Abstract
Introduction Oesophagectomy is a complex procedure performed for malignant and benign conditions. Post-oesophagectomy conduit dysfunction is common, which can occur for several reasons including conduit dysmotility. However, reliable tools for evaluating conduit motility are lacking. A non-invasive device for gastric electrical mapping was recently developed to evaluate gastric electrical activity and function. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of BSGM in the post-oesophagectomy stomach.
Methods Oesophagectomy patients from Auckland, New Zealand, were recruited. The Gastric Alimetry System® (New Zealand) was employed, comprising a stretchable array (8×8 electrodes), a wearable Reader, and validated iOS app for symptom logging. The protocol comprised a 30-minute baseline, a meal challenge, then 4 hours of post-prandial recordings. Analysis encompassed Principal Gastric Frequency, BMI-adjusted amplitude, Gastric Alimetry Rhythm Index (indicating rhythm stability), meal response, and symptoms. Adverse events were recorded.
Results 6 patients were recruited and gastric activity was successfully captured in all except one with the colonic interposition (negative control). Four patients showed abnormalities indicating post-operative gastric hypofunction: four with low or abnormal frequency (<2.65 cycles/min), three with low amplitude (<22μV), two with low GA-RI (<0.25) and one with a reduced meal response. One patient had significant symptoms (nausea, early satiation) who demonstrated marked hypomotility in all four of these domains. No adverse events occurred.
Conclusion Gastric Alimetry is a safe and feasible technique to non-invasively assess gastric conduit motility following oesophagectomy. Parameters may need adjustment for post-surgical anatomy. Clinical studies assessing the role in diagnosis and therapy can be advanced.
Competing Interest Statement
AG, SC and GOG are shareholders of Alimetry Ltd. There are no other conflicts of interest
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the New Zealand Health Research Council, The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons John Mitchell Crouch Fellowship (GOG), the National Institutes of Health (R56 126935), and the Auckland Medical Research Foundation Douglas Goodfellow Medical Research Fellowship (THHW).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Auckland Health Research Ethics Committee of The University of Auckland gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding This work was supported by the New Zealand Health Research Council, The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons John Mitchell Crouch Fellowship (GOG), the National Institutes of Health (R56 126935), and the Auckland Medical Research Foundation Douglas Goodfellow Medical Research Fellowship (THHW).
Research Ethics All human studies were undertaken with written informed consent (as per the consent form confirmed by the Auckland Health Research Ethics Committee).
Conflict of Interest AG, SC and GOG are shareholders of Alimetry Ltd. There are no other conflicts of interest
Data Availability Data from this study have not been entered in a public repository. Instead, the data used in this study are clearly illustrated in the Figures and the Supplementary Table.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript