Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

The Novel Psychoactive Substances Epidemic: a Scientometric Perspective

View ORCID ProfileMichelle Jin Yee Neoh, View ORCID ProfileAlessandro Carollo, View ORCID ProfileMengyu Lim, Ornella Corazza, Aurora Coppola, View ORCID ProfileGianluca Esposito
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.16.22281132
Michelle Jin Yee Neoh
aPsychology Program, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 639818, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michelle Jin Yee Neoh
Alessandro Carollo
bDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Rovereto, TN, 38068, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alessandro Carollo
Mengyu Lim
aPsychology Program, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 639818, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mengyu Lim
Ornella Corazza
bDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Rovereto, TN, 38068, Italy
cSchool of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aurora Coppola
dPsychology Unit, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy, Rovereto, TN, 38068, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gianluca Esposito
bDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Rovereto, TN, 38068, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gianluca Esposito
  • For correspondence: gianluca.esposito{at}unitn.it
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

The unprecedented proliferation of novel psychoactive substances (NPS) in the illicit drug market has been a public health concern since their emergence in the 2000s. Their consumption can pose a severe health risks as their mechanism of action is poorly understood and their level of toxicity is high mainly due to the diffusion of very potent synthetic cannabinoids and synthetic opioids. This study systemically analyses the evolution of the scientific literature on NPS to gain a better understanding of the areas of major research interests and how they interlink. Findings indicate that the published evidence covers clusters focused on classes of NPS that have received widespread media attention, such as mephedrone and fentanyl, and have largely been concerned with the pharmacological and the toxicological profiles of these substances. This scientometric perspective also provides greater insight into the knowledge gaps within this new and rapidly growing field of study and highlights the need for an interdisciplinary approach in tackling the NPS epidemic.

1 Introduction

In recent years, there has been an unprecedented proliferation of novel psychoactive substances (NPS) in the drug market globally with 1124 substances being reported to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime by December 2021 [1]. The term NPS is typically used to refer to substances originally designed as legal alternatives to controlled substances, such as analogues of existing controlled drugs and pharmaceutical products designed to mimic their actions and effects [2, 3]. The emergence of NPS in the illicit drug market poses a serious challenge for drug policy and public health. The ease and speed with which NPS are continuously developed and reintroduced in the market as analogues or derivatives with small chemical changes in order to circumvent drug enforcement and legislation makes these substances difficult to legally regulate and control. In addition, the potency, pharmacological effects and risk profiles of NPS are diverse and generally unknown, where users are often misinformed and lack awareness of the contents of the NPS they are consuming. The properties and long-term effects of NPS are not well understood and few studies examining most of these new substances have been published [4].

Adverse health effects including suicide and fatalities have been documented in association with and attributed to NPS use [5] and the most frequent classes of NPS are associated with medical risks [6]. In an analysis of hospital emergency data by the European Drug Emergencies Network, 9% of all drug-related emergencies involved NPS [7]. Reports have also cited correlations between NPS use and increased spread of diseases such as HIV and hepatitis C [8]. Although case reports and case series form the bulk of research informing our understanding of NPS, it is apparent that there are significant health risks associated with NPS use.

Although the prevalence of NPS in the general population appears to be low, their consumption among younger age groups is higher and warrants concern. A systematic review found that most studies showed 3% or less of adult populations reported recent use of NPS, typically in the past year, compared to an estimated 1 in 10 young people [9]. Similarly, an estimated 1-8% of school students have used NPS at some point [10], indicating a worrying trend of drug use among youth. However, it is important to note that such self-report data on NPS use are most likely not an accurate representation of actual market penetration and user uptake of NPS due to the sheer speed in which NPS are introduced to market as well as unwitting consumers.

The aim of this study is to identify the most relevant publications, the nature of their inquiry and associate literature gaps in the field of NPS. We conducted a document co-citation analysis (DCA) [11, 12] to analyse references and the relevance of these publications in the existing literature on NPS. By clustering publications according to common research domains, articles with significant contributions to the literature can be identified while highlighting the coverage and gaps in existing literature. The scientometric results can illuminate research and identifying publication trends, the links between different works and scientific fields involved in the exploration of issues relating to NPS. The scientometric approach has been employed in neuroscience [13] and digital psychology [14].

2 Material and Methods

Publications were downloaded from Scopus in accordance with the standard and established scientometric procedures [11]. We used the following search string TITLE-ABS-KEY(“novel psychoactive substanc*” OR “new psychoactive substanc*”) AND (LIMIT-TO (LANGUAGE, “English”)) and found a total of 2,365 documents published from 1 January 2010 to 13 June 2022. By limiting the search to publications in English, the analysis will be built on international scientific literature in the field, allowing for a more standardised and rigorous examination of existing work [15].

2.1 Data import on CiteSpace

Scientometric analysis was conducted using CiteSpace software (Version 6.1.R2) and the articles downloaded from Scopus were imported into the software. 106,911 of a total of 111,855 references (95.58%) cited by the 2,365 articles were valid (Figure 1). A “valid” reference is one that contains seven key pieces of information: author, year of publication, title, source, volume, pages and DOI [11]. Due to irregularities in the citation format, a number of references were considered invalid. Negligible losses in references (1-5%) commonly occur during the data import to the CiteSpace software [16]. The CiteSpace function (Remove Alias) was turned ON to eliminate repeated or identical entries.

Figure 1:
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1:

PRISMA flowchart for search criteria and reference eligibility

2.2 Document Co-Citation Analysis (DCA) and Optimisation of Parameters

DCA was conducted to determine the main research domains in NPS literature. DCA is based on the frequency with which two or more papers are cited together in source articles [17]. The assumption is that frequent co-citations among articles reflect common research trends and intellectual domains in the literature [12, 18]. The network resulting from the DCA is composed of documents frequently cited together along with the documents that cite them (i.e. articles downloaded from Scopus).

DCA parameters were optimised in order to obtain a balanced network of documents. Several DCAs were computed and compared, each with a different setting for one of three node selection criteria; g-index, TOP N, TOP N %, as done in [13, 15, 18, 19, 14, 20]. The node selection criteria are a priori settings that define the criterion used for selecting articles to be included in the network, and consequently, determine the final network of articles being generated. The g-index is a measure of the citation scores of an author’s top publications [21, 22]. It represents the largest number that equals the average number of citations of the most highly cited g publications [16]. TOP N and TOP N % are criteria used to select N and N % most cited within a time slice (1 year was used in this study) as network nodes respectively [11].

In order to generate the final optimal network, node selection criteria were varied together with their scale factor values, which refer to the chosen numeric values used as thresholds for the respective node selection criteria [14]. Specifically, DCAs with the following node selection criteria were compared: g-index with scale factor k set at 10, 15, 25, 50, TOP N with scale factor N set at 25, 50 and TOP N % with scale factor N set at 10. To determine the node selection criteria and scale factor to use for the generation of the final network, the overall effects on the structural metrics of the generated network, the number of nodes included and clusters identified were compared. After comparison of these metrics, TOP N with N at 25 was the parameter which was used to generate the final network of articles.

2.3. Metrics

Structural and temporal metrics are used in describing CiteSpace results. Structural metrics consist of (i) modularity-Q, (ii) silhouette scores and (iii) betweenness centrality. Modularity-Q values range from 0 to 1 and indicates the degree to which the network can be decomposed into single groups of nodes, which are referred to as modules or clusters [23]. High modularity-Q values indicate a well-structured network [12]. Silhouette scores are a measure of inner consistency - cohesion and separation - of the modules [24]. Silhouette scores vary from -1 to +1, where higher values represent high separation from other modules and internal consistency [25]. Betweenness centrality represents the degree to which a node connects an arbitrary pair of nodes in the network [11, 26]. Betweenness centrality values range from 0 to 1, where groundbreaking and revolutionary works in the scientific literature typically score higher [27].

