PRACTICES OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY AND EXPERIENCE OF OCCUPATIONAL HAZARDS AMONG SOLID WASTE MANAGERS IN PORT HARCOURT METROPOLIS OF RIVERS STATE

INTRODUCTION

indiscriminate waste disposal methods and inadequate waste collection has continuously posed as the most intractable problem of waste management (WM) in Nigeria, especially in the Niger Delta Region.^1,2 According to the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), most cities in the world produce an average of 1.9 billion tons of Solid Waste (SW) yearly, with those in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) producing an estimated 62 million tons per year.³ Hoornweg and Bhada-Tata⁴ added that cities throughout the world produced 1.3 billion tons of SW in 2012, with that figure anticipated to rise to 2.2 billion tons by 2025. This is plainly too much for local waste management authorities to handle, due to the employment of inadequate labour-intensive (manual) procedures that forms the modus operandi in many developing countries. Though this manual method of SW collection and management has some advantages in terms of employment, it has also been known to cause occupational injuries and diseases such as acute diarrhoea, cholera, dysentery, injuries from sharp objects, malaria, respiratory disease, typhoid fever, strains from lifting, and contact with pathogens for those who collect anaerobic waste.⁵ It is therefore unsurprising that this hazardous job has a death rate of about 90 per 100,000 garbage collectors globally.⁶

Solid Waste Collectors (SWCs) are frequently engaged in risky working circumstances with poor pay and minimal social protection. Hence, Madian and El-Wahed⁶ stated that the occupation is ranked as the seventh most dangerous occupation in the world. Some of the contributors to this outcome include the fact that the job requires a lot of physical efforts, such as hand lifting and carrying of heavy bins, exposure to sharp metals, and involves operating on a truck that goes through traffic all year.⁷ Such individuals are also exposed to an array of pathogenic substances (bacteria, fungi, viruses, parasites, and cysts), toxic substances, waste-related and decomposition-related chemicals, as well as vehicle exhaust fumes, noise, extreme temperatures, and UV radiation, in the course of carrying out the jobs.⁸ This is more prominent in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) like Nigeria., as the World Health Organization (WHO) reported that SWCs in developing countries are three times more likely to develop allergic respiratory disease, one and a half times more likely to develop non-allergic respiratory disease, three times more likely to develop chronic bronchitis, and six times more likely to develop infectious diseases.^6,9 Hence, this study was set at determining the prevalence of the experience of occupational hazards among the solid waste collectors or managers in Port Harcourt Metropolis and their practice of Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) in the process of carrying out their jobs.

METHODOLOGY

RESULTS

Practice of Occupational Health and Safety

Analysis of the result of the practice of OHS as presented in figure 1 showed that 87.1% of the respondents had a good level of practices of OHS while 12.9% had a poor level of OHS practices. the result of the occurrence of work-related injuries as presented in figure 2 above revealed that 195 (61.5%) of the respondents had experienced work-related injuries/accidents within the last 12 months, with cuts (30.0%) puncture wounds (20.5%) and road accidents (20.2%) as the most experienced hazards.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Table 1:

Practice of occupational health and safety by waste managers in Port Harcourt

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2:

Experience of work-related injuries/accidents and the type of injuries/accidents

Experience of OHS

Figure 3 above presents the rate of hospitalization due to work-related hazards and illness. According to the result, 32.2% of the respondents reported that they have even been hospitalized due to work-related hazards, with allergies (23.2%) and rash/other skin diseases (22.1%) identified as the most experienced type of illness

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 3:

Rate of hospitalization due to work-related hazards and illness ever been experienced

Discussion of Result

Poor working conditions and a lack of protective equipment lead to higher accident rates among waste managers in most developing nations, particularly in SSA and Asia.²⁰ According to Aweng and Fatt,²¹ the process of managing waste entails a wide variety of activities, with various types of dangers present at every stage of the process, from the point of collection at households through transportation and recycling or disposal locations.⁶ Though PPEs may not completely avoid exposure to various types of accidents, their frequent use by waste handlers would greatly lower the likelihood of exposure to hazardous compounds contained in the waste stream.^11,12 The majority of waste managers in this study had good OHS practices (87.1%), while the total usage of PPE was 90.9%, with the frequency of use being occasionally (42.0%) and hand gloves being the most commonly used PPE. This is higher in comparison with the results reported in the studies of Kretchy¹³ in Ghana and Wahab and Ogunlolo¹⁴ in Ekiti state, Nigeria, who found 72.6% and 60% excellent safety procedures, respectively. Also, this finding outperformed Bogale and Tefara¹⁵ and Miwano et al^.10 who found that only 22%, 30%, and 24.06% of SWC had effective safety procedures, respectively. Sawyerr et al.¹⁶ found that the majority (91.7%) of municipal SWCs in Ilorin, Nigeria, did not utilize PPE, while Madian and El-Wahed⁶ reported that 65% of the SWC in their study used PPE on the job, with safety boots being the most commonly used PPE (73.8%). Diwe et al.¹⁷ did report that the overall PPE use in their study was 66.7%, with 56.1% using it always, while Bogale et al.¹⁵ found that just 43.6% of SWC used PPE, with only a fifth reporting that they did not use it on a regular basis. This high level of good practice and PPE usage among respondents might be attributed to governmental enforcement, effective worker education or pre-job training, and careful monitoring to ensure that particular laid-down criteria are followed.^10,13,14 The limited use of PPE, on the other hand, can be attributed to a lack of assistance from the necessary authorities in terms of providing particular kits.¹⁰

