EPHB4 mutations in dilated cardiomyopathy

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the western world (Timmis et al., 2020). Among CVD, dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is one the most common type of heart disease with an estimated prevalence of 1:2500 in the general population (Hershberger et al., 2013). DCM patients are characterized by the dilation of the left ventricle and contractile dysfunction (Weintraub et al., 2017). The definition of DCM excludes ischemic heart disease, although ischemic events as induced by myocardial infarction can lead to similar remodelling processes and contractile dysfunction resembling DCM (Reichart et al., 2019).

The most common causes of DCM underlie inflammation, nutritive-toxic influence, or metabolic disorders (McKenna et al., 2017) but mutations on genes encoding cytoskeletal, sarcomere or nuclear envelope proteins account for about 35% of DCM cases (Weintraub et al., 2017). Increasing evidence shows that heart disease is associated with microvascular dysfunction (Luxán and Dimmeler, 2021). Endothelial cell CD36 is required for the uptake of circulating fatty acids into the cardiac muscle (Son et al., 2018). In the mouse, interference with endothelial nutrient transport resulted in reduced cardiac function (Jabs et al., 2018). Specifically, endothelial specific deletion of EphB4, or its ligand ephrin-B2, induces cardiac remodelling and a phenotype that mimics human DCM features and development (Luxán et al., 2019). Mechanistically, EphB4 deficient endothelial cells are characterized by compromised caveolar function and reduced CAV1 phosphorylation. Caveolae are required for the correct membrane translocation of the fatty acid translocase FAT/CD36 (Ring et al., 2006) and fatty acids are used by cardiomyocytes to obtain about 50% to 70% of their energy (Lopaschuk et al., 2010).

In the present study we report the presence of EPHB4 variant carriers in a cohort of DCM patients. These patients, similar to the EphB4 mutant mice, show dysregulated expression of CAV1 and CD36. Our results confirm a crucial role of the Eph-ephrin signalling pathway in DCM.

Results

To assess if EPHB4 mutations might play a role in human heart failure, we analysed the EPHB4 sequences of in total 573 DCM patients, which were either enrolled in the TranslatiOnal Registry for CardiomyopatHies-Plus (TORCH-Plus-DZHK21) (Seyler et al., 2017), or recruited at the Institute for Cardiomyopathies Heidelberg (ICH). In six patients, of which we also had histology available, we found six new rare variants (Table 1). Three of the newly identified variants are located in the extracellular domain of EPHB4, two of them in the ligand binding domain of the protein and another one on the cysteine rich domain before the two fibronectin type III domains. The other three variants are located in the intracellular part of the EPHB4 protein, in the tyrosine kinase domain (Figure 1A). In four of these patients we did not detect any mutation in genes previously related to DCM while in the other two patients we could also detect a truncating RMB20 or TTN variants. In order to understand whether these new rare EPHB4 variants could be implicated in the disease, we analysed DCM patients carrying the heterozygous EPHB4 variant and DCM patients no such variant. We furthermore compared the results with a biopsy obtained from a healthy donor. The basal characteristics of the patients can be found on Table 2.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1. EPHB4 mutations in human DCM patients.

(A) Scheme depicting the EPHB4 protein with the mutations indicated in the protein domains. (LBD, ligand binding domain; CRD, cysteinerich domain; FNIII, fibronectin type III; TM, transmembrane domain; TK, tyrosine kinase; SAM, sterile alpha domain). (B, C, D) Immunohistochemistry of cardiac biopsies from healthy donor (B), DCM patients with reference genotype (C), and DCM patients carrying the EPHB4 variant (D). CAV1 and CD36 expression is altered in both DCM conditions. CD36 expression is reduced in the EPHB4 variant carrying patients and it colocalizes with CAV1 in the cardiomyocytes (arrowheads). (E) EPHB4 expression in the human heart analysed by single-nuclei RNA sequencing. Cardiac cells are displayed in a UMAP plot. Although EPHB4 is mainly expressed by endothelial cells, EPHB4 is also expressed in some cardiomyocytes. Colour reflects expression levels in each nucleus. (CM, cardiomyocyte; FB, fibroblasts; IC, immune cell; EC, endothelial cell; MC, mural cell).

Histological analysis of cardiac biopsies obtained from these patients compared to biopsies from DCM patients with reference genotype and healthy donors revealed that, similar to what we found in EphB4 mutant mice (Luxán et al., 2019), the expression of CD36 and CAV1 is altered in DCM patients. CD36 is highly expressed in the capillaries and in the membrane of cardiomyocytes of healthy hearts, while CAV1 can be detected in the capillary endothelial cells (Figure 1B). In DCM patients which carry a wild type EPHB4 sequence, we noted that the expression of CD36 is abrogated and a disorganized expression of CAV1 can be observed in the cardiomyocytes (Figure 1C). On the contrary, in the EPHB4 variant carriers, the expression of CD36 is reduced in the membrane of cardiomyocytes but colocalizes with CAV1 in vesicle structures in the cardiomyocytes, suggesting impaired CD36 caveolar transport (Figure 1D, arrowheads). Interestingly, and different to the data on mouse (Luxán et al., 2019), the mis localization of CAV1 and CD36 was observed in cardiomyocytes.