Temporal metrics consist of (i) citation burstness and (ii) sigma. The Kleinberg’s algorithm [28] is used to calculate citation burstness, which indicates a sudden increase in the number of citations of an article in a given time frame [29]. Sigma is calculated with the equation (centrality + 1)burstness and indicates the novelty of a document and influence on the overall network [30].

The overall configuration of the generated network and identified clusters of references were examined with modularity-Q and silhouette scores. The attributes of single nodes in the network were examined using betweenness centrality and the temporal metrics.

3 Results

3.1 Structural metrics

The final optimised network obtained from the DCA consisted of 317 nodes and 1,327 links, indicating an average of 4.15 connections with other references for each node (Figure 2). The network had a modularity-Q index of 0.6181 and a mean silhouette score of 0.8445, indicating medium divisibility of the network into clusters that are highly homogenous.

Figure 2:
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2:

Network of publications generated through the document co-citation analysis (DCA). The major clusters are grouped by colour.

3.2. Citation burstness

A total of 64 documents were found to exhibit a citation burstness (Table 1). 20 of these documents belong to cluster #0, 13 to cluster #1, 16 to cluster #2, 4 to cluster #3, 3 to cluster #4, 1 to cluster #5, 4 to cluster #6 and 1 to cluster #9. The article with the highest burst strength was authored by Hondebrink et al. in 2015 [31] with a score of 12.43. The burst began in 2017 and ended in 2019. The article with the longest burst duration was authored by Castaneto et al. in 2014 [32] with a burst duration of 5 years from 2017 to 2022. The article with the highest sigma value was authored by Hermanns-clausen in 2013 [33] with a sigma value of 2.44.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1:

Top 15 publications in terms of burst strength.

3.3. Thematic clusters

Ten major clusters were identified (Figure 2, Table 2). The largest cluster #0 consisted of 59 nodes and had a silhouette score of 0.716, where the constituent references were published in 2019 on average. The cluster was labelled “Mechanisms of NPS action”. Second, cluster #1 consisted of 56 nodes and had a silhouette score of 0.84, where the constituent references were published in 2012 on average. The cluster was labelled “Availability and use of NPS”. Third, cluster #2 consisted of 49 nodes and had a silhouette score of 0.809, where the constituent references were published in 2014 on average. The cluster was labelled “Neuropharmacology of NPS”.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2:

Metrics of the 10 clusters identified with the DCA. Log-likelihood Ratio (LLR) labels are automatically generated by the software.

4 Discussion

In this section, we will discuss each cluster in greater detail in chronological order, by the average year of publication of the cluster. Each cluster will be analysed in terms of both the citing articles and the cited references. The main citing articles for each cluster will be highlighted, together with its coverage and Global Citing Score (GCS). Coverage refers to the number of articles in the cluster that were cited by the citing article and GCS refers to the total number of citations received by a paper as indexed on Scopus.

4.1. Cluster #5: Legal aspects of NPS

The major citing articles in Cluster #5 were authored by Bilinski et al. [46] with a coverage of 14 articles and GCS of 6, and B McNabb et al. [47] with a coverage of 11 articles and GCS of 11. Cluster #5 appears to be one of the earlier groups of work investigating NPS emerging on the drug market, their effects and their legal status, as seen from the mean year of publication (2012) and a significant number of cited references conducted in animal models prior to 2010 [48, 49, 50, 51, 52]. The primary theme of this cluster appears to be legal concerns of NPS use following their entrance into the market, where the citing articles focused on the legality of designer drugs touted as “legal” in the drug market [46, 47]. Accordingly, there were also cited references looking into the legal aspects of NPS use [53, 54].

4.2. Cluster #1: Availability and use of NPS

The major citing articles in Cluster #1 were authored by Smith and Garlich [55] with a coverage of 21 articles and GCS of 14, Wood and Dargan [56] with a coverage of 16 articles and GCS of 7, and Wood and Dargan [57] with a coverage of 14 articles and GCS of 54. Cluster #1 appears to be a body of work that emerged in response to the series of bans on mephedrone as well as other cathinones across multiple countries across the world in 2010, as evidenced by the mean year of publication (2012). The focus of both citing articles and the cited references appeared to be the same, which primarily revolved about the effects, prevalence and use of mephedrone and other cathinones. A significant number of cited references examined their use [38, 58, 59] and continued presence in the composition of existing drug products available in the market [60, 35] despite their legal status, as well as their effects (e.g. [61, 59, 62, 63]). This was also the case for many of the citing articles which also looked at the effects of mephedrone and other cathinones [57, 64, 56, 65].

4.3. Cluster #9: NPS and the Internet

The major citing articles in Cluster #9 were authored by Deluca et al. [66] with a coverage of 3 articles and GCS of 139, Cinosi et al. [67] with a coverage of 2 articles and GCS of 99, and Corazza et al. [68] with a coverage of 2 articles and GCS of 52. The main theme of Cluster #9 is the role of the Internet as a source for information on NPS as well as a virtual marketplace for NPS. It is clear from the cited articles that the availability of NPS through online channels is a key concern, especially since consumer reach and engagement on the Internet is unrivalled in comparison to a brick-and-mortar store, as well as the information on NPS available on the Internet (e.g. [69, 70, 71, 72]). Targeting the Internet through researching and designing web-based interventions such as web monitoring and information dissemination is thus a recommendation and/or central focus of the citing articles in Cluster #9 (e.g. [66, 68]). Research in Cluster #9 highlights the information war on the Internet as a key aspect of the NPS crisis and the importance of developing information and communication technology interventions.

4.4. Cluster #8: Metabolite profiles for drug screening

The two major citing articles in Cluster #8 were authored by Welter et al. [73] with a coverage of 8 articles and GCS of 25 and Welter et al. [74] with a coverage of 72 articles and GCS of 6. Both of these citing articles investigated methods for detecting of designer drugs through screening the metabolic products present in rat urine by applying gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy and/or liquid chromatography methods. This strongly suggests the cluster is geared towards the application of these chemical methods to NPS detection. Majority of the cited articles also report the results of applying these methods to detect drug metabolites in urine (e.g. [75, 76, 77, 78, 79]).

4.5. Cluster #2: Neuropharmacology of NPS

The major citing articles in Cluster #2 were authored by Zawilska and Andrzejczak [80] with a coverage of 10 articles and GCS of 120, Papaseit et al. [81] with a coverage of 10 articles and GCS of 20, and [82] with a coverage of 10 articles and GCS of 88, which were all reviews on the pharmacology of NPS use. The cluster is centred in elucidating the pharmacology of the various classes of NPS, which the citing articles covered from cathinones (e.g. [83, 84]), cannabinoids (e.g. [85]), hallucinogens [86] and stimulants [87]. The same theme is reflected in the cited articles, which were mostly concerned with the toxicological findings from NPS use [33, 88, 43, 89, 90]. Hence, Cluster #2 appears to be a body of work relating pharmacological properties of NPS to their toxicity and risk of fatality.

4.6. Cluster #10: NPS as a New Public Health Problem

The major citing articles in Cluster #10 were authored by Zawilska and Andrzejczak [80] with a coverage of 4 articles and GCS of 36, Karila et al. [91] with a coverage of 3 articles and GCS of 129, and Rickli et al. [36] with a coverage of 3 articles and GCS of 129. The focus of these reviews aims to consolidate information on properties of NPS in relation to their propensity as a public health threat by presenting clinical data. The findings in the cited references also presents clinical data [92], including psychosis [93].

4.7. Cluster #3: Intoxication profile of NPS use

The major citing articles in Cluster #3 were authored by Schifano et al. [94] with a coverage of 7 articles and GCS of 178, Salomone [95] with a coverage of 7 articles and GCS of 85, and Castaneto et al. [96] with a coverage of 7 articles and GCS of 4, which were all reviews on the pharmacology of NPS use. The cluster is composed of a group of work collecting data on the intoxication profiles of NPS users (e.g. [97, 98, 99, 100, 101]). Notably, a significant number of the citing articles analysed data from the STRIDA project in Sweden, which monitored occurrences and health hazards of NPS and includes information from about 2,600 cases of suspected NPS intoxications across the period of 2010-2016 [102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107]. Similarly, the cited references were also research on intoxication profiles and fatality from NPS use (e.g. [108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115]). The size of the cluster alludes to the public health threat that NPS use poses, as well as the importance of the field of emergency medicine in monitoring adverse events relating to drug use which can provide much needed data on the toxicological and risk profile of NPS use.

