Abstract
Subthalamic nucleus (STN) beta-triggered adaptive deep brain stimulation (ADBS) has been shown to provide clinical improvement comparable to conventional continuous DBS (CDBS) in people with Parkinson’s disease (PD) with less energy delivered to the brain and less stimulation induced side-effects. However, several questions remain unanswered. First, there is a normal physiological reduction of STN beta band power just prior to and during voluntary movement. ADBS systems will therefore reduce or cease stimulation during movement and could therefore compromise motor performance compared to CDBS. Second, beta power was smoothed and estimated over time periods of 400ms or longer in most previous ADBS studies. A shorter smoothing period could have the advantage of being more sensitive to changes in beta power which could enhance motor performance. In this study, we addressed these two questions by evaluating the effectiveness of STN beta-triggered ADBS using a standard 400ms and a shorter 200ms smoothing window during reaching movements. Results from 13 people with PD showed that STN beta-triggered ADBS is effective in improving motor performance during reaching movements as it better preserves gamma oscillation than CDBS in people with PD, and that shortening the smoothing window does not result in any additional behavioural benefit. ADBS significantly improved tremor compared with no DBS but was not as effective as CDBS. When developing ADBS systems for PD, it might not be necessary to track very fast beta dynamics; combining beta, gamma, and motor decoding might be more beneficial with additional biomarkers needed for optimal treatment of tremor.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
ISRCTN15101017
Funding Statement
This study was funded by by BRAIN Non-Clinical Post-Doctoral Fellowship (HMR04170) and Medical Research Council, UKRI (MC_UU_00003/2)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee of University of Oxford gave ethical approval for this work (19/SC/0550)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data and codes will be shared on the data sharing platform of the MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit.
