Abstract
Real World Data (RWD) has been identified as a key information source in health and social science research. An important, and readily available source of RWD is social media. Identifying the gender and age of the authors of social media posts is necessary for assessing the representativeness of the sample by these key demographics and enables researchers to study subgroups and disparities. However, deciphering the age and gender of social media users can be challenging. We present a scoping review of the literature and summarize the automated methods used to predict age and gender of Twitter users. We used a systematic search method to identify relevant literature, of which 74 met our inclusion criteria. We found that although methods to extract age and gender evolved over time to utilize deep neural networks, many still relied on more traditional machine learning methods. Gender prediction has achieved higher reported performance, while prediction of age performance lags, particularly for more granular age groups. However, the heterogeneous nature of the studies and the lack of consistent performance measures made it impossible to quantitively synthesize results. We found evidence that data bias is a prevalent problem and discuss suggestions to minimize it for future studies.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Library of Medicine under Grant number NIH NLM R01LM011176. The NIH National Library of Medicine funded this research but were not involved in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The search strategy and extracted data on included studies is available in the Supplementary Data.
