ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION Three distinct pathophysiological subtypes of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have been identified based on CSF proteomics. We aim to estimate the potential incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of individualized hypothetical AD pharmacological treatment through stratification by these subtypes.
METHODS In a model-based health-economic evaluation usual care was compared to A) hypothetical treatment to in all subtypes and B) hypothetical treatment to those categorized as subtype 1 (high levels of BACE1) based on CSF proteomics; in a population of persons with MCI and positive amyloid and assuming hypothetical treatment efficacy in this subtype 1 only.
RESULTS The potential incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was k€36 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) for strategy A (no subtyping test, hypothetical treatment in all subtypes) as compared to usual care, and k€22 for strategy B (subtyping and hypothetical treatment for subtype 1 only) as compared to usual care. Compared to strategy A, strategy B was dominant, in terms of no difference in QALY and mean cost savings of k€6 per person.
DISCUSSION Given the assumptions in this study, individualized hypothetical AD pharmacological treatment of specific subgroups of AD patients, here based on a proteomics biomarker profile, has the potential to gain health-economic benefits. Future research should focus on retrospective analysis of trial data to generate empirical evidence on treatment effect between CSF proteomics subgroups.
Competing Interest Statement
Ron Handels reports the following related to this study: grant (paid to department) from ZonMw (NL public funding; 2017-2024 dossier number 70-73305-98-1219). Ron Handels reports the following in the past 36 months outside this study: Funding (paid to department) from Karolinska Institutet via affiliation, related to projects: SNAC (Sweden public funding 2016-2018), MIND-AD (public-private EU JPND grant 2017-2018), PRODEMOS (public EU H2020 2019-2023), SveDem (Sweden public-private collaboration 2019-2020), EUROFINGERS (public-private EU JPND; 2020-2023); funding (paid to department) from Radboud University Nijmegen, related to project: AI-MIND (EU H2020 public funding 2021-2023); grants (paid to department) from RECAGE H2020 (EU public funding; 2018-2022); grants (paid to department) from various ZonMw and NWO projects (NL public funding; 2017-20284); grants (paid to department) from patient association Alzheimer Nederland (NL fellowship; 2017-2019; WE.15-2016-09); grants (paid to department) from ROADMAP (IMI2; public-private collaboration; 2016-2019); consulting fees (paid to department) from Lilly Nederland B.V. (advisory; 2022-2023); consulting fees (paid to department) from institute for Medical Technology Assessment (advisory; 2021; content initiated by Biogen); consulting fees (paid to department) from Biogen Netherlands BV (advisory; 2021); consulting fees (paid to department) from Biogen MA Inc. (advisory; 2020); consulting fees (paid to department) from Eisai Inc. (advisory; 2019). Linus Jonsson reports the following related to this study: none. Linus Jonsson reports the following in the past 36 months outside this study: employment at H.Lundbeck (ended 2021). Charlotte Teunissen is supported by the European Commission (Marie Curie International Training Network, grant agreement No 860197 (MIRIADE), Innovative Medicines Initiatives 3TR (Horizon 2020, grant no 831434) EPND (IMI 2 Joint Undertaking (JU) under grant agreement No. 101034344grant no) and JPND (bPRIDE), National MS Society (Progressive MS alliance) and Health Holland, the Dutch Research Council (ZonMW), Alzheimer Drug Discovery Foundation, The Selfridges Group Foundation, Alzheimer Netherlands, Alzheimer Association. Charlotte Teunissen is recipient of ABOARD, which is a public-private partnership receiving funding from ZonMW (#73305095007) and Health∼Holland, Topsector Life Sciences & Health (PPP-allowance; #LSHM20106). ABOARD also receives funding from Edwin Bouw Fonds and Gieskes-Strijbisfonds. Charlotte Teunissen has a collaboration contract with ADx Neurosciences, Quanterix and Eli Lilly, performed contract research or received grants from AC-Immune, Axon Neurosciences, Bioconnect, Bioorchestra, Brainstorm Therapeutics, Celgene, EIP Pharma, Eisai, Grifols, Novo Nordisk, PeopleBio, Roche, Toyama, Vivoryon. She serves on editorial boards of Medidact Neurologie/Springer, Alzheimer Research and Therapy, Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation, and is editor of a Neuromethods book Springer. Betty Tijms and Pieter Jelle Visser are the inventors of the CSF proteomic profile definition of Alzheimer's disease sub-types and have a patent pending (#19165795.6; Applicant: Stichting VUmc). Kirsten Wesenhagen declares no competing interests with the content of this article.
Funding Statement
This work has been supported by ZonMW Memorabel grant program dossier number 70-73305-98-1219.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
