Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

What is the impact of high-profile end-of-life disputes on Paediatric Intensive Care (PIC) trainees? Original research

View ORCID ProfileClare Bell, Mariana Dittborn, View ORCID ProfileJoe Brierley
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.23.22281413
Clare Bell
1Paediatric Bioethics Centre; University College London, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre. London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Clare Bell
  • For correspondence: clarebell1@nhs.net
Mariana Dittborn
1Paediatric Bioethics Centre; University College London, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre. London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joe Brierley
1Paediatric Bioethics Centre; University College London, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre. London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Joe Brierley
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction This study explores UK Paediatric Intensive Care (PIC) trainees’ thoughts and feelings about high-profile end-of-life cases recently featured in the press and social media and the impact on their career intentions.

Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine PIC-GRID trainees (Apr-Aug 2021). Interview transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results Six main themes were identified: (i) All participants wished to do what was best for the child, feeling conflicted if this meant disagreeing with parents. (ii) Interviewees felt unprepared and expressed deep concern about the effect of high-profile cases on their future career. (iii) They highlighted too often being shielded from involvement in challenging discussions. (iv) Working in a supportive environment is crucial, underscoring the importance of clear and unified team communication, but specific training on the ethical and legal nuances of such cases is required. (vi) All had purposefully minimised their social media presence. (vi) All had reconsidered training in PIC due to concerns about future high-profile end-of-life disputes; despite describing this as a cause of concern and anxiety, all were still in training.

Conclusion UK PIC trainees feel unprepared and anxious about future high-profile cases. A parallel can be drawn to child protection improvements following significant educational investment after Government reports into preventable child abuse deaths. Models for supporting trainees and establishing formal PIC training are required to improve trainees’ confidence and skills in managing high-profile cases. Further research with other professional groups, the families involved, and other stakeholders would provide a more rounded picture.

  • What is already known on this topic – PIC trainees report high levels of distress associated to children’s death and disagreements with the families.

  • What this study adds – PIC doctors are extremely concerned about future high-profile end-of-life disputes, the effect on themselves and their career. They feel unprepared to manage them and require more training, experience and recognition of this.

  • How this study might affect research, practice or policy – PIC trainee curriculum and training scheme should prepare doctors to deal with high-profile end-of-life cases to ensure children and families receive appropriate care and avoid PIC-induced moral injury and workforce burdens.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Study approval by GOSH-Clinical Research Adoptions Committee (ID 20HL11), UCL-ethics committee (ID 18271/001), and the Health Research Authority Research Ethics Committee (ID 278437).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Deidentified participant interview transcripts, are available from Dr Clare Bell, ORCID identifier 0000-0002-8331-5758 reuse is permitted after discussion with the research team in related research.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 25, 2022.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
What is the impact of high-profile end-of-life disputes on Paediatric Intensive Care (PIC) trainees? Original research
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
What is the impact of high-profile end-of-life disputes on Paediatric Intensive Care (PIC) trainees? Original research
Clare Bell, Mariana Dittborn, Joe Brierley
medRxiv 2022.10.23.22281413; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.23.22281413
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
What is the impact of high-profile end-of-life disputes on Paediatric Intensive Care (PIC) trainees? Original research
Clare Bell, Mariana Dittborn, Joe Brierley
medRxiv 2022.10.23.22281413; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.23.22281413

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Pediatrics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (227)
  • Allergy and Immunology (501)
  • Anesthesia (110)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1233)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (206)
  • Dermatology (147)
  • Emergency Medicine (282)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (529)
  • Epidemiology (10012)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (498)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2448)
  • Geriatric Medicine (236)
  • Health Economics (479)
  • Health Informatics (1636)
  • Health Policy (751)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (635)
  • Hematology (248)
  • HIV/AIDS (532)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11860)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (625)
  • Medical Education (252)
  • Medical Ethics (74)
  • Nephrology (268)
  • Neurology (2277)
  • Nursing (139)
  • Nutrition (350)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (452)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (534)
  • Oncology (1245)
  • Ophthalmology (375)
  • Orthopedics (133)
  • Otolaryngology (226)
  • Pain Medicine (155)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (324)
  • Pediatrics (729)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (311)
  • Primary Care Research (282)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2280)
  • Public and Global Health (4828)
  • Radiology and Imaging (834)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (490)
  • Respiratory Medicine (650)
  • Rheumatology (283)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (237)
  • Sports Medicine (226)
  • Surgery (266)
  • Toxicology (44)
  • Transplantation (125)
  • Urology (99)