4.8. Cluster #6: Synthetic cannabinoids

The major citing articles in Cluster #6 were authored by Cannaert et al. [116] with a coverage of 5 articles and GCS of 22, Ametovski et al. [117] with a coverage of 5 articles and GCS of 5, and [118] with a coverage of 4 articles and GCS of 18. Considering that marijuana - which contains cannabis - is one of the most commonly use drugs in the world [119], it is not surprising that synthetic cannabinoids gained popularity as a “legal” alternative in countries - “Spice” being an example of a brand name cannabinoid drug - where cannabis is controlled. Hence, this cluster of work examining the effects of the recreational use of these synthetic cannabinoids appears to be in response to their widespread use and market penetration in the recreational drug market, especially considering its mean year of publication in 2017, which was around the time period when cannabis began to be legalised for recreational use and sale as a consumer product across a number of countries such as Canada and the USA. The citing articles include research into the pharamcology [120, 121, 122, 123], toxicology [124, 125, 126, 127] as well as a number of articles pointing towards the sheer volume and continued emergence of variations of synthetic cannabinoids [118, 128, 129]. Similarly, a bulk of the cited references also focus mainly on synthetic cannabinoids and their fatalities associated with their use [32, 130, 131, 132].

4.9. Cluster #0: Mechanisms of NPS action

The major citing articles in Cluster #0 were authored by Miliano et al. [82] with a coverage of 13 articles and GCS of 88, Rudin et al. [133] with a coverage of 12 articles and GCS of 9, and Ellefsen et al. [83] with a coverage of 11 articles and GCS of 45, which were all reviews on the pharmacological effects of NPS use. Firstly, many of the cited references in the cluster discussed fatalities from NPS use (e.g. [31, 39, 134, 135]), indicating that research on NPS is driven towards characterising the risk profile of NPS use in terms of clinical outcomes and fatalities. Secondly, each of the major citing articles were focused on different classes of NPS; Miliano et al. [82] focused on cannabimimetics and amphetamine stimulants, Rudin et al. [133] on stimulant and psychedelic NPS and Ellefsen et al. [83] on synthetic cathinones. This highlights the diversity of NPS classes available, which poses an immense challenge to the scientific community as evidenced by the constant refrain of a lack of understanding of these mechanisms in many citing articles. A tremendous effort is required in organising and conducting research into understanding the drug action and effects of the different classes of NPS, as seen from the size of this cluster. A defining characteristic of the NPS phenomenon, the rapid development of NPS entering the drug market suggests the continual need for research to update the scientific understanding of the mechanisms of drug action, which is suggested by the relatively recent mean year of publication (2019). Many of the references being cited were also investigating the pharmacological actions and toxicity of NPS (e.g. [36, 41, 136, 137, 138, 139]), further highlighting the need to constantly build onto existing scientific knowledge because of the sheer speed of NPS variations being introduced in the market.

4.10. Cluster #4: New synthetic opioids

The major citing articles in Cluster #4 were authored by Vandeputte et al. [140] with a coverage of 7 articles and GCS of 1, Vandeputte et al. [141] with a coverage of 7 articles and GCS of 3, and [142] with a coverage of 7 articles and GCS of 10. Given its recent mean year of publication (2020), the cluster is very likely to be a group of work in response to rising use of synthetic opioids globally. While the opioid crisis is not a new phenomenon, a spotlight has been thrown onto synthetic opioid use in the wake of the recent surge in opioid overdose deaths in the US - an opioid overdose epidemic driven by synthetic opioids, fentanyl and its derivatives in particular [143, 144, 145]. The cited reference with the highest burst strengths in this cluster focuses on fentanyl and other novel synthetic opioids [34, 146, 147], supporting this notion. Many citing articles were concerned with opioid-related deaths [39, 148, 149, 150] and a significant number of articles pointed towards the rapidly surging numbers globally and its implications on public health [151, 152, 153].

4.11. Limitations

There are a number of limitations of the scientometric approach. The DCA is based on the quantity of citations and co-citation patterns in the retrieved references and does not provide a qualitative perspective for these citation patterns per se. Hence, the rationale for the cited references are not immediately clear from the scientometric analysis.

5 Conclusions

The NPS phenomenon is a major cause for concern in countries across the globe and is a war on drugs fought on many fronts, as evidenced by the diversity of scientific fields represented in the network of articles derived from the DCA. Given the challenges that NPS pose in terms of drug monitoring, surveillance, control and public health responses, understanding the scientific literature and disciplines involved in research on NPS is a valuable contribution to the field which can be harnessed in supporting drug policy and public health response. Such an analysis can highlight the research gaps in NPS to direct attention to and facilitating interdisciplinary research based on the research domains and links identified. In addition, producers of NPS often mine knowledge from scientific journals and an understanding of the information that is available can be useful in targeting and informing drug policy. Thus, drug policy, monitoring and control can benefit from coordinated, interdisciplinary efforts to inform and develop a multi-pronged approach to the NPS crisis in order to safeguard public health.

