Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Bayes Factors for Two-group Comparisons in Cox Regression

View ORCID ProfileMaximilian Linde, View ORCID ProfileJorge N. Tendeiro, View ORCID ProfileDon van Ravenzwaaij
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.02.22281762
Maximilian Linde
1Unit of Psychometrics and Statistics, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Maximilian Linde
  • For correspondence: m.linde@rug.nl
Jorge N. Tendeiro
2Office of Research and Academia-Government-Community Collaboration, Education and Research Center for Artificial Intelligence and Data Innovation, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jorge N. Tendeiro
Don van Ravenzwaaij
1Unit of Psychometrics and Statistics, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Don van Ravenzwaaij
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

The use of Cox proportional hazards regression to analyze time-to-event data is ubiquitous in biomedical research. Typically, the frequentist framework is used to draw conclusions about whether hazards are different between patients in an experimental and a control condition. We offer a procedure to calculate Bayes factors for simple Cox models, both for the scenario where the full data is available and for the scenario where only summary statistics are available. The procedure is implemented in our “baymedr” R package. The usage of Bayes factors remedies some shortcomings of frequentist inference and has the potential to save scarce resources.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by a Dutch scientific organization VIDI fellowship grant (016.Vidi.188.001) to Don van Ravenzwaaij and a Japanese JSPS KAKENHI grant awarded to Jorge N. Tendeiro (21K20211).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced are available online at https://osf.io/37ut2/.

https://osf.io/37ut2/

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 07, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Bayes Factors for Two-group Comparisons in Cox Regression
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Bayes Factors for Two-group Comparisons in Cox Regression
Maximilian Linde, Jorge N. Tendeiro, Don van Ravenzwaaij
medRxiv 2022.11.02.22281762; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.02.22281762
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Bayes Factors for Two-group Comparisons in Cox Regression
Maximilian Linde, Jorge N. Tendeiro, Don van Ravenzwaaij
medRxiv 2022.11.02.22281762; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.02.22281762

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (269)
  • Allergy and Immunology (549)
  • Anesthesia (135)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1749)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (238)
  • Dermatology (172)
  • Emergency Medicine (310)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (654)
  • Epidemiology (10785)
  • Forensic Medicine (8)
  • Gastroenterology (584)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2935)
  • Geriatric Medicine (286)
  • Health Economics (531)
  • Health Informatics (1919)
  • Health Policy (833)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (743)
  • Hematology (290)
  • HIV/AIDS (627)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12501)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (684)
  • Medical Education (299)
  • Medical Ethics (86)
  • Nephrology (322)
  • Neurology (2785)
  • Nursing (150)
  • Nutrition (431)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (556)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (597)
  • Oncology (1458)
  • Ophthalmology (441)
  • Orthopedics (172)
  • Otolaryngology (255)
  • Pain Medicine (190)
  • Palliative Medicine (56)
  • Pathology (380)
  • Pediatrics (865)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (362)
  • Primary Care Research (334)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2633)
  • Public and Global Health (5342)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1004)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (595)
  • Respiratory Medicine (724)
  • Rheumatology (329)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (289)
  • Sports Medicine (278)
  • Surgery (327)
  • Toxicology (47)
  • Transplantation (149)
  • Urology (125)