Abstract
Each clinical trial faces numerous risks. Neglecting or reacting spontaneously at each materialized risk may delay trial completion, affect trial objectives and even derail the clinical trial. At the same time, pre-allocating excessive contingency resources to eliminate all potential risks, even with a low probability of occurrence and impact, may not be necessary. Therefore, optimal risk planning means finding the “right” balance between contingency resources, risk mitigation strategy, and risk tolerance.
Most risk planning publications focus only on risk identification and risk assessment. Risk mitigation strategy planning is often overlooked. A contingency budget is routinely assigned as a percentage of a clinical trial budget, e.g., 10-20%, and is not aligned with the clinical trial risk level. Therefore, to derive an effective clinical trial risk mitigation strategy, a new methodology based on mathematical modeling was developed and validated for a Ph2 clinical trial.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study used simulated data to validate the technique
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
vladimir.shnaydman{at}orbeeconsulting.com
The text was updated for clarity. Several figures were combined. The tables were corrected.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