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. [1].↵
    U. N. O. on Drugs, Crime, Unodc early warning advisory on new psychoactive substances, 2021. URL: https://www.unodc.org/LSS/Page/NPS.
  2. [2].↵
    C. Soussan, A. Kjellgren, The users of novel psychoactive substances: online survey about their characteristics, attitudes and motivations, International Journal of Drug Policy 32 (2016) 77–84.
    OpenUrl
  3. [3].↵
    A. Batisse, C. Eiden, H. Peyriere, S. Djezzar, et al., Use of new psychoactive substances to mimic prescription drugs: The trend in france, Neurotoxicology 79 (2020) 20–24.
    OpenUrl
  4. [4].↵
    C. D. Smith, S. Robert, ‘designer drugs’: update on the management of novel psychoactive substance misuse in the acute care setting, Clinical medicine 14 (2014) 409.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. [5].↵
    C. D. Smith, M. Williams, M. Shaikh, Novel psychoactive substances: a novel clinical challenge, Case Reports 2013 (2013) bcr2013200663.
    OpenUrl
  6. [6].↵
    N. Scherbaum, F. Schifano, U. Bonnet, New psychoactive substances (nps)–a challenge for the addiction treatment services, Pharmacopsy-chiatry 50 (2017) 116–122.
    OpenUrl
  7. [7].↵
    P. O. of the European Union, M. Evans-Brown, A. Gallegos, W. Francis, R. Christie, A. Cunningham, J. Sekula, A. Almeida, R. Sedefov, Publications Office, 2015.
  8. [8].↵
    M. Evans-Brown, R. Sedefov, New psychoactive substances: driving greater complexity into the drug problem, Addiction 112 (2017) 36–38.
    OpenUrl
  9. [9].↵
    A. Peacock, R. Bruno, N. Gisev, L. Degenhardt, W. Hall, R. Sedefov, J. White, K. V. Thomas, M. Farrell, P. Griffiths, New psychoactive substances: challenges for drug surveillance, control, and public health responses, The Lancet 394 (2019) 1668–1684.
    OpenUrl
  10. [10].↵
    L. Kraus, A. Nociar, ESPAD report 2015: results from the European school survey project on alcohol and other drugs, European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, 2016.
  11. [11].↵
    C. Chen, The citespace manual, College of Computing and Informatics 1 (2014) 1–84.
    OpenUrl
  12. [12].↵
    C. Chen, F. Ibekwe-SanJuan, J. Hou, The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple-perspective cocitation analysis, Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology 61 (2010) 1386–1409.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  13. [13].↵
    A. Carollo, J. P. M. Balagtas, M. J.-Y. Neoh, G. Esposito, A scientometric approach to review the role of the medial preoptic area (mpoa) in parental behavior, Brain Sciences 11 (2021) 393.
    OpenUrl
  14. [14].↵
    I. Cataldo, A. A. Lieu, A. Carollo, M. H. Bornstein, G. Gabrieli, A. Lee, G. Esposito, From the cradle to the web: The growth of “sharenting”—a scientometric perspective, Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 2022 (2022).
  15. [15].↵
    A. Carollo, A. Bonassi, M. Lim, G. Gabrieli, P. Setoh, D. Dimitriou, V. Aryadoust, G. Esposito, Developmental disabilities across the world: A scientometric review from 1936 to 2020, Research in Developmental Disabilities 117 (2021) 104031.
    OpenUrl
  16. [16].↵
    C. Chen, CiteSpace: a practical guide for mapping scientific literature, Nova Science Publishers Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2016.
  17. [17].↵
    H. Small, Co-citation context analysis and the structure of paradigms, Journal of documentation (1980).
  18. [18].↵
    A. Carollo, M. Lim, V. Aryadoust, G. Esposito, Interpersonal synchrony in the context of caregiver-child interactions: a document cocitation analysis, Frontiers in Psychology (2021) 2977.
  19. [19].↵
    A. Carollo, S. Fong, G. Gabrieli, C. Mulatti, G. Esposito, To wine or not to wine? a scientometric approach to 65+ years of wine preference and selection studies, British Food Journal (2022).
  20. [20].↵
    M. Lim, A. Carollo, D. Dimitriou, G. Esposito, Recent developments in autism genetic research: A scientometric review from 2018 to 2022, Genes 13 (2022) 1646.
    OpenUrl
  21. [21].↵
    L. Egghe, Theory and practise of the g-index, Scientometrics 69 (2006) 131–152.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  22. [22].↵
    S. Alonso, F. J. Cabrerizo, E. Herrera-Viedma, F. Herrera, h-index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields, Journal of informetrics 3 (2009) 273–289.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  23. [23].↵
    M. E. Newman, Modularity and community structure in networks, Proceedings of the national academy of sciences 103 (2006) 8577–8582.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. [24].↵
    P. J. Rousseeuw, Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis, Journal of computational and applied mathematics 20 (1987) 53–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  25. [25].↵
    V. Aryadoust, B. H. Ang, Exploring the frontiers of eye tracking research in language studies: a novel co-citation scientometric review, Computer Assisted Language Learning 34 (2021) 898–933.
    OpenUrl
  26. [26].↵
    L. C. Freeman, A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness, Sociometry (1977) 35–41.
  27. [27].↵
    V. Aryadoust, H. A. H. Tan, L. Y. Ng, A scientometric review of rasch measurement: The rise and progress of a specialty, Frontiers in psychology (2019) 2197.
  28. [28].↵
    J. Kleinberg, Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams, Data mining and knowledge discovery 7 (2003) 373–397.
    OpenUrl
  29. [29].↵
    C. Chen, Science mapping: a systematic review of the literature, Journal of data and information science 2 (2017) 1–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. [30].↵
    C. Chen, Y. Chen, M. Horowitz, H. Hou, Z. Liu, D. Pellegrino, Towards an explanatory and computational theory of scientific discovery, Journal of Informetrics 3 (2009) 191–209.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  31. [31].↵
    L. Hondebrink, J. J. Nugteren-van Lonkhuyzen, D. Van Der Gouwe, T. M. Brunt, Monitoring new psychoactive substances (nps) in the netherlands: data from the drug market and the poisons information centre, Drug and alcohol dependence 147 (2015) 109–115.
    OpenUrl
  32. [32].↵
    M. S. Castaneto, D. A. Gorelick, N. A. Desrosiers, R. L. Hartman, S. Pirard, M. A. Huestis, Synthetic cannabinoids: epidemiology, phar-macodynamics, and clinical implications, Drug and alcohol dependence 144 (2014) 12–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. [33].↵
    M. Hermanns-Clausen, S. Kneisel, B. Szabo, V. Auwärter, Acute toxicity due to the confirmed consumption of synthetic cannabinoids: clinical and laboratory findings, Addiction 108 (2013) 534–544.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. [34].↵
    P. Armenian, K. T. Vo, J. Barr-Walker, K. L. Lynch, Fentanyl, fentanyl analogs and novel synthetic opioids: a comprehensive review, Neuropharmacology 134 (2018) 121–132.
    OpenUrl
  35. [35].↵
    S. D. Brandt, L. A. King, M. Evans-Brown, The new drug phenomenon, 2014.
  36. [36].↵
    A. Rickli, M. C. Hoener, M. E. Liechti, Monoamine transporter and receptor interaction profiles of novel psychoactive substances: parahalogenated amphetamines and pyrovalerone cathinones, European Neuropsychopharmacology 25 (2015) 365–376.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. [37].
    H. Morris, J. Wallach, From pcp to mxe: a comprehensive review of the non-medical use of dissociative drugs, Drug testing and analysis 6 (2014) 614–632.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  38. [38].↵
    F. Measham, D. M. Wood, P. I. Dargan, K. Moore, The rise in legal highs: prevalence and patterns in the use of illegal drugs and first- and second-generation “legal highs” in south london gay dance clubs, Journal of Substance Use 16 (2011) 263–272.
    OpenUrl
  39. [39].↵
    M. Kraemer, A. Boehmer, B. Madea, A. Maas, Death cases involving certain new psychoactive substances: a review of the literature, Forensic science international 298 (2019) 186–267.
    OpenUrl
  40. [40].
