable request to the corresponding author.

  • Abbreviations

    CABG
    coronary artery bypass grafting.
    PCI
    percutaneous coronary intervention
    DES
    drug-eluting stent
    CAD
    coronary artery disease
    LMD
    left main disease
    MVD
    multivessel disease
    RCT
    randomized controlled trial
    OR
    odd ratio
    HR
    hazard ratio
    CI
    confidence interval
    RMST
    restricted mean survival time
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted March 18, 2023.
    Download PDF
    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Surgical and percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with multivessel or left main disease; what happens beyond five years? A systematic review and study level meta-analysis of randomized trials
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Surgical and percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with multivessel or left main disease; what happens beyond five years? A systematic review and study level meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Francesco Formica, Daniel Hernandez-Vaquero, Domenico Tuttolomondo, Alan Gallingani, Gurmeet Singh, Claudia Pattuzzi, Giampaolo Niccoli, Roberto Lorusso, Francesco Nicolini
    medRxiv 2023.03.17.23287425; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.17.23287425
    Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Surgical and percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with multivessel or left main disease; what happens beyond five years? A systematic review and study level meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Francesco Formica, Daniel Hernandez-Vaquero, Domenico Tuttolomondo, Alan Gallingani, Gurmeet Singh, Claudia Pattuzzi, Giampaolo Niccoli, Roberto Lorusso, Francesco Nicolini
    medRxiv 2023.03.17.23287425; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.17.23287425

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Cardiovascular Medicine
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (228)
    • Allergy and Immunology (504)
    • Anesthesia (110)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (1238)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (206)
    • Dermatology (147)
    • Emergency Medicine (282)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (531)
    • Epidemiology (10020)
    • Forensic Medicine (5)
    • Gastroenterology (499)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2452)
    • Geriatric Medicine (236)
    • Health Economics (479)
    • Health Informatics (1642)
    • Health Policy (752)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (636)
    • Hematology (248)
    • HIV/AIDS (533)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11864)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (626)
    • Medical Education (252)
    • Medical Ethics (74)
    • Nephrology (268)
    • Neurology (2280)
    • Nursing (139)
    • Nutrition (352)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (454)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (536)
    • Oncology (1245)
    • Ophthalmology (377)
    • Orthopedics (134)
    • Otolaryngology (226)
    • Pain Medicine (157)
    • Palliative Medicine (50)
    • Pathology (324)
    • Pediatrics (730)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (312)
    • Primary Care Research (282)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2280)
    • Public and Global Health (4832)
    • Radiology and Imaging (837)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (491)
    • Respiratory Medicine (651)
    • Rheumatology (285)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (238)
    • Sports Medicine (227)
    • Surgery (267)
    • Toxicology (44)
    • Transplantation (125)
    • Urology (99)