Abstract
Background The World Health Organization recommends rational drug usage to protect patient health and quality of life. Study assessed the quality of drug prescription and dispensing in a tertiary hospital.
Methods Cross-sectional study with retrospective and prospective data collection underpinned by the WHO core prescribing indicators. A cluster sample of 10 clinical units and their attached pharmacies in the hospital. Six hundred prescriptions from the pharmacy over six months were randomly selected to evaluate the prescription indicators, 330 patient encounters observed for patient care indicators, and 48 randomly selected doctors to evaluate factors influencing their prescribing practices across the 10 clinics. Descriptive analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25 and comparison done across all indicators of rational drug use.
Results Average drugs per encounter was 3.4 ± 1.9 drugs. Antibiotics and injections were prescribed in 40.2% and 24.8% encounters respectively. Generic names were used in 43.6% and 97.1% of prescription were from the essential medicine list. Average time for consultation was 17.5 ± 8.0 minutes, dispensing time was 7.7 ± 3.8 minutes, 99.8% of medications were properly labelled, and 82% of patients understood the drug doses. The pharmacies stocked 93.3% of key drugs but no consultation room had the essential drug list. Only 43.7% of physicians demonstrated accurate understanding of rational drug use.
Conclusion Findings on the WHO core drug indicators showed poor quality of drug prescription. Brand prescription, polypharmacy, and antibiotic overuse observed requires intensifying training and monitoring on rational drug use.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors received no specific funding for this work
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital Ethics Review Committee
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest: None declared
Data Availability
The data underlying the results presented is attached to this submission