    K. A. Seely, J. Lapoint, J. H. Moran, L. Fattore, Spice drugs are more than harmless herbal blends: a review of the pharmacology and toxicology of synthetic cannabinoids, Progress in Neuro-psychopharmacology and biological psychiatry 39 (2012) 234–243.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. [41].↵
    L. H. Richter, H. H. Maurer, M. R. Meyer, New psychoactive substances: studies on the metabolism of xlr-11, ab-pinaca, fub-pb-22, 4-methoxy-α-pvp, 25-i-nbome, and meclonazepam using human liver preparations in comparison to primary human hepatocytes, and human urine, Toxicology Letters 280 (2017) 142–150.
    OpenUrl
  42. [42].
    M. H. Baumann, M. A. Ayestas, J. S. Partilla, J. R. Sink, A. T. Shulgin, P. F. Daley, S. D. Brandt, R. B. Rothman, A. E. Ruoho, N. V. Cozzi, The designer methcathinone analogs, mephedrone and methylone, are substrates for monoamine transporters in brain tissue, Neuropsychopharmacology 37 (2012) 1192–1203.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. [43].
    J. M. Prosser, L. S. Nelson, The toxicology of bath salts: a review of synthetic cathinones, Journal of Medical Toxicology 8 (2012) 33–42.
    OpenUrl
  44. [44].
    M. Majchrzak, R. Celiński, P. Kuś, T. Kowalska, M. Sajewicz, The newest cathinone derivatives as designer drugs: an analytical and toxicological review, Forensic toxicology 36 (2018) 33–50.
    OpenUrl
  45. [45].
    D. Favretto, J. P. Pascali, F. Tagliaro, New challenges and innovation in forensic toxicology: focus on the “new psychoactive substances”, Journal of chromatography A 1287 (2013) 84–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. [46].↵
    P. Bilinski, P. Holownia, L. Kapka-Skrzypczak, A. Wojtyla, Designer drug (dd) abuse in poland; a review of the psychoactive and toxic properties of substances found from seizures of illegal drug products and the legal consequences thereof. part ii–piperazines/piperidines, phenylethylamines, tryptamines and miscellaneous ‘others’, Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine 19 (2012).
  47. [47].↵
    C. B McNabb, B. R Russell, D. Caprioli, D. J Nutt, S. Gibbons, J. W Dalley, Single chemical entity legal highs: assessing the risk for long term harm, Current Drug Abuse Reviews 5 (2012) 304–319.
    OpenUrl
  48. [48].↵
    R. Nonaka, F. Nagai, A. Ogata, K. Satoh, In vitro screening of psychoactive drugs by [35s] gtpγs binding in rat brain membranes, Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 30 (2007) 2328–2333.
    OpenUrl
  49. [49].↵
    F. Nagai, R. Nonaka, K. S. H. Kamimura, The effects of non-medically used psychoactive drugs on monoamine neurotransmission in rat brain, European journal of pharmacology 559 (2007) 132–137.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. [50].↵
    W. E. Fantegrossi, G. Winger, J. Woods, W. Woolverton, A. Coop, Reinforcing and discriminative stimulus effects of 1-benzylpiperazine and trifluoromethylphenylpiperazine in rhesus monkeys, Drug and alcohol dependence 77 (2005) 161–168.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. [51].↵
    K. M. Wilcox, H. L. Kimmel, K. P. Lindsey, J. R. Votaw, M. M. Goodman, L. L. Howell, In vivo comparison of the reinforcing and dopamine transporter effects of local anesthetics in rhesus monkeys, Synapse 58 (2005) 220–228.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  52. [52].↵
    M. H. Baumann, R. D. Clark, A. G. Budzynski, J. S. Partilla, B. E. Blough, R. B. Rothman, Effects of “legal x” piperazine analogs on dopamine and serotonin release in rat brain, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1025 (2004) 189–197.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. [53].↵
    S. Davies, D. M. Wood, G. Smith, J. Button, J. Ramsey, R. Archer, D. W. Holt, P. I. Dargan, Purchasing ‘legal highs’ on the internet—is there consistency in what you get?, QJM: An International Journal of Medicine 103 (2010) 489–493.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. [54].↵
    L. Kapka-Skrzypczak, P. Kulpa, K. Sawicki, M. Cyranka, A. Wojtyla, M. Kruszewski, Legal highs-legal aspects and legislative solutions, Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine 18 (2011).
  55. [55].↵
    S. W. Smith, F. M. Garlich, Availability and supply of novel psychoactive substances, in: Novel psychoactive substances, Elsevier, 2013, pp. 55–77.
  56. [56].↵
    D. M. Wood, P. I. Dargan, Mephedrone, in: Novel psychoactive substances, Elsevier, 2013, pp. 211–231.
  57. [57].↵
    D. M. Wood, P. I. Dargan, Novel psychoactive substances: how to understand the acute toxicity associated with the use of these substances, Therapeutic drug monitoring 34 (2012) 363–367.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. [58].↵
    D. Wood, L. Hunter, F. Measham, P. Dargan, Limited use of novel psychoactive substances in south london nightclubs, QJM: An international journal of medicine 105 (2012) 959–964.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  59. [59].↵
    P. Dargan, S. Albert, D. Wood, Mephedrone use and associated adverse effects in school and college/university students before the uk legislation change, QJM: An International Journal of Medicine 103 (2010) 875–879.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  60. [60].↵
    J. Ramsey, P. Dargan, M. Smyllie, S. Davies, J. Button, D. Holt, D. Wood, Buying ‘legal’recreational drugs does not mean that you are not breaking the law, QJM: An International Journal of Medicine 103 (2010) 777–783.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  61. [61].↵
    D. M. Wood, S. Davies, M. Puchnarewicz, J. Button, R. Archer, H. Ovaska, J. Ramsey, T. Lee, D. W. Holt, P. I. Dargan, Recreational use of mephedrone (4-methylmethcathinone, 4-mmc) with associated sympathomimetic toxicity, Journal of Medical Toxicology 6 (2010) 327–330.
    OpenUrl
  62. [62].↵
    D. Wood, S. Greene, P. Dargan, Clinical pattern of toxicity associated with the novel synthetic cathinone mephedrone, Emergency medicine journal 28 (2011) 280–282.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. [63].↵
    P. I. Dargan, R. Sedefov, A. Gallegos, D. M. Wood, The pharmacology and toxicology of the synthetic cathinone mephedrone (4-methylmethcathinone), Drug testing and analysis 3 (2011) 454–463.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  64. [64].↵
    D. Wood, P. Dargan, Understanding how data triangulation identifies acute toxicity of novel psychoactive drugs, Journal of Medical Toxicology 8 (2012) 300–303.
    OpenUrl
  65. [65].↵
    B. Loi, J. M. Corkery, H. Claridge, C. Goodair, S. Chiappini, C. Gimeno Clemente, F. Schifano, Deaths of individuals aged 16–24 years in the uk after using mephedrone, Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental 30 (2015) 225–232.
    OpenUrl
  66. [66].↵
    P. Deluca, Z. Davey, O. Corazza, L. Di Furia, M. Farre, L. H. Flesland, M. Mannonen, A. Majava, T. Peltoniemi, M. Pasinetti, et al., Identifying emerging trends in recreational drug use; outcomes from the psychonaut web mapping project, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry 39 (2012) 221–226.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. [67].↵
    E. Cinosi, G. Martinotti, P. Simonato, D. Singh, Z. Demetrovics, A. Roman-Urrestarazu, F. S. Bersani, B. Vicknasingam, G. Piazzon, J.-H. Li, et al., Following “the roots” of kratom (mitragyna speciosa): the evolution of an enhancer from a traditional use to increase work and productivity in southeast asia to a recreational psychoactive drug in western countries, BioMed research international 2015 (2015).
  68. [68].↵
    O. Corazza, G. Valeriani, F. S. Bersani, J. Corkery, G. Martinotti, G. Bersani, F. Schifano, “spice,”“kryptonite,”“black mamba”: an overview of brand names and marketing strategies of novel psychoactive substances on the web, Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 46 (2014) 287–294.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. [69].↵
    O. Corazza, S. Assi, P. Simonato, J. Corkery, F. S. Bersani, Z. Demetrovics, J. Stair, S. Fergus, C. Pezzolesi, M. Pasinetti, et al., Promoting innovation and excellence to face the rapid diffusion of novel psychoactive substances in the eu: the outcomes of the rednet project, Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental 28 (2013) 317–323.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  70. [70].↵
