Abstract
Background Bariatric surgery has been widely recognized as the most efficient long-term treatment method in severe obesity, yet therapy success shows considerable interindividual variability. Postoperative metabolic adaptations, including improved gut hormone secretion (GLP-1, PYY and ghrelin), and restored executive function may play an explanatory role in weight loss, yet causes for poor success in individual patients remain unknown. This study investigates gut-hormonal and cognitive characteristics in extreme weight loss responders to bariatric surgery.
Methods Patients (n=47) with high or low excessive weight loss (EWL) at least 2 years after Roux-en-Y-gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy were allocated into good responders (GR, EWL 82.4 ± 11.6%) and poor responders (PR, EWL 24.0 ± SD 12.8%) to study differences in postprandial secretion of GLP-1, PYY, ghrelin and in working memory (WM).
Results Mean BMI was 47.1 ± 6.2 kg/m2 in poor responders (n=21) and 28.9 ± 3.1 kg/m2 in good responders (n=26, p < 0.001). Fasted GLP-1 and PYY were comparable for GR and PR (p > 0.2) and increased strongly after a standardized test meal (300 kcal liquid meal) with a peak at 15 to 30 minutes. The increase was stronger in GR compared to PR (GLP-1, PYY: Time x Group p < 0.05). Plasma ghrelin levels already differed between groups at fasted state, showing significantly higher levels for GR (p < 0.05). Postprandially, ghrelin secretion was suppressed in both groups, but suppression was higher in GR (Time x Group p < 0.05). GR showed significantly higher WM scores than PR (p < 0.05). Postprandial ghrelin (iAUC), but not GLP-1 or PYY release, significantly mediated the relationship between EWL and a WM subscore (IS score, CI = 0.07 - 1.68), but not WM main score (MIS score, CI = −0.07 - 1.54).
Conclusion Excess weight loss success after bariatric surgical procedures is associated with distinct profiles of gut-hormones at fasted and postprandial state, and differences in working memory. Working memory performance was partly mediated by postprandial incremental drops in ghrelin. Future studies need to integrate longitudinal data, larger samples and more sensitive cognitive tests.
Highlights
Fasted and postprandial gut hormone release differs between good and poor surgery responders
Good responders show higher working memory performance
Postprandial ghrelin dynamics mediate the relationship between excessive weight loss and a subscore of working memory performance
Longitudinal data are needed to investigate the gut-brain interactions with regard to cognitive functions after bariatric surgery
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) Projektnummer 209933838 SFB 1052 A05 (ML, AH); and Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Germany FKZ: 01E01501 (ML, AH, WKF). WKF was also funded by the DFG via the following grants: AOBJ: TRR 333/1-450149205, AOBJ: 667675, AOBJ: 676866 and AOBJ: 624808.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was accomplished in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was ethically approved by the ethics committee of the University of Leipzig (027/17-ek). Participants gave their written, informed consent before taking part in the study and were recompensed with 9-10 euros per hour.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
lammert{at}cbs.mpg.de, medawar{at}cbs.mpg.de, hehartmann{at}cbs.mpg.de, grasser{at}cbs.mpg.de, arne.dietrich{at}medizin.uni-leipzig.de, wiebke.fenske{at}ukbonn.de, annette.horstmann{at}helsinki.fi
Financial support This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – Projektnummer 209933838 – SFB 1052 - A05 (ML, AH); and Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Germany FKZ: 01E01501 (ML, AH, WKF). WKF was also funded by the DFG via the following grants: AOBJ: TRR 333/1-450149205, AOBJ: 667675, AOBJ: 676866 and AOBJ: 624808.
Disclosure The authors report no conflict of interest.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