Analysis of available human cardiac single-nuclei-RNA-sequencing (Nicin et al., 2022) revealed that EPHB4 is also expressed in human cardiomyocytes (Figure 1E) suggesting that EPHB4 signaling might not only occur in endothelial cells but also in cardiomyocytes.

Discussion

Our results suggest that the dysfunction of the EPHB4 receptor and its regulation of caveolae trafficking required for fatty acid uptake as a potential cause for DCM in human patients. Furthermore, our results stress the importance of the endothelium in the onset of cardiac disease as all DCM patients show a downregulation of CD36 in the endothelium. Nevertheless, although more abundantly expressed in endothelial cells, CD36 is also expressed in cardiomyocytes (Shu et al., 2022) and its loss in cardiomyocytes has already been related with the progression of heart failure (Sung et al., 2017; Umbarawan et al., 2018).

Cardiomyocytes are the cells responsible for generating contractile force in the heart and were traditionally at the center of interest in genetic studies. However, only about a third of DCM cases can be explained by mutations on cardiomyocyte genes (Weintraub et al., 2017). It became clear that the complex interplay between cardiomyocytes and the non-parenchymal endothelial, fibroblast and immune cells of the heart is necessary for tissue homeostasis (Tzahor and Dimmeler, 2022). Actually, non-parenchymal cells outnumber cardiomyocytes; about half of the cells comprise fibroblasts, while one forth are endothelial cells. This study suggests that mutations in genes crucial for other cell types beyond cardiomyocytes may contribute to DCM and warrants a more detailed assessment of genes involved in vascular dysfunction (Rhee et al., 2021). Attempts to use single-cell- and single-nucleus-RNA-sequencing of cardiac tissue of patients (Nicin et al., 2021; Reichart et al., 2022) to identify potential genes and pathways in the other cell types just started and certainly will enrich our understanding of the multi-cellular communication that is necessary to maintain cardiac health.

Our analysis identified several variants in EPHB4 in a cohort of DCM patients. Interestingly, according to the CADD score prediction (21,64 [IQR 19,41-23,50]), all variants have a deleterious potential. For example, the Pro79Leu amino acid shift in the ligand binding domain can increase helical structure and hydrophobicity around residue 79 (Chang and Tran, 1986) while in the Glu890Asp amino acid shift in the tyrosine kinase domain of the protein, aspartic acid has one methylene group less in its side chain than glutamic acid and the substitution of one with the other alters the unfolding transition temperature of a protein (Lee et al., 2004). A similar substitution is sufficient to alter the substrate specificity and catalytic activity of the β subunit in the tryptophan synthase bienzymatic complex from Salmonella typhimurium by altering the tertiary structure of the protein (Brzovic et al., 1992). This suggests that the presence of a Glu-Asp substitution on the tyrosine kinase domain of EphB4 could be deleterious for the human EphB4 protein. Furthermore, the binding of the ligand induces Eph receptor heterotetramers to initiate the signalling via Eph–Eph cis interactions (Pitulescu and Adams, 2010). Thus, variant EPHB4 molecules could have a dominant negative effect on these heterotetramers explaining why the presence of one variant copy in the DCM patients of our cohort would be sufficient to abrogate the function of the protein. The histology analysis of the cardiac biopsies revealed that independently of where in EPHB4 the variant was detected, the EPHB4 variant carrying patients show similar histological features and are different to the other DCM patients with a wild type EPHB4. This further supports, independently of the presence of variants in other genes, the importance of EPHB4 maintaining cardiac homeostasis in humans and its implication on DCM.

Overall, our study supports a critical role of the Eph-ephrin signalling pathway in cardiac endothelial cells but also in cardiomyocytes. Recent studies suggest that Eph receptor genes, including EPHB4, were downregulated in hypertrophic human hearts (Nicin et al., 2022) suggesting that a transcriptional or post transcriptional down-regulation of Eph receptors might also contribute to acquired forms of heart failure. Interestingly, beyond its function in the cellular membrane, circulating EPHB4 is associated with poor prognosis in heart failure (Bouwens et al., 2020).

Finally, this study not only confirms the crucial role of EphB4 in the heart, but it also corroborates the importance of CD36 and CAV1 for the cardiac health, and has the potential to improve diagnosis and risk stratification tools for DCM. In addition, as other genes crucial for fatty acid transport may be involved in cardiac disease, this study may help identify new diagnostic or therapeutic targets.

Competing interests

None

Methods