    F. Schifano, O. Corazza, P. Deluca, Z. Davey, L. Di Furia, M. Farre’, L. Flesland, M. Mannonen, S. Pagani, T. Peltoniemi, et al., Psychoactive drug or mystical incense? overview of the online available information on spice products, International Journal of Culture and Mental Health 2 (2009) 137–144.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  71. [71].↵
    O. Corazza, F. Schifano, P. Simonato, S. Fergus, S. Assi, J. Stair, J. Corkery, G. Trincas, P. Deluca, Z. Davey, et al., Phenomenon of new drugs on the internet: the case of ketamine derivative methoxetamine, Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental 27 (2012) 145–149.
    OpenUrl
  72. [72].↵
    F. Schifano, P. Deluca, L. Agosti, G. Martinotti, J. M. Corkery, P.. R. Group, New trends in the cyber and street market of recreational drugs? the case of 2c-t-7 (‘blue mystic’), Journal of Psychopharmacology 19 (2005) 675–679.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. [73].↵
    J. Welter, M. R. Meyer, P. Kavanagh, H. H. Maurer, Studies on the metabolism and the detectability of 4-methyl-amphetamine and its isomers 2-methyl-amphetamine and 3-methyl-amphetamine in rat urine using gc-ms and lc-(high-resolution)-ms n, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry 406 (2014) 1957–1974.
    OpenUrl
  74. [74].↵
    J. Welter, P. Kavanagh, H. H. Maurer, Gc-ms and lc-(high-resolution)-ms n studies on the metabolic fate and detectability of camfetamine in rat urine, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry 406 (2014) 3815–3829.
    OpenUrl
  75. [75].↵
    M. R. Meyer, F. T. Peters, H. H. Maurer, Automated mass spectral deconvolution and identification system for gc-ms screening for drugs, poisons, and metabolites in urine, Clinical chemistry 56 (2010) 575–584.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  76. [76].↵
    A. H. Ewald, D. Ehlers, H. H. Maurer, Metabolism and toxicological detection of the designer drug 4-chloro-2, 5-dimethoxyamphetamine in rat urine using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry 390 (2008) 1837–1842.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. [77].↵
    M. R. Meyer, M. Bach, J. Welter, M. Bovens, A. Turcant, H. H. Maurer, Ketamine-derived designer drug methoxetamine: metabolism including isoenzyme kinetics and toxicological detectability using gc-ms and lc-(hr-) ms n, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry 405 (2013) 6307–6321.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. [78].↵
    D. K. Wissenbach, M. R. Meyer, D. Remane, A. A. Weber, H. H. Maurer, Development of the first metabolite-based lc-ms n urine drug screening procedure-exemplified for antidepressants, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry 400 (2011) 79–88.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  79. [79].↵
    D. K. Wissenbach, M. R. Meyer, D. Remane, A. A. Philipp, A. A. Weber, H. H. Maurer, Drugs of abuse screening in urine as part of a metabolite-based lc-msn screening concept, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 400 (2011) 3481–3489.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. [80].↵
    J. B. Zawilska, D. Andrzejczak, Next generation of novel psychoactive substances on the horizon–a complex problem to face, Drug and Alcohol Dependence 157 (2015) 1–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. [81].↵
    E. Papaseit, J. Moltó, R. Muga, M. Torrens, R. d. l. Torre, M. Farré, Clinical pharmacology of the synthetic cathinone mephedrone, Neuropharmacology of New Psychoactive Substances (NPS) (2016) 313–331.
  82. [82].↵
    C. Miliano, G. Serpelloni, C. Rimondo, M. Mereu, M. Marti, M. A. De Luca, Neuropharmacology of new psychoactive substances (nps): focus on the rewarding and reinforcing properties of cannabimimetics and amphetamine-like stimulants, Frontiers in neuroscience 10 (2016) 153.
    OpenUrl
  83. [83].↵
    K. N. Ellefsen, M. Concheiro, M. A. Huestis, Synthetic cathinone pharmacokinetics, analytical methods, and toxicological findings from human performance and postmortem cases, Drug metabolism reviews 48 (2016) 237–265.
    OpenUrl
  84. [84].↵
    E. Papaseit, C. Pérez-Mañá, J.-A. Mateus, M. Pujadas, F. Fonseca, M. Torrens, E. Olesti, R. De La Torre, M. Farré, Human pharmacology of mephedrone in comparison with mdma, Neuropsychopharmacology 41 (2016) 2704–2713.
    OpenUrl
  85. [85].↵
    C. Lovett, D. Wood, P. Dargan, Pharmacology and toxicology of the synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists, Réanimation 24 (2015) 527–541.
    OpenUrl
  86. [86].↵
    C. Kyriakou, E. Marinelli, P. Frati, A. Santurro, M. Afxentiou, S. Zaami, F. P. Busardo, Nbome: new potent hallucinogens–pharmacology, analytical methods, toxicities, fatalities: a review, Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 19 (2015) 3270–3281.
    OpenUrl
  87. [87].↵
    J. J. Nugteren-van Lonkhuyzen, A. J. van Riel, T. M. Brunt, L. Hondebrink, Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and toxicology of new psychoactive substances (nps): 2c-b, 4-fluoroamphetamine and benzofurans, Drug and alcohol dependence 157 (2015) 18–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  88. [88].
    M. Coppola, R. Mondola, 3, 4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone (mdpv): chemistry, pharmacology and toxicology of a new designer drug of abuse marketed online, Toxicology Letters 208 (2012) 12–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  89. [89].
    S. L. Hill, T. Doris, S. Gurung, S. Katebe, A. Lomas, M. Dunn, P. Blain, S. H. Thomas, Severe clinical toxicity associated with analytically confirmed recreational use of 25i–nbome: case series, Clinical Toxicology 51 (2013) 487–492.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  90. [90].
    D. James, R. D. Adams, R. Spears, G. Cooper, D. Lupton, J. P. Thompson, S. H. Thomas, Clinical characteristics of mephedrone toxicity reported to the uk national poisons information service, Emergency Medicine Journal 28 (2011) 686–689.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  91. [91].↵
    L. Karila, B. Megarbane, O. Cottencin, M. Lejoyeux, Synthetic cathinones: a new public health problem, Current neuropharmacology 13 (2015) 12–20.
    OpenUrl
  92. [92].↵
    H. A. Spiller, M. L. Ryan, R. G. Weston, J. Jansen, Clinical experience with and analytical confirmation of “bath salts” and “legal highs”(synthetic cathinones) in the united states, Clinical toxicology 49 (2011) 499–505.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  93. [93].↵
    D. Papanti, F. Schifano, G. Botteon, F. Bertossi, J. Mannix, D. Vidoni, M. Impagnatiello, E. Pascolo-Fabrici, T. Bonavigo, “spiceophrenia”: a systematic overview of “spice”-related psychopathological issues and a case report, Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental 28 (2013) 379–389.
    OpenUrl
  94. [94].↵
    F. Schifano, L. Orsolini, G. Duccio Papanti, J. M. Corkery, Novel psychoactive substances of interest for psychiatry, World Psychiatry 14 (2015) 15–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  95. [95].↵
    A. Salomone, Detection of new psychoactive substances, n: Hair Analysis in Clinical and Forensic Toxicology, Elsevier, 2015, pp. 301–336.
  96. [96].↵
    M. S. Castaneto, A. Wohlfarth, N. A. Desrosiers, R. L. Hartman, D. A. Gorelick, M. A. Huestis, Synthetic cannabinoids pharmacokinetics and detection methods in biological matrices, Drug metabolism reviews 47 (2015) 124–174.
    OpenUrl
  97. [97].
    R. Kronstrand, D. Guerrieri, S. Vikingsson, A. Wohlfarth, H. Gréen, Fatal poisonings associated with new psychoactive substances, in: New psychoactive substances, Springer, 2018, pp. 495–541.
  98. [98].
    S. L. Hill, P. I. Dargan, Patterns of acute toxicity associated with new psychoactive substances, in: New Psychoactive Substances, Springer, 2018, pp. 475–494.
  99. [99].
    L. Ventura, F. Carvalho, R. J. Dinis-Oliveira, Opioids in the frame of new psychoactive substances network: a complex pharmacological and toxicological issue, Current Molecular Pharmacology 11 (2018) 97–108.
    OpenUrl
  100. [100].