In the current research, 61.5% of the SWCs said they had been exposed to work-related incidents such as cuts, punctures, and traffic accidents in the past 12 months while doing their duties. This is higher in comparison with the findings of Alshebli et al.²² where 56% of SWC were highly exposed to occupational accidents, while the studies of Marahatta et al.²³ and Madian and El-Wahed⁶ reported higher exposure of SWCs to work-related accidents (80% and 76% respectively), with needle stick injury, falls, fissure feet and contusions, puncture wounds and lacerations, fracture, animal bites, and chemical injuries reported as the most frequently occurring. Similarly, Eskezia et al.²⁴ also reported the occurrence of injuries such as cuts from sharp equipment on their hands or legs, and hand fractures as a result of falling among the SWCs in their study. The occurrence of these types of injuries could be associated with a lack of waste segregation and appropriate disposal mechanisms by households and even healthcare facilities. Also, most dumpsites are located along the roads and this exposes the workers to road traffic accidents.

In the area of work-related illnesses and diseases, 32% of the SWCs stated that they had been hospitalized in the previous year due to work-related diseases such as allergies, rashes, typhoid, eye irritation, and other respiratory difficulties. In contrast to this, an Indian study by Jayakrishnan, Jeeja, and Bhaskar²⁵ found that only 13.1% of SWCs in their study had been hospitalized for a work-related illness, while Madian and El-Wahed⁶ reported that almost half of the managers in their study had previously been hospitalized due to a work-related illness, with gastrointestinal issues (worm infection), eye issues (redness), skin issues (itching, nail infection, and scabies), respiratory issues (cough and dyspnea), and musculoskeletal discomfort (neck and low back pain) among them. Purushottam et al.²⁶ reported that 89% of waste managers in Bombay city had eye problems (burning sensation, watering redness, and itching), while Abou-Elwafa et al.²⁷ and Garrido et al.²⁸ found that 90% and 61% of waste managers in Germany and Egypt, respectively, had musculoskeletal complaints. Cough, cholera, asthmatic attacks, trouble breathing, skin disorders, eye irritation, dysentery, and typhoid fever were reported by waste managers in Lagos and Ibadan.¹²

In accordance with this report, Madian and El-Wahed⁶ reported that the amount of time SWCs spend executing their normal operations increases their sensitivity to various ailments and the need for hospitalization, while Malta-Vacas et al.²⁹ reported that working with waste for longer periods of time causes serious GI problems due to their exposure to a variety of diseases, vectors, and direct skin contact with materials containing flora spores, bacteria, viruses, and parasitic ova, all of which cause gastrointestinal discomfort. Also, Otitoju¹⁸ stated that waste management places a significant strain on the musculoskeletal system, particularly the back, while Reddy and Yasobant¹⁹ and Thakur and Ganguly¹¹ stated that this could be as a result of carrying, pulling/pushing of bins and containers, which involves static muscle contraction and increases the risk of musculoskeletal disorders and hospitalisation.

Conclusion and Recommendation

This study reported a high practice of OHS and usage of PPEs (especially hand gloves), as well as a high rate of occurrence of work-related accidents (cuts, punctures, and traffic accidents) and a lower rate of occurrence of work-related illnesses and diseases (allergies, rashes, typhoid, eye irritation, and other respiratory difficulties) in the last 12 months before the study. This calls for increased governmental budgetary allocation and Non-governmental organisation (NGO) involvement in this sector in the area of the provision of complete and appropriate PPEs meant for the SWCs in the process of carrying out their work. Also, necessary OHS training and retraining tailored specifically for SWCs is required to help enlighten them more on the hazards associated with their work as well as the importance of compliance with PPEs.

Conflicts of interest

The authors hereby declare no conflict of interest.