Abstract
Introduction Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a feared consequence of Covid 19 Pneumonia. Traditional guidance was for ARDS to be treated with Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation (IMV), when failing simple oxygen. However globally numbers of patients with Covid 19 ARDS (CARDS) quickly overwhelmed IMV capacity, with Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) has been used as a bridge or alternative to IMV. However, the evidence base remains limited in quality despite widespread adoption in guidelines.
Methods Pubmed (15.6.2022), Embase (30.7.2022) and Google Scholar (4.8.2022) were searched to identify studies with the primary outcome of IMV free survival in patients with CARDS receiving CPAP, ideally with simple oxygen as a comparator. Secondary outcomes were overall survival with CPAP, length of stay and adverse events. All studies were assessed by the relevant Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Tool (CASP).
Results 13 studies were identified, out of which only 1 was a Randomised Control Trial (RCT) with simple oxygen as a comparator. There were 11 Cohort studies and one Systematic review.
Discussion There is much heterogeneity in CPAP success rates (50 – 70%), which may be linked to variation in candidate selection, resource setting, application protocols and combined use with other respiratory support modalities (Non Invasive Ventilation – NIV, and High Flow Nasal Oxygen – HFNO). Adverse events and economic data such as length of stay are under reported.
Conclusion CPAP is an effective respiratory support in CARDS particularly in resource poor settings. However further research is needed to refine optimum candidate selection, application protocols and any added benefit from combination with NIV or HFNO.
No funding was received for this study. This review was not registered.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Pubmed, Embase, Google Scholar
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Contact: anbesan.hoole{at}gmail.com
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