    M. H. Tang, Y. Chong, C. Y. Chan, C. Ching, C. Lai, Y. Li, T. W. Mak, Cluster of acute poisonings associated with an emerging ketamine analogue, 2-oxo-pce, Forensic science international 290 (2018) 238–243.
    OpenUrl
  101. [101].
    C. R. Caffrey, P. M. Lank, When good times go bad: managing ‘legal high’complications in the emergency department, Open access emergency medicine: OAEM 10 (2018) 9.
    OpenUrl
  102. [102].
    M. Bäckberg, O. Beck, A. Helander, Phencyclidine analog use in sweden—intoxication cases involving 3-meo-pcp and 4-meo-pcp from the strida project, Clinical Toxicology 53 (2015) 856–864.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  103. [103].
    M. Bäckberg, O. Beck, K.-H. Jönsson, A. Helander, Opioid intoxications involving butyrfentanyl, 4-fluorobutyrfentanyl, and fentanyl from the swedish strida project, Clinical Toxicology 53 (2015) 609–617.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  104. [104].
    A. Helander, O. Beck, M. Bäckberg, Intoxications by the dissociative new psychoactive substances diphenidine and methoxphenidine, Clinical toxicology 53 (2015) 446–453.
    OpenUrl
  105. [105].
    A. Helander, M. Bäckberg, Epidemiology of nps based confirmed overdose cases: the strida project, in: New Psychoactive Substances, Springer, 2018, pp. 461–473.
  106. [106].
    M. Bäckberg, K.-H. Jönsson, O. Beck, A. Helander, Investigation of drug products received for analysis in the swedish strida project on new psychoactive substances, Drug testing and analysis 10 (2018) 340–349.
    OpenUrl
  107. [107].
    O. Beck, L. Franzen, M. Bäckberg, P. Signell, A. Helander, Intoxications involving mdpv in sweden during 2010–2014: results from the strida project, Clinical toxicology 53 (2015) 865–873.
    OpenUrl
  108. [108].
    K. Miotto, J. Striebel, A. K. Cho, C. Wang, Clinical and pharmacological aspects of bath salt use: a review of the literature and case reports, Drug and alcohol dependence 132 (2013) 1–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  109. [109].
    I. M. McIntyre, R. D. Gary, S. Joseph, R. Stabley, A fatality related to the synthetic opioid u-47700: postmortem concentration distribution, Journal of Analytical Toxicology 41 (2017) 158–160.
    OpenUrl
  110. [110].
    A. Helander, M. Bäckberg, O. Beck, Intoxications involving the fentanyl analogs acetylfentanyl, 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl and furanylfentanyl: results from the swedish strida project, Clinical Toxicology 54 (2016) 324–332.
    OpenUrl
  111. [111].
    M. Bäckberg, L. Tworek, O. Beck, A. Helander, Analytically confirmed intoxications involving mdmb-chmica from the strida project, Journal of medical toxicology 13 (2017) 52–60.
    OpenUrl
  112. [112].
    B. K. Logan, A. L. Mohr, M. Friscia, A. J. Krotulski, D. M. Papsun, S. L. Kacinko, J. D. Ropero-Miller, M. A. Huestis, Reports of adverse events associated with use of novel psychoactive substances, 2013–2016: a review, Journal of Analytical Toxicology 41 (2017) 573–610.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  113. [113].
    P. Adamowicz, D. Zuba, Fatal intoxication with methoxetamine, Journal of Forensic Sciences 60 (2015) S264–S268.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  114. [114].
    M. Bäckberg, O. Beck, P. Hulten, J. Rosengren-Holmberg, A. Helander, Intoxications of the new psychoactive substance 5-(2-aminopropyl) indole (5-it): a case series from the swedish strida project, Clinical toxicology 52 (2014) 618–624.
    OpenUrl
  115. [115].
    R. Kronstrand, G. Thelander, D. Lindstedt, M. Roman, F. Kugelberg, Fatal intoxications associated with the designer opioid ah-7921, Journal of analytical toxicology 38 (2014) 599–604.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  116. [116].↵
    A. Cannaert, E. Sparkes, E. Pike, J. L. Luo, A. Fang, R. C. Kevin, R. Ellison, R. Gerona, S. D. Banister, C. P. Stove, Synthesis and in vitro cannabinoid receptor 1 activity of recently detected synthetic cannabinoids 4f-mdmb-bica, 5f-mpp-pica, mmb-4en-pica, cumylcbmica, adb-binaca, app-binaca, 4f-mdmb-binaca, mdmb-4en-pinaca, a-chminaca, 5f-ab-p7aica, 5f-mdmb-p7aica, and 5f-ap7aica, ACS Chemical Neuroscience 11 (2020) 4434–4446.
    OpenUrl
  117. [117].↵
    A. Ametovski, C. Macdonald, J. J. Manning, S. S. Haneef, M. Santiago, L. Martin, E. Sparkes, A. Reckers, R. R. Gerona, M. Connor, et al., Exploring stereochemical and conformational requirements at cannabinoid receptors for synthetic cannabinoids related to sdb-006, 5f-sdb-006, cumyl-pica, and 5f-cumyl-pica, ACS Chemical Neuroscience 11 (2020) 3672–3682.
    OpenUrl
  118. [118].↵
    V. Shevyrin, V. Melkozerov, G. W. Endres, Y. Shafran, Y. Morzherin, On a new cannabinoid classification system: a sight on the illegal market of novel psychoactive substances, Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research 1 (2016) 186–194.
    OpenUrl
  119. [119].↵
    N. I. o. D. A. N. I. o. H. U. D. o. H., H. Services, Cannabis (marijuana) drugfacts, 2022. URL: https://nida.nih.gov/publications/drugfacts/cannabis-marijuana#ref.
  120. [120].↵
    E. Y. Chung, H. J. Cha, H. K. Min, J. Yun, Pharmacology and adverse effects of new psychoactive substances: synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists, Archives of Pharmacal Research 44 (2021) 402–413.
    OpenUrl
  121. [121].↵
    S. Sachdev, S. D. Banister, M. Santiago, C. Bladen, M. Kassiou, M. Connor, Differential activation of g protein-mediated signaling by synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists, Pharmacology research & per-spectives 8 (2020) e00566.
    OpenUrl
  122. [122].↵
    M. Patel, J. J. Manning, D. B. Finlay, J. A. Javitch, S. D. Banister, N. L. Grimsey, M. Glass, Signalling profiles of a structurally diverse panel of synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists, Biochemical Pharmacology 175 (2020) 113871.
    OpenUrl
  123. [123].↵
    Z. Hassan, O. G. Bosch, D. Singh, S. Narayanan, B. V. Kasinather, E. Seifritz, J. Kornhuber, B. B. Quednow, C. P. Müller, Novel psychoactive substances—recent progress on neuropharmacological mechanisms of action for selected drugs, Frontiers in psychiatry 8 (2017) 152.
    OpenUrl
  124. [124].↵
    H. Chung, J. Lee, E. Kim, Trends of novel psychoactive substances (npss) and their fatal cases, Forensic Toxicology 34 (2016) 1–11.
    OpenUrl
  125. [125].↵
    V. L. Alves, J. L. Gonçalves, J. Aguiar, H. M. Teixeira, J. S. Câmara, The synthetic cannabinoids phenomenon: from structure to toxicological properties. a review, Critical Reviews in Toxicology 50 (2020) 359–382.
    OpenUrl
  126. [126].↵
    A. Giorgetti, F. P. Busardò, R. Tittarelli, V. Auwärter, R. Giorgetti, Post-mortem toxicology: a systematic review of death cases involving synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists, Frontiers in Psychiatry 11 (2020) 464.
    OpenUrl
  127. [127].↵
    T. Coccini, U. De Simone, D. Lonati, G. Scaravaggi, M. Marti, C. Lo-catelli, Mam-2201, one of the most potent—naphthoyl indole derivative—synthetic cannabinoids, exerts toxic effects on human cell-based models of neurons and astrocytes, Neurotoxicity Research 39 (2021) 1251–1273.
    OpenUrl
  128. [128].↵
    M. Valento, J. Lebin, Emerging drugs of abuse: synthetic cannabinoids, phenylethylamines (2c drugs), and synthetic cathinones, Clinical Pediatric Emergency Medicine 18 (2017) 203–211.
    OpenUrl
  129. [129].↵
    R. Kikura-Hanajiri, New designer drugs in japan, in: Neuropathology of drug addictions and substance misuse, Elsevier, 2016, pp. 1055–1065.
  130. [130].↵
    J. Trecki, R. R. Gerona, M. D. Schwartz, et al., Synthetic cannabinoid-related illnesses and deaths, N Engl J Med 373 (2015) 103–107.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  131. [131].↵
    S. D. Banister, M. Longworth, R. Kevin, S. Sachdev, M. Santiago, J. Stuart, J. B. Mack, M. Glass, I. S. McGregor, M. Connor, et al., Pharmacology of valinate and tert-leucinate synthetic cannabinoids 5f-ambica, 5f-amb, 5f-adb, amb-fubinaca, mdmb-fubinaca, mdmb-chmica, and their analogues, ACS Chemical Neuroscience 7 (2016) 1241–1254.
    OpenUrl
  132. [132].↵
    C. Hess, C. T. Schoeder, T. Pillaiyar, B. Madea, C. E. Müller, Pharma-cological evaluation of synthetic cannabinoids identified as constituents of spice, Forensic toxicology 34 (2016) 329–343.
    OpenUrl
  133. [133].↵
    D. Rudin, M. E. Liechti, D. Luethi, Molecular and clinical aspects of potential neurotoxicity induced by new psychoactive stimulants and psychedelics, Experimental neurology 343 (2021) 113778.
    OpenUrl
  134. [134].↵
    S. Elliott, J. Evans, A 3-year review of new psychoactive substances in casework, Forensic science international 243 (2014) 55–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  135. [135].↵
    S. Zaami, R. Giorgetti, S. Pichini, F. Pantano, E. Marinelli, F. Busardò, Synthetic cathinones related fatalities: an update, Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 22 (2018) 268–274.
    OpenUrl
  136. [136].↵
    L. Hondebrink, A. Zwartsen, R. H. Westerink, Effect fingerprinting of new psychoactive substances (nps): What can we learn from in vitro data?, Pharmacology & therapeutics 182 (2018) 193–224.
    OpenUrl
  137. [137].↵
    A. Rickli, D. Luethi, J. Reinisch, D. Buchy, M. C. Hoener, M. E. Liechti, Receptor interaction profiles of novel n-2-methoxybenzyl (nbome) derivatives of 2, 5-dimethoxy-substituted phenethylamines (2c drugs), Neuropharmacology 99 (2015) 546–553.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  138. [138].↵
    A. J. Eshleman, K. M. Wolfrum, J. F. Reed, S. O. Kim, R. A. Johnson, A. Janowsky, Neurochemical pharmacology of psychoactive substituted n-benzylphenethylamines: High potency agonists at 5-ht2a receptors, Biochemical pharmacology 158 (2018) 27–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  139. [139].↵
    L. Simmler, A. Rickli, M. Hoener, M. Liechti, Monoamine transporter and receptor interaction profiles of a new series of designer cathinones, Neuropharmacology 79 (2014) 152–160.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  140. [140].↵
    M. M. Vandeputte, N. Verougstraete, D. Walther, G. C. Glatfelter, J. Malfliet, M. H. Baumann, A. G. Verstraete, C. P. Stove, First identification, chemical analysis and pharmacological characterization of n-piperidinyl etonitazene (etonitazepipne), a recent addition to the 2-benzylbenzimidazole opioid subclass, Archives of Toxicology 96 (2022) 1865–1880.
    OpenUrl
  141. [141].↵
    M. M. Vandeputte, M. Persson, D. Walther, S. Vikingsson, R. Kronstrand, M. H. Baumann, H. Gréen, C. P. Stove, Characterization of recent non-fentanyl synthetic opioids via three different in vitro µ-opioid receptor activation assays, Archives of Toxicology 96 (2022) 877–897.
    OpenUrl
  142. [142].↵
    S. Salle, S. Bodeau, A. Dhersin, M. Ferdonnet, R. Goncalves, M. Lenski, B. Lima, M. Martin, J. Outreville, J. Vaucel, et al., Novel synthetic opioids: A review of the literature, Toxicologie Analytique et Clinique 31 (2019) 298–316.
    OpenUrl
  143. [143].↵
    N. C. f. H. S. CDC, U.s. overdose deaths in 2021 increased half as much as in 2020 - but are still up 15%, 2022. URL: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/nchs_press_releases/2022/202205.htm.
  144. [144].↵
    C. for Disease Control, Prevention, Understanding the epidemic, 2021. URL: https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/epidemic/index.html.
  145. [145].↵
    C. L. Mattson, L. J. Tanz, K. Quinn, M. Kariisa, P. Patel, N. L. Davis, Trends and geographic patterns in drug and synthetic opioid overdose deaths—united states, 2013–2019, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 70 (2021) 202.
    OpenUrl
  146. [146].↵
    M. P. Prekupec, P. A. Mansky, M. H. Baumann, Misuse of novel synthetic opioids: a deadly new trend, Journal of addiction medicine 11 (2017) 256.
    OpenUrl
  147. [147].↵
    M. H. Baumann, S. Majumdar, V. Le Rouzic, A. Hunkele, R. Uprety, X. P. Huang, J. Xu, B. L. Roth, Y.-X. Pan, G. W. Pasternak, Pharma-cological characterization of novel synthetic opioids (nso) found in the recreational drug marketplace, Neuropharmacology 134 (2018) 101–107.
    OpenUrl
  148. [148].↵
    I. Tabarra, S. Soares, T. Rosado, J. Gonçalves, Â. Luís, S. Malaca, M. Barroso, T. Keller, J. Restolho, E. Gallardo, Novel synthetic opioids–toxicological aspects and analysis, Forensic Sciences Research 4 (2019) 111–140.
    OpenUrl
  149. [149].↵
    N. Allibe, F. Billault, C. Moreau, A. Marchard, Y. Gaillard, G. Hoizey, H. Eysseric-Guerin, N. Milan, Ocfentanil in france: seven case reports (2016–2018), Toxicologie Analytique et Clinique 31 (2019) 317–322.
    OpenUrl
  150. [150].↵
    S. Darke, A. Peacock, J. Duflou, M. Farrell, J. Lappin, Characteristics of fatal ‘novel’synthetic opioid toxicity in australia, Drug and alcohol dependence 232 (2022) 109292.
    OpenUrl
  151. [151].↵
    L. Karila, M. Marillier, B. Chaumette, J. Billieux, N. Franchitto, A. Benyamina, New synthetic opioids: Part of a new addiction land-scape, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 106 (2019) 133–140.
    OpenUrl
  152. [152].↵
    B. Lovrecic, M. Lovrecic, B. Gabrovec, M. Carli, M. Pacini, A. G. Maremmani, I. Maremmani, Non-medical use of novel synthetic opioids: a new challenge to public health, International journal of environmental research and public health 16 (2019) 177.
    OpenUrl
  153. [153].↵
    A. Y. Simão, M. Antunes, E. Cabral, P. Oliveira, L. M. Rosendo, A. T. Brinca, E. Alves, H. Marques, T. Rosado, L. A. Passarinha, et al., An update on the implications of new psychoactive substances in public health, International journal of environmental research and public health 19 (2022) 4869.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 17, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Novel Psychoactive Substances Epidemic: a Scientometric Perspective
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The Novel Psychoactive Substances Epidemic: a Scientometric Perspective
Michelle Jin Yee Neoh, Alessandro Carollo, Mengyu Lim, Ornella Corazza, Aurora Coppola, Gianluca Esposito
medRxiv 2022.10.16.22281132; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.16.22281132
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The Novel Psychoactive Substances Epidemic: a Scientometric Perspective
Michelle Jin Yee Neoh, Alessandro Carollo, Mengyu Lim, Ornella Corazza, Aurora Coppola, Gianluca Esposito
medRxiv 2022.10.16.22281132; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.16.22281132

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Addiction Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (431)
  • Allergy and Immunology (757)
  • Anesthesia (221)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3298)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (365)
  • Dermatology (280)
  • Emergency Medicine (479)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1173)
  • Epidemiology (13385)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (899)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5159)
  • Geriatric Medicine (482)
  • Health Economics (783)
  • Health Informatics (3276)
  • Health Policy (1143)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1193)
  • Hematology (432)
  • HIV/AIDS (1019)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14638)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (913)
  • Medical Education (478)
  • Medical Ethics (127)
  • Nephrology (525)
  • Neurology (4931)
  • Nursing (262)
  • Nutrition (730)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (886)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2524)
  • Ophthalmology (728)
  • Orthopedics (282)
  • Otolaryngology (347)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (544)
  • Pediatrics (1302)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (551)
  • Primary Care Research (557)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4218)
  • Public and Global Health (7512)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1708)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1016)
  • Respiratory Medicine (980)
  • Rheumatology (480)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (498)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (549)
  • Toxicology (72)
  • Transplantation (236)
  • Urology (